Jump to content

AQ Impulse, Depth Testing, Emi Rejection Issue


Recommended Posts


It was interesting that the ANR chip in the bluetooth lapel mic I had tried before this (no posted video) would catch the target response while killing a lot of the threshold tone.  Kind of like the volume low level gain function in the CTX3030.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • The title was changed to AQ Impulse, Depth Testing, Emi Rejection Issue
On 1/12/2023 at 12:18 PM, eclipse said:

Where can I find extra coils for the AQ? Are those even available for sale? I only have  the large stock coil.

I bought mine used and it came with the 2nd coil.  Call Fisher and ask for Art - see if he can help you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, ALEXANDRE TARTAR said:

Hello, a video today fore you, look the speed of swing

Now you can change the headphone if you want 2'' more on the US nickel and obtain a better audio volume response

 

Thank You! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just commenting on the original  topic, all of the air tests I've seen to not do the AQ justice in salt water.  16" is V LF depth and not  the reason  we look to pulse machine for extra performance.  Having gotten a few bugs out of this machine and developed a few precautionary measures (Co-Axe Seal, high quality dielectric grease to keep any corrosion out) this machine is a smooth performer in salt, that has no problem hitting targets at much greater depths than any VLF.   These are not the ultra faint threshold changes I've seen in air tests either.   It's a question of running a balanced signal and using the coil well with smooth, even sweep speed and flat axis.  Having tried to run a TDI in salt many times--the AQ is much more stable and can be run down at prime gold delay ranges.  This machiine continues to amaze me with the many things its capable of.  

cjc

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Clive…..what sort of salt “conditions” are we talking about. You know I like to have 3 foot waves breaking over me and with headphones stripped off my head every minute or two…….and then go looking for my scoop in the whitewater ?

None of this boring millpond conditions for me……..gimme fast water any day .

Maybe I could take my surfboard next time and mix the two hobbies together.

HH

Tony

8B81E7EB-6CDB-41D5-98D7-C4276ED23ADD.jpeg

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Tony said:

Thanks Clive…..what sort of salt “conditions” are we talking about. You know I like to have 3 foot waves breaking over me and with headphones stripped off my head every minute or two…….and then go looking for my scoop in the whitewater ?

None of this boring millpond conditions for me……..gimme fast water any day .

Maybe I could take my surfboard next time and mix the two hobbies together.

HH

Tony

Aaahaaa--I always  say that when people are surfing past you maybe time to quit.  Ya, the AQ does sing a bit when  the surge goes over.  Im guessing that up at 11 / 15 uSc it would smooth out though.  I run at 10.5 pretty good.   Take a big elastic or several tied) and wear it around the phones.  Might save your cable sometime.  

big waves dislodge gold it's the price we pay.

cjc

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t find much in calm water…….pretty sure that the sand has had time to settle and bury the gold. I have one of those neoprene headbands which works well in securing the phones or use the bone-phone (Sea Hunter) if it’s not too windy. 

I like to sit behind the 2-3 foot breakers and then duck in behind the whitewater……..with one eye on what’s coming in next ?

The “impact zone” is where the gold is…..either lost there directly from swimmers or moved/uncovered there by Mother Nature.

Love it……have that area to myself as no one else is crazy as me. The Nox’s get munched up as well and leak from water impact ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My goal was to just verify my AQ was performing as well as it should.  I have a CTX that had issues with both 11” and 17” coils, which ML replaced, because it didn’t have the air test performance that others stated.  I agree depth can be better for in ground targets. It’s obvious with OBN’s videos as in ground was doing better than his air tests. His air tests were better than mine though - he might have had replaced his headphones by then though. The difference though might be only an inch or two. I’ve decided it’s not a big deal to me but I do enjoy testing stuff regardless.

 I don’t recall really noticing a difference in behavior with different delay settings. I guess it’s because I’m not looking for whispers and I’m not taking it past knee depth.  It’s been asked about obtaining the 8” coil. If you have one, when do you use it and why?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...