Jump to content

To Me, This Is A Problem...


Jayhop

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, palzynski said:

Dont mix nickels and low conductors , these are 2 different things .. My 1 franc 9g nickel displays a 70 VDI while the smaller coins displays around 50 . Then it is not a matter of conductivity . 

If you look for buttons you should do tests with buttons . Have you done such tests ?

Anyway missing modern nickels coins is not a big deal for me , I prefer older stuff like the coin below ? ? that I just found 2 hours ago with the D2 / SENSITIVE mode ( I will give more details in my "Testing the Deus2 11" thread later  ) .... 

 

A few pics :

A very nice 5 CENTIMES 1862 copper coin found 2 hours ago in a wood :

DSC00007.JPG

DSC00432.JPG

DSC00433.JPG

 

I'm definitely not interested in modern nickels. But modern nickels,older nickels, some gold rings and some buttons all produce the same ID, around 59 to 62.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


5 minutes ago, Jayhop said:

I'm definitely not interested in modern nickels. But modern nickels,older nickels, some gold rings and some buttons all produce the same ID, around 59 to 62.

Maybe the second go-around in some of your sites should be done in Beach Sensitive???? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Jayhop said:

I'm definitely not interested in modern nickels. But modern nickels,older nickels, some gold rings and some buttons all produce the same ID, around 59 to 62.

Gold rings and buttons will produce a good and clean signal I think but you have to test . Copper bronze silver alu etc  produces a good signal at depth from what I have seen during my D2 tests . Nickels seem to be an exception for some reason ...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, midalake said:

Maybe the second go-around in some of your sites should be done in Beach Sensitive???? 

Thanks for the suggestion, I tried it in my test garden and the audio report was a little soft on my coins, even with the audio response turned up.

I tried Deus mono tonight in my garden. It is fairly stable and gave a good response on all my coins in a 5 tone program. Was switching between 17 to 25 khz. The only problem is that it gave a very high ID on the nickel. 

I hate to even post this but it was giving a good audio response 5 to 6 inches above an 11" quarter. 

  • Like 2
  • Oh my! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Jayhop said:

Thanks for the suggestion, I tried it in my test garden and the audio report was a little soft on my coins, even with the audio response turned up.

I tried Deus mono tonight in my garden. It is fairly stable and gave a good response on all my coins in a 5 tone program. Was switching between 17 to 25 khz. The only problem is that it gave a very high ID on the nickel. 

I hate to even post this but it was giving a good audio response 5 to 6 inches above an 11" quarter. 

Why do you not like to post this ? Good response on a 16”quarter is great to hear. was the ID of the quarter accurate as well?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Jayhop said:

I understand what you mean but I relic hunt and yes I would like to find the older nickels and low conductors such as some buttons. 

In my opinion prog 2 is the best on D2 for low conductors. I did an own program based on prog. 2 but with pitch tone because of high mineralization. And ground stabilizer 1 because of better depth. In my opinion prog 2, in 3 tones, is the best on little targets and low conductors. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, relicmeister said:

Why do you not like to post this ? Good response on a 16”quarter is great to hear. was the ID of the quarter accurate as well?

Well to me it's hard to believe. As far as the ID, the best I remember no it wasn't very accurate. While testing in mono sometime there was no ID, this is on deep coins. 

For accurate ID, The Deep HC  program is the best I have ever seen on deeper coins on any detector.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, midalake said:

It has been 20 years since I put a detector on soil. Are nickel's worth the same coming out of the ground 20 years ago as now........nothing. 

Just food for thought. 

 

 

Usually they are toast but the problem is if it's not hitting nickels well then what else is it missing?  lots of good targets in these ranges...it's good to hear that the detector is liked by most of you who are using it and I am happy to hear that it's performing well in iron like the Deus 1 good enough reason to get one...plus it works well at the beach so it seems...good stuff... now if they can fix some of the stuff with the screen I may just squeeze off the shot. 

strick

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strick said:

 

Usually they are toast but the problem is if it's not hitting nickels well then what else is it missing?  lots of good targets in these ranges...it's good to hear that the detector is liked by most of you who are using it and I am happy to hear that it's performing well in iron like the Deus 1 good enough reason to get one...plus it works well at the beach so it seems...good stuff... now if they can fix some of the stuff with the screen I may just squeeze off the shot. 

strick

That is my point. It's not that the machine won't hit nickels, it's just that when using a 3, 4 or 5 tone program the deeper nickels at 11 inches or so sound terrible. Like it's trying to call it iron and a nonferrous low conductor at the same time. 

But the equinox IDs it and sounds good. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...