Jump to content

Rattlehead

Full Member
  • Posts

    198
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Forums

Detector Prospector Home

Detector Database

Downloads

Everything posted by Rattlehead

  1. My bad. I misunderstood the question. In that case, I usually spend at least a couple of hours at a new site even if it’s not producing. Just to make sure I’m not overlooking a property that has a few hot spots that are spread out. On older spots that dried up for the most part, sometimes I’ll still hunt all day just because it’s familiar and I’m too lazy to drive somewhere else.
  2. Too much. I'm somewhat lazy about asking for new permissions so I tend to pound the crap out of older sites until there's literally not even a single repeating signal. Not very productive I know, but it helps me learn my detectors.
  3. In another thread, steveg suggested trying ATLC at sites that have a lot of iron to help cut down on falsing, so I tried it out last week, paired up with the Silver Shooter pattern and it worked great. Very quiet, stable and no falsing issues whatsoever. It also allows running a higher sensitivity. Definitely a big difference compared to ATHC, and seemed even quieter than ATG. If you’re having issues with falsing iron, this is worth trying. It will still tag high conductors very well, though not quite as deep as ATHC. Like I mentioned before, the ID may also be a little more jumpy, but still very usable. The more I use the Manticore, the more I like it. Scored two more silvers with it today. I haven’t been able to get out a lot lately due to all the rain but my Manticore silver count is up to 13 (15 FTY overall).
  4. A few days ago I ran ATLC at one of my sites that has a lot of iron. I set the upper limit at 10, recovery speed at 3, and had the disc set up as a US coin pattern. It ran very quiet, stable and allowed more sensitivity than ATHC. No issues with falsing whatsoever. I agree, it does seem a little quieter than ATG as well. I didn’t dig any super deep targets but at this particular site they tend to only run in the 5-6” range.
  5. Just noticed that. Not sure what shipping costs from there but I imagine it’s not cheap.
  6. I agree, though I have to admit that I do find some of the bickering entertaining. 😆 On one side you have a group of users who constantly hype up a certain brand or model trying to convince everyone else of its sheer perfection, then on the other side you have those who feel like their detector is an extension of themselves and get butthurt over any negative comments about it. Watching the fireworks from the videos calling each other out, and the constant forum battles is more entertaining than most of the TV shows I watch.
  7. Thanks for the info, Steve. I saw similar results with ATG vs ATHC. Sounds like ATLC may be even better. I'll give it a try. It actually sounds very reasonable, since running Fast on the D2 also allows higher sensitivity than Deep HC while remaining stable, and works great for coin shooting. To me, the ID seemed a little less stable when running ATG vs ATHC. Did you notice the same when running ATLC?
  8. You know its going to be a great day when you get a LC 30 seconds into the hunt. Nice Barber too!
  9. An amazing site with some awesome finds. Especially that silver button! Nice ending to the day as well!
  10. Couple of nice finds Jeff! Looks like that Equinox 900 is working well for you.
  11. It’s all in where ya mount it. Mount it close to the T handle and it’ll beat your ankles constantly. Mount it 8” down the shaft, GTG! 🙂
  12. Those are Hip-Clips. It’s a little bolt on clip I came up with for belt carrying long handled shovels.
  13. I tried my hand at a homemade shovel as well (far left). Didn’t have the 4130 so just used 11GA mild steel. It was strong enough but way too heavy.
  14. I like the ones from Predator Tools. I have the Phoenix, Spartan and Barracuda. Most of the places I hunt have thick or rocky soil, so the Spartan is my go-to. I rarely use the Phoenix.
  15. I'm not a fan of the side buttons for the reasons already mentioned. Just makes more sense to have the heavily used buttons within thumbs reach.
  16. Thats the ones I have. I agree, the sound quality isn't great but the fit and feel is better than the OEM WS6 backphones. I can't stand those things.
  17. I'm just putting 2 & 2 together and realizing that some of the channels I watch belong to fellow forum members. Great channel abenson! I've been watching but didn't realize it was yours.
  18. Checked the weather this morning and saw that I had a little over an hour before the rain moved in, so I headed back down to the old ball field for a quick hunt. Didn’t get anything spectacular, but I did score silver #13 FTY, a ‘51 rosie. Anyway, I noticed a couple of things today. Unlike my other detectors, the noise cancel on the Manticore seems to actually work. I started getting some bad EMI on the far end of the field, so I held down the noise cancel soft key until it settled on a number. Released the button and it was dead quiet. Nice. Hope it works that well at other locations. Also, on one of the deeper signals (penny at 9”), I lowered the sensitivity down one digit at a time to see how low I could go and still get a good dig-able signal. Started at 27 and took it all the way down to 19. Surprisingly, it still sounded pretty good even at lower levels. Below 19 it started to fade a bit. That was using the Depth theme, so even the deeper targets tend to sound off pretty well. I need to test it again using one of the more traditional audio themes with some modulation to see how that sounds at lower sensitivity levels.
  19. Here are some Target Trace screenshots, along with a description, taken from my videos: 1) 7" silver Rosie with 3 nails in the hole. 2) 8" Merc with some contamination. 3) 8" wheat, clean signal. 4) 7" Barber quarter with 2 nails and other bits of iron. 5) 10" silver Washington quarter, mostly clean signal. 6) 13" Tax Token, clean signal. 7) 6" Mercury dime, some bits of iron in the hole.
×
×
  • Create New...