Jump to content
Website Rollback - Latest Updates ×

XP Deus 2 Xtrem Hunter Video From Gary B


Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Kostas 13 said:

 don't forget the gpx is built to work in Australia where it has the toughest terrain in the world.

it depends on what you mean by toughest terrain . In terms of iron trash , Europe has certainly much more iron trash density than in Australia , and is very probably a much more difficult soil in terms of iron separation .

A specialist told me that the 2 boxes dont pickup up small parts of iron , while a Gpx tends to detect a lot of them .

Personnaly I have tried a Gpx4000 a few years ago in one of my favorite fields ( infested by irons ) and it was almost unusable because it was detecting too much iron targets ..

Looking fwd to a side by side comparison test on a big target ( a coin hoard for example ) between the Xtrem and a Gpx ..

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


14 hours ago, palzynski said:

it depends on what you mean by toughest terrain . In terms of iron trash , Europe has certainly much more iron trash density than in Australia , and is very probably a much more difficult soil in terms of iron separation .

A specialist told me that the 2 boxes dont pickup up small parts of iron , while a Gpx tends to detect a lot of them .

Personnaly I have tried a Gpx4000 a few years ago in one of my favorite fields ( infested by irons ) and it was almost unusable because it was detecting too much iron targets ..

Looking fwd to a side by side comparison test on a big target ( a coin hoard for example ) between the Xtrem and a Gpx ..

what you mean by iron trash? old man-made iron items or natural raw iron?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/14/2023 at 12:47 PM, detector said:

what you mean by iron trash? old man-made iron items or natural raw iron?

Old man-made iron items in mild ground as we have plenty of them over here . Mostly nails . They exist since around -600 around here , then a total of around 2600 years of existence , since the celtic ( -600 to 0 ) , the roman ( 0 to +500 ) , merovingians ( 500 to 700 ) , medieval ( 700 to 1500 ), etc   Not even talking about 1st WW trash with its shell fragments etc 

It is impossible to avoid them here and I am wondering how a GPX would react on them , my experience with a GPX4000 was rather negative as I said.. However I have no experience with a 2 boxes system and I am just curious to know what kind of system would be the more performing on a coin hoard search for example ( say 0,5kg or 1kg coins at 60 to 100 cm depth  )

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The XTREM HUNTER treasure hunter from XP is coming to annihilate all the deep metal detectors we know!

with this import the Xtreme Hunter is imported into my country, it's something that always bothers me what most dealers do, I agree they want to sell but I find it unacceptable the way they do it, an experienced operator will definitely not fall into the trap because he has experience learn to evaluate them, but the majority do not have much experience and will make the purchase believing these big words....

If there were no forums, to inform the world, there would be the perception that a pointer reaches two meters deep ?

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

El 3/8/2023 a las 21:41, Kostas 13 dijo:

Por extraño que te parezcan las máquinas de escaneo profundo, se necesita experiencia para saber si tiene capacidades reales para ver objetivos en profundidad en diferentes terrenos. A menudo veo a personas a las que les va bien en las pruebas y creo que harán lo mismo en la investigación real. Los detectores que pueden penetrar profundamente en diferentes condiciones necesitan un excelente equilibrio en el suelo que no reduzca drásticamente la penetración de la señal y actualmente los detectores que hacen esto son Garrett, siempre que se hagan bobinas grandes y Minelab en mi opinión personal.

About your last reflexion over the Garret and Minelap performances specially with the  ground balance procedure...we can add to this ""team"" the Lorenz Z2? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, vicente said:

Σχετικά με τον τελευταίο σας προβληματισμό σχετικά με τις παραστάσεις Garret και Minelap ειδικά με τη διαδικασία ισορροπίας εδάφους...μπορούμε να προσθέσουμε σε αυτή την ""ομάδα" το Lorenz Z2; 

Apart from the Z-1 model which uses only automatic terrain balancing which often does not work smoothly with large frames, the rest of the models which have the ability to manually balance can work in difficult terrains, but unfortunately lose a lot of penetration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...