Bill (S. CA) Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 In the land of YouTube it is difficult to find the discussion of our hobby conducted in a civil tone. You might give this guy a look. He actually hunts, does some tests and applies science and math to detectors. This video is especially interesting in that it points out the different approaches that XP and Minelab take with regard to target ID. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheddar Posted March 14, 2023 Share Posted March 14, 2023 the level of dirt he has on his machines is cringe 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCtoad Posted March 15, 2023 Share Posted March 15, 2023 I’m pretty sure Loren is a member here. His detector videos are very educational as to the physics of how detectors work. To be honest, I trust his videos more than anyone else’s. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rattlehead Posted March 15, 2023 Share Posted March 15, 2023 That was a great video. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff McClendon Posted March 15, 2023 Share Posted March 15, 2023 Loren used to be a member here. Not currently however. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palzynski Posted March 15, 2023 Share Posted March 15, 2023 Yea I remember he has posted during a short time here ... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brad Plohman Posted March 15, 2023 Share Posted March 15, 2023 For me this was a great demonstration of the iron co-mingled target down averaging characteristic of the current D2 version. I haven't done much work in iron yet but hope to this year. I hunt mostly fresh water and pretty much solely by audio. I like using a low notch of 7-28 but was concerned that with an iron, down averaged, good target of 7, or 8 that I'd be blocking the audio on the good target with the notch, but after watching this video it doesn't appear to be the case. The v0.71 software will still report the audio of the good target, and the down averaged TID is just a result of the way the software is trying to provide a stable TID. Thanks Loren Lemcke! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPT_GhostLight Posted March 16, 2023 Share Posted March 16, 2023 I agree, this video also has great information without touting any brand and just points out facts. I'm familiar the down averaging of the VDI on the D2, but this video shows what I am becoming very aware of, and that is while the ID numbers can be affected up or down by mixed targets with different sizes and/or conductivities, the audio is not processed the same way and therefore remains more pure. This video really shows that the audio on the good target stays good, unless the ID is notched higher than the target reads. The audio is key on the D2. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raziel900 Posted March 17, 2023 Share Posted March 17, 2023 yes but xp has to correct this "bug" with an update, a year has passed, they are obviously having difficulty developing it... they must give the possibility to increase or decrease the delay of the visualization of the tid, without affecting stability del tid for deep objects... the fast program needs to decrease the tid delay! I also said it again and again in the comments on youtube by loren and on the xp channel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now