relicmeister Posted March 16, 2021 Share Posted March 16, 2021 I got me a g2+ a month ago but couldn’t use it due to all the snow. I’ve been out with it 4 times now and find that it’s quite a fun and effective detector to use for my main pursuit of relic hunting, along with the Nox and Orx w/ 9” hf. I think it’s a keeper. I bought a sharpshooter coil used but as I like the stock coil I just sold it for what I paid covering fee and shipping so no loss. I’m thinking of the superfly to use as the machine with the biggest coverage profile and depth possibly, and the lightness for sure is appealing. I didn’t care for the 12”x15” equinox coil. So I’m interested in any comments related to the superfly performance especially if on the g2 but if not on the t2 or f75. Price is fair like an added $110 to the invested $ I had on the sharpshooter. It’s not a must have and I don’t do fields and big open areas very often, so the Nox w/ 11” coil is fine really. Just looking for help deciding merits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. MI Posted March 17, 2021 Share Posted March 17, 2021 It should work very well. It's very light which would be fitting for the G2+. I got one for my Anfibio but waiting for the snow to melt and the ground to thaw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
relicmeister Posted March 17, 2021 Author Share Posted March 17, 2021 For similar weight to the 11”x81/2”stock coil, the 12” x 11” is substantially larger, yet not so large as to Cause problems with pinpointing or multiple targets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kac Posted March 17, 2021 Share Posted March 17, 2021 I like the Superfly on my Multi Kruzer but it was to gain bit more depth in open fields. It is a fantastic coil but would it be redundant for you if you have the Nox with stock 11? Over all comments running it for a while on the Multi Kruzer... Nearly same weight as stock 7x11 Couple inches gain in depth or more depending on soil conditions. Very stable and better TID's at depth. Nearly identical target separation. Slightly less sensitive Not as robust so caution should be used when swinging in rocky or wooded areas. Can false out in the salt water if the water gets behind the coil cover. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GB_Amateur Posted March 17, 2021 Share Posted March 17, 2021 14 hours ago, kac said: Couple inches gain in depth or more depending on soil conditions. ... Slightly less sensitive These two observations seem to contradict each other. Would you explain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick N. MI Posted March 17, 2021 Share Posted March 17, 2021 I think he was referring to tiny objects being less sensitive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kac Posted March 17, 2021 Share Posted March 17, 2021 Slightly less sensitive to small objects such as gold chains when compared to the narrow stock coil. Depth really depends on ground conditions. Mild ground I gain quite a bit of depth over the stock but in areas that have a lot of natural iron the depth is much less. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now