Jump to content

LE.JAG

Member
  • Content Count

    59
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

257 Good

4 Followers

About LE.JAG

  • Rank
    Contributor

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yes ! in other words on perfect sound if you don't see the ring two scoop shot you can hope the jackpot :))
  2. Yes and no a 1 gr gold ring and a 20 gr gold signet ring at the acquisition limit, in identical / compact sand will give exactly the same signal the only difference will be the depth .....
  3. the 5c has long been my favorite machine original it had two faults soil adjustment / even at zero remains operational / you must add an on / off to really cut it at the beach and then add SAT setting with that we gain more than 5 inches on a gold ring but today even with this modifications he is far behind AQ ...
  4. what is your youtube channel ? https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaNciznYBaOjWMZgrFbLu1Q/videos you can hope to multiply the number of gold target by 5 / minimum in all metal mode an example / on the same beach in four days 11 gold rings nothing extraordinary, but it is by passing after at least 10/15 prospectors some were there a week before me !! the spot had digged well all were with minelab / etrac, equinox, GT, exca .... No Pi except my Impulse AQ the first day I had 5 gold rings the two guys I'm chatting with = nothing .. :)) in all metals mode it's deepest on 24k jewelry in reject mode there is a possibility switch to volcanic mode and do some tests with 24k jewelry in rejection mode / the limit will be the weight of the 24k but it's still possible and in some parts of the world especially in Asia, I advise you to do the tests you can pass on spots with iron and find 24k when you are an AQ ...
  5. we should compare in the same sand from one beach to another salt and conditions change.... but in the end AQ will be deeper :))
  6. it all depends if you hunt at low tide or in the water at low tide / like me / a very solid gamatte is preferable most important / for me it's the tilt of the handle in this position / I keep my back straight less fatigue / and I get on the Gamatte my 95 kilos do the rest 😁 3mm stainless steel / and unbreakable fiber handle no holes / too close to the weld lines (less breakage) allows to carry masses of compact sand without fear of breaking and without wasting time the faster the target will be released = the more gold you will find...
  7. on the first image there are two prospectors one at the bottom and another among the posts in normal times the remains of the posts are not visible they are under the sand on this beach / over 5 years ago strangely, all the heads of Teller mine let's not get the swastika, only one of those found, year of production 1938 I also had to dig a very large amount of piece of brass detonator remnant
  8. yes, i stayed 4 days on the spot and after 10/15 prospectors, you have the result big rings went out on the night tides the large signet ring 13.5 gr was especially deep on the video, the square ring and the last (dome with the stones) went out after another target / over / coin and bullet on the 4 days there was a lot of wind the sound / clean / on gold that AQ gives becomes an advantage for me it's the best test reality / and you have it in front of you 11 gold rings walking behind several minelabs of course, experience makes the difference but i'm not superman, lol I just have a good detector..........
  9. currently the gold detector market special nugget represents 80 to over 100 million US dollars (annual) or more depending on the gold price ... most of it is picked up by Minelab if tomorrow a competitor obtains a detector able to take a share of this market he will market it quickly (if he can ...) your theory only works for those who hold the market they have every interest in keeping cookies to face a new competitor then having technology is one thing being able to mass produce it, another ....
  10. the electronic part / the pcb had been frozen the first time in january 2019 but the leap forward, spectacular obtained in May 2019 on rejection mode = closing of all holes on gold detection and possible 24k detection (in rejection mode) led to an upgrade of the PCB (serial version frozen in October 2019) it would have been stupid (for FTP) not to do so... the only problem left and delays launch is purely mechanical for once, FTP is not really at issue it is (it was) a part under contract easy to guess which one (don't ask me ....)
  11. No problem for me anyone can ask questions .. the test in the air of the video is not intended to demonstrate the power just the speed of the pulse I will not talk about Tarscaci / not test for the CTX if you have already tried a TDI pro / 14.4 v you know it's deeper than a CTX for me AQ is much more efficient more sensitive / faster / quieter and therefore deeper = on gold CTX has been out of competition for a long time we can't compare a 12 volt bbs with a high voltage PI / it's another world... about videos I always use a plastic box / port ventral like the beginning / just fix AQ front on the box it's just a practical question AQ as standard is sealed ... I test future programming / upgrade Alexandre does 'perpetual' research with only one goal = to always do even better .. + on videos / I use the settings available as standard the only notable difference is the length of my cable which should make me lose some sensitivity (logically) but as you can see I dig deep enough :))
  12. who can do the most can do the least... the pulse rate very high 4000 PPS (pulse per second) in addition to the high current in the coil can bomb the ground / very quickly (4000PPS) and very deep = strong current once this acquired = just lower the ATS (recovery speed) sweep slowly and you get the targets deeper than any other detector ............... + I tested the prototypes up to 6500/7000 PPS they were even deeper but at this rate there are overconsumption issues and overheating ...
  13. Rick, the 7us should also be very good on meteorites if you have known impact sites in the desert areas of your region will be good spot, test .... you may have websites or books which identifies the known impacts
  14. I guess it's at low tide but i don't see the bikinis :))
  15. personally i am not in favor of wireless digital sound processing to tendency / to crush the subtlety of tonality watch the Deus, one of the best vlf in the world the sound, on a ring or a gold coin is really bad this is largely due to the 100% digital signal processing ... But, I recognize that for hunting nuggets it's different / there is little pollution and you dig all the sounds .. i think there will definitely be sooner or later wireless option
×
×
  • Create New...