Minelab GPZ 7000 Depth Tests And Charts - Looking Back

[Gold Hound]

This ozzy is hanging for a larger coil and once I get it will probably hardly ever use the 14!

I would swing an anvil if it would find me more GOLD!

The Zed has revolutionized our detecting we have completely changed our modus operandi to best use the strengths of the Zed and regularly clean up in our old area's

I don't think I would bother with a smaller coil as the 14 is already so sensitive and depth on larger gold is of more importance to me than cleaning up tiny Speck's.

[Peteren]

Can agree with Goldhound on this.

I have a patch that produced lumps up to 15gms at 18" with a 24" UFO on a 2200 in its day that have not produced anything with a 5000.

This ground is currently locked up but a large coil on the 7 should see some nice results

[auminesweeper]

The shape size and density of a Target gives the 40% thing applies to all metal detectors Where the 7000 comes in to its own it that it can do it all day every day and not by relying on perfect conditions, I have detected a place one day and found a few bits and then I have gridded the place again a day later and found stuff way beyond the depth normally possible, Where as the 7000 appears to do this most of the time which are the results we all want to have,

The 40% Depth in crease is only a small part of what the ZED can do when you consider the fact it can see many types of Gold including those that were only Visible to VLF machines and when you think about it That is the difference in finding Gold or NO Gold at All as many folks find when using just a PI or using a VLF that is loosing depth due to the mineralization, Any of it's traits are off set by it's productivity.

john