XP Deus 2 Xtrem Hunter Video From Gary B

[Shelton]

I see only two advantages of this device. It works with D2 and is compact and light and maybe also fast asssembly... so.

[palzynski]

On 7/22/2023 at 10:06 PM, Kostas 13 said:

I have written that under the right conditions both 2 boxes and all pi's can penetrate deep but what they can't do is penetrate when the soil changes composition and needs proper soil balance and that is where these machines fall short.
i can easily locate 85 x 125 sheet metal at 3m depth with the gpx5000-25 NF and i will definitely have the perfect ground balance.

 

I am not a deep hunter specialist but XP states that the Xtrem is more stable than the previous 2 boxes generations with its multifrequency and that it has some iron disc capabilities ( while a GPX has almost no iron disc including on small targets near the surface ) .

Looking fwd for comparative tests ..

[palzynski]

On 7/22/2023 at 11:06 PM, Kostas 13 said:

from what I learned, its value amounts to 1,500 euros.

1600 euros at Lutece detection, Paris  :

https://www.lutece-detection.com/disques-xp/417-xp-xtrem-hunter-plaque-grande-profondeur.html

[Kostas 13]

5 hours ago, palzynski said:

Δεν είμαι ειδικός σε βαθιές κυνηγούς, αλλά το XP δηλώνει ότι το Xtrem είναι πιο σταθερό από τις προηγούμενες 2 γενιές κουτιών με την πολυσυχνότητά του και ότι έχει κάποιες δυνατότητες σιδερένιου δίσκου (ενώ ένα GPX δεν έχει σχεδόν καθόλου σιδερένιο δίσκο, συμπεριλαμβανομένων μικρών στόχων κοντά στην επιφάνεια) .

Ψάχνω fwd για συγκριτικά τεστ..

When we talk about deep scanning, we are not interested in picking out metals, the rule says that it is deep it must come to the surface.

gpx may not have the metal discrimination we all dream of, but it does have conductivity discrimination across the depth range, and that for some experienced operators is enough to get information.

many manufacturers promise great depths and many people who watch videos taken in favorable conditions are convinced by the results, but unfortunately the truth is completely different when you get out there into the unknown.

[palzynski]

3 hours ago, Kostas 13 said:

When we talk about deep scanning, we are not interested in picking out metals, the rule says that it is deep it must come to the surface.

gpx may not have the metal discrimination we all dream of, but it does have conductivity discrimination across the depth range, and that for some experienced operators is enough to get information.

many manufacturers promise great depths and many people who watch videos taken in favorable conditions are convinced by the results, but unfortunately the truth is completely different when you get out there into the unknown.

I just had a long phone discussion about the Xtrem with my MD dealer in Paris ( who is a friend too ) . He has just received an Xtrem and he will test it during the coming weeks , and will compare it with other deep scanning devices ( Garrett GTI2500 2 boxes , Pulse star PI 1mX1m  ) . This guy is very experienced with deep scanning then this will be very interesting ...

He thinks that XP has probably significantly improved the 2 boxes ground stability vs older generation models using multifreqs algorithms . He said that XP has improved the 2 boxes ergonomy , the Xtrem is very light ( only 2,9kg ) vs the others . Also it is very compact when it is taken apart into 2 parts ( around 70cms ) and can be stored in a case.

He told me that it took several years for XP to design and eventually manufacture the Xtrem ..

I will post as soon as I have more infos ...

 

 

[Kostas 13]

4 hours ago, palzynski said:

I just had a long phone discussion about the Xtrem with my MD dealer in Paris ( who is a friend too ) . He has just received an Xtrem and he will test it during the coming weeks , and will compare it with other deep scanning devices ( Garrett GTI2500 2 boxes , Pulse star PI 1mX1m  ) . This guy is very experienced with deep scanning then this will be very interesting ...

He thinks that XP has probably significantly improved the 2 boxes ground stability vs older generation models using multifreqs algorithms . He said that XP has improved the 2 boxes ergonomy , the Xtrem is very light ( only 2,9kg ) vs the others . Also it is very compact when it is taken apart into 2 parts ( around 70cms ) and can be stored in a case.

He told me that it took several years for XP to design and eventually manufacture the Xtrem ..

I will post as soon as I have more infos ...

 

 

xp is a respectable company and I respect them, I have worked with their machines and am happy, I hope they achieve something special with the Xtrem, but time will tell the real value and not the people whose job it is to promote the detector🙂

[palzynski]

5 minutes ago, Kostas 13 said:

xp is a respectable company and I respect them, I have worked with their machines and am happy, I hope they achieve something special with the Xtrem, but time will tell the real value and not the people whose job it is to promote the detector🙂

Same for me I respect XP for their products , it is a very serious company and I am sure they would not have released the Xtrem if it did not add an  ( or several ) improvement(s) to what is currently existing ...

[Kostas 13]

21 minutes ago, palzynski said:

Το ίδιο και για μένα σέβομαι τα XP για τα προϊόντα τους, είναι μια πολύ σοβαρή εταιρεία και είμαι σίγουρος ότι δεν θα είχαν κυκλοφορήσει το Xtrem αν δεν προσέθετε μια (ή πολλές) βελτιώσεις σε αυτό που υπάρχει αυτή τη στιγμή...

As strange as deep scanning machines may seem to you, it takes experience to know if it has real capabilities to see targets at depth in different terrains. I often see people who do well in tests and I believe they will do the same in real research. Detectors that can penetrate deep in different conditions need excellent ground balance that will not dramatically reduce signal penetration and currently the detectors that do this are Garrett provided large coils are made & Minelab in my personal opinion .

[palzynski]

On 8/3/2023 at 9:41 PM, Kostas 13 said:

.. I often see people who do well in tests and I believe they will do the same in real research...

It is the same for classical detectors , bed tests are interesting but field tests are always the most important  . I remember having tested a few years ago a machine with impressive depth results on my bed tests , however it was unusable in the field because too unstable ...

[brys]

This hoard on jersey needed the whites hoard  hunter to find it

they had lose coins to point them in the right place

 

https://archaeology.co.uk/articles/news/excavating-jerseys-record-breaking-celtic-coin-hoard.htm