Jump to content
Website Rollback - Latest Updates ×

Dilek Addressing Iffy Signal’s Legend Vs. Equinox Video


Recommended Posts

With some (people) NM is in a damned if they do, and damned if they don't situation. I've seen a number of people state that they won't buy the Legend because it didn't have an iron bias setting, but now that NM is doing an update that will add that feature.....  

Not one person has stated they've had a change in opinion (and will now buy the Legend) but several can't seem to get over the fact that their demand has been granted.

To me the really odd thing in all of this "uproar" is the fact that every metal detector made has parameters (from the engineers) that are not user adjustable. That includes Minelab's general hobby machines. Those parameters were chosen by design - with the intention of providing the optimum performance for a general use machine. Naturally those parameters (chosen) won't be optimum in all situations, but we don't see a bunch of complaints with regards to the algorithms, frequency bias, etc.. chosen by Minelab's engineers. Presumably most users accept the fact that the engineers know more about the subject than the average user does.

To my knowledge Minelab has offered several updates for the Equinox, with the potential being fairly likely that there will be future updates too. Despite that I have yet to read a comment about having to buy the Equinox and hoping Minelab will someday make it better with an update. The same goes with XP and their flagship machines.

I know of a number of machines that are quite good at separating good targets in a bed of iron trash. To my knowledge the only machines that featured an adjustable iron bias setting are a few Minelab models - and it seems that those who are most adamant about an iron bias setting on the Legend are Minelab users. Maybe that's just a coincidence, or maybe it isn't. I do find it a bit amusing that some of the same people who proclaimed the Legend to be a copy of the Equinox, are now demanding an Equinox feature on the Legend.

It does seem as though some Legend naysayers aren't really interested in the Legend itself, or making the Legend a better machine, as much as they are interested in picking the Legend (and Dilek) apart.

The good news is that NM is once again delivering what the people have asked for. That should be commended, not ridiculed and demeaned via questions designed to imply a belief that Dilek/NM is less than honest.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Andy has written many books on different detectors, not sure why he wold not chime in and sat the iron bias should be user adjustable. Regardless of what detector I'm using I think I should be able to set discrimination, iron bias levels. With my nox I change them as to the site I am on, on many targets, Deus included, if I did not dig the trash, the targets would not have been found, just wish I could reject sprinkler heads

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a little surprised by Andy Sabish's statement ... about the need /not need.... to set the Iron Bias filter ... because it's a very important setting for many detector manufacturers. Whites bottle cap reject,, Minelab- Iron bias, Rutus  -iron masking, XP -silencer-, ... even at Deus -is called silencer ...

We can argue about the advantages or disadvantages of low or high Iron Bias filter settings ...
.- however, there is no doubt that the Iron bias setting has a significant effect on the unmasking of good signals in iron..with low settings ... as well as the elimination of false signals from iron at high iron bias settings ...

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The topic was locked
  • The topic was unlocked

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...