Desert Dawg Posted October 15, 2015 Share Posted October 15, 2015 Something that may be of interest I just ran across on a Aussie nugget forum!! Sounds like Whites may be coming out soon with a new pi of their own that will compete with the rest!! https://www.prospectingaustralia.com.au/forum/viewtopic.php?id=14297 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mn90403 Posted October 15, 2015 Share Posted October 15, 2015 I like the gold in their profile pictures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Herschbach Posted October 15, 2015 Share Posted October 15, 2015 Hmmm..... That is an old lawsuit about wireless data transfer between detectors. White's wanted to do it on V3 but was stopped by Minelab over patent claim. Interesting if White's won but would not cause new detector to appear. White's already has patents on new machine technology so not making sense. Sounds like rumor to me. But I love rumors! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klunker Posted October 15, 2015 Share Posted October 15, 2015 Would still like to see some serious competition for ML. Even up to 38%. Bleevit win icyit. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Watkins Posted October 16, 2015 Share Posted October 16, 2015 Whites needs to catch up for sure. Sorry Klunker didnt catch the 38%? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klunker Posted October 16, 2015 Share Posted October 16, 2015 The 7000 was touted to go "up to 40% deeper". I would alow a 2% handycap to Whites if they would build something to compete with ML. Thus 38%. Sorry- my brain works in funny ways, when it works at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivansgarage Posted October 16, 2015 Share Posted October 16, 2015 The 7000 was touted to go "up to 40% deeper". I would alow a 2% handycap to Whites if they would build something to compete with ML. Thus 38%. Sorry- my brain works in funny ways, when it works at all. Now just wait a gosh darn minute Klunker, you can't compare a Whites to a Minelab, the whites is all ready 40% less than the Minelab so if ya added 38% to the Whites that is only a even-stevens, so your really at the beginning. You would have to be or add at least a "your 38%" plus the 40% the Whites lacks to bring the total to 78% for the Whites to equal a Minelab 40%. I sure hope I cleared this up for you. Ivan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klunker Posted October 16, 2015 Share Posted October 16, 2015 Ah!! But if Whites made a competetive detector 40% less expensive, 40% lighter, 40% more reliable I would then be able to cover 120% more area horizontaly, as 3 X 40= 120% even if it only had 38% of Minelabs claimed "up to 40% increase in depth". of course we must deduct 2% from the 120% which gives us 117.6%. However, If Whites added 38% to the length of their arm strap I wouldn't have to roll up my coat sleeve in cold weather and thus I could detect up to 3% longer which would give the Whites a 1% advantage. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
indianbullet Posted October 16, 2015 Share Posted October 16, 2015 LMAOOOOOOO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now