jasong Posted July 11, 2015 Author Share Posted July 11, 2015 Man, how did I do it before the advent of GPS/cell phones and google earth Ill take the 7 and historical data over an ace and google any day! I know its tongue in cheek, but in fairness - the days before GIS/cellphones were also times when a guy could still have a 5-10 ounce day in a lot of famous goldfields located literally right next to the highway or interstate. The game is different today, especially for those of us who joined late and are going at it alone. GIS/GPS is a tool that levels the playing field substantially. As more and more leads are found and removed, the need for subsequent generations of new detectorists to use every research tool available to them becomes greater and greater. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norvic Posted July 11, 2015 Share Posted July 11, 2015 Whilst todays GPS and mapping are certainly a great tool. I have found those old historical sketch maps from the late 1800s, have faults marked that are not on new maps.(vice-versa also) So I scan them, import and georeference into mapping software. Why todays geo maps don`t show those obvious faults is beyond me, the old 1800s geos would have walked the country and they are obvious when prospecting now. All modern and old maps are a powerful resource, seems nothing can be discounted in our quest. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nvchris Posted July 11, 2015 Share Posted July 11, 2015 So much of the historical data is lost. It's bluntly obvious when you compare the topo's from the 40's to today. Imho, its critical to start old and finish new when researching. Its these new maps (topo's) that the poi's (points of interest) are gleaned from. Whole mining districts have "vanished". Must be the ink costs..... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasong Posted July 11, 2015 Author Share Posted July 11, 2015 Right, I didn't mean to imply one should ignore historical research and only concentrate on new tech, historic research is always the first and maybe most important step. Gather every single bit of information from old maps to old miners diaries in the local museum, digest it all. Research 102 I guess you could call it is how I view GIS systems. There are some things you can't see on even the best old maps that become quite plain doing aerial reconnaissance. For instance, one of the secrets to my success in Arizona came when I realized I could often determine different ages of gravels within an epoch on the ground and then correlate those observations to aerial photos. In the Mojave desert I can almost instantly pick out the specific ages within the Quaternary gravels that will or will not produce nuggety size gold. Even the best geologic maps might only differentiate between Holocene and Pleistocene, but on the 1 meter/pixel aerials it is often possible to see much more accurate divisions between ages in the epoch. Each field generally has a different associate age which produces nuggety gold and after making enough finds on the ground to correlate the gold to the gravel time period I can eliminate a lot of wasted time wandering around gravels that really have a very slim chance of containing the gold I am after. Later I realized that with the 1 meter/pixel new imagery I could also with a high level accuracy determine average quartz content of different gravelsand areas which I hadn't been able to crack before and that lead to another string of new patches that I found almost exclusively from my laptop in my trailer and only verified in the field. Using the same methodology by correlating known finds to specific gravel deposits by composition instead of age this time. This sort of thing is rarely to never mapped or documented extensively enough to be useful, these observations need to be made by the person. It still requires correlating finds on the ground to digital observations though. Which is why I say those who had the advantage of detecting during the time that those leads were much more common have a leg up on those coming in after them as those leads become fewer and fewer and thus the correlations increasingly more difficult to make. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Herschbach Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Jasong that is one tasty tidbit worth a very long chew. Thanks for posting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
californiagold Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 One technique that I use is patterning vegetation types. In our area certain trees and vegetation can give away fault areas or shallow bedrock areas, and deep mineralized ground. Alot of gold deposits here are made in the same type of geology. Certain trees and vegetation by size can tip off a goldfield. I have found gold far away from known diggings. The finds are fewer and far between, but usually is a nice patch. Sometimes it takes days to find one in unknown gold areas. Not sure if the vegetation trick works at other countries or states. But has been a good tool for me. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norvic Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Same in my part of OZ different vegetation is an indicator, eg. we have a soft coppery coloured low grass(1ft tall), often associated with gold, our native pines grow where mineralisation is fairly shallow. The colour of termite nests(ant hills) can give away a change in country by varying colours, easily viewed from hills because of their size 6-8ft tall or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
californiagold Posted July 12, 2015 Share Posted July 12, 2015 Sorry forgot. Nice piece of gold jasong. It does look very similar to shape of aussie. I find alot of pieces that look like animals. My first piece of gold long long time ago looks like a chicken drumstick. Maybe was why I ate kfc for awhile after that. Hey norvick. Thats good that you have vegetation indicators in aussie. Never heard of the ant indicators. But I have checked out some ground squirrel holes in known gold areas to see what they are digging out from a few feet down. I know of 1 mine that was started after they found gold from the squirrel holes sample. Good luck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sourdough Scott Posted July 13, 2015 Share Posted July 13, 2015 Have to say the nugget I found yesterday is avery similar shaped piece like your Aussie piece. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now