Jump to content

Daniel Tn

Member
  • Content Count

    127
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

296 Good

2 Followers

About Daniel Tn

  • Rank
    Copper Contributor

Recent Profile Visitors

2,037 profile views
  1. I will have it when it comes available for sure. I've just gotten used to swinging larger coils and even though the MDT is 11", it's still an elliptical and seems small to me. I don't run to the concentrations of iron like some do...so bigger coils tend to fit me. Most of the time my Nox is wearing the big coil. I only put the 11 inch on to compare it with the MDT. My finding is they are pretty close to the same depth if the Nox is wearing the big coil...but if a larger MDT coil also ups the ante, then it will be one of the deepest non pulse machines out there. This is in the relic world anyway. The beach may be a different story.
  2. I bought this several months ago. It is a Fisher CZ3D with the coveted 1021 serial number. This one has also been Nasa Tom tuned to 11.9 inches on a US dime. I have the paper work from when it was tuned/calibrated and all that he done to it. It has the validation sticker on the bottom of the control box as well. It comes with the 8 inch coil and this is a CHERRY unit. I am asking $425 shipped in the US for it. These things are listed on eBay for $600+. No trades, PayPal family and friends payment or add 4%. May have an additional detector or two to list as well. 20200229_112146 by Daniel Teague, on Flickr 20200229_112201 by Daniel Teague, on Flickr
  3. I did this video last week at one of my bullet places with some hot dirt. I mainly was just trying some new settings on the machine to see how it would respond. I dug several bullets and towards the end of this one, you'll see a deeper bullet "live" dig between the Equinox 800 and Tarsacci. It wasn't meant to be a comparison video but I had both machines with me and was signal checking as I went along. The Nox is usually pretty good for me but I was kinda surprised that on some of the deeper bullets, I didn't get the best of signal. By mistake, I cut out the settings for the Nox....which was Park 1, sens 20, recovery 4, Fe2 = 2. I like Park 1 for most of my hunting these days and I did cycle through the modes while I was signal checking to see if any others responded better. They did not. The Tarsacci impresses me more and more every time I use it.
  4. It could be possible, as I have a coil for the Tarsacci that was made for testing in the US in the infamous iron dirt of Culpeper, Virginia. I'm not sure what exactly is different about it spec wise, but it is the same size and uses the same mold as the stock Tarsacci coil.
  5. Yep, Bass Pro bought Cabelas out. Now both stores carry the same items. It is kinda odd strolling through one or the other store and seeing Bass Pro/Redhead stuff in Cabelas and Cabelas stuff in the Bass Pro store. At one time they were big competitors. Dicks Sporting Goods can pound sand. I wouldn't take a free bottle of water from them if I was dying of thirst.
  6. The highly mineralized soil part of your equation is going to make this tougher on you VS someone else that is just wanting to eliminate iron. Any detector has trouble dividing the ground minerals from iron and then again to divide the iron from non iron...particularly in ground where the mineralization IS a form of iron ore. What typically happens is that the non iron targets will start to "read" as iron on most machines, or at least the ID is dragged down into the iron range (or up, depending on how you look at the iron scale). Now, for nails and such...that is hard to say too. It depends on what metal the nails are made of to start with, and what degree of decompose they are in. I have been in several sites and encountered nails that MUST have had some kind of copperish metal applied to them or something, because they read well on most any machine. I agree with Steve though...play around with the newer iron bias settings. You can set it aggressive and that will cut out a lot of the iron falses but you will also lose some depth. I tend to go the opposite direction and try to find a good balance of depth but not to the point that I start getting into a lot of iron that fools me. That number will vary so it does take some experimenting while out in the field. I can set my Equinox up in the test garden and especially with the new FE adjustments, can make it sound off perfectly on a 12 inch minie ball. The original iron bias settings couldn't make it do that...it was a mixed signal, mostly iron sounding. The catch to that is, that a lot of the deeper iron will also now start to make a good tone at that setting.
  7. NASA Tom has eluded to this on his forum and I have experienced it myself with the Equinox in particular. That being, just because the detector is quiet...i.e. not erratic or pulsing...does not mean that it is safe guarded from emi. It is called silent EMI, and sometimes it is hard to pick up on it. The Equinox seems to be more prone to it than a lot of other machines and in most of my documented cases, a depth reduction of 2-3 inches seems to be the average (compared to the same settings in a non emi area). Tom says the Fisher CZ series is the least prone to emi of any machine he has used; but the CZs do a terrible job in the soil where I'm at. So even in that regard, an emi hindered Equinox will do better for me than a non hindered CZ.
  8. It is no secret I have a huge dislike for most people in general. The more nosey they are, the bigger my dislike of them. I figure I mind my business, and they should mind theirs. But that is often the opposite of what most do. One day I had a crazy idea and the even crazier part is, that it works, and works extremely well. I have an old park close to my house that I like to detect, but it is popular with snobby people that walk/job the walkways around the park. They will give you the stink eye big time. The crazy idea was...I had noticed the local city workers usually wear a hi vis safety vest when they are working, and nobody even seemed to pay them any mind or attention. So I bought one and gave it a try while detecting. It works so well I will never go hunt a public area without it. I guess people just assume you are doing cleanup work or some kind of maintenance and leave you alone.
  9. If you are a fisherman, you will get this and if not, it will be Greek to you. The setting adjustments on the 600 vs 800 remind me of a 5 speed trolling motor vs a variable speed trolling motor. On a 5 speed, with each "click" movement, it jumps quite a bit over the previous setting. You have 5 of those speeds and the biggest one is top out speed. The variable speed motors have a rolling dial...the max and low end speeds will be the same as what is on the 5 speed. The difference is, you get to control those "in between" speeds instead of just jumping from one to the other. A person can get by with a 5 speed, but once you go to a variable, there is no going back. In trolling, I've seen it to where fish seemed to key in on baits at a certain speed...say 2.5 mph. On a 5 speed trolling motor, one setting may be 2 mph and the next be 3.2 mph. So you'd end up not catching those fish that a variable speed trolling motor would have let you key in on. On the 600, that's what you are getting...the equiv to a 5 speed trolling motor. Whereas the 800 lets you get those inbeween settings for finer tuning. In a lot of places, you may never need it. But there will come a day when that slight difference can make all the difference in the world.
  10. The explanation of the Beach mode stability and performance in mineralized ground was put to me, in this way: is a combination of it using lower transmit power and the frequencies are lower weighted than any of the other modes. Lower frequency machines have traditionally done well in mineralized ground. For results in the air, the other modes do detect coins and jewelry better. But that comes with a cost in being bombarded with false signals and noise in mineralized ground. A good signal can simply get lost in the noise. On most forums, particularly the Nox forum at Findmall, when people ask for setting help for freshwater, 99% of people will say "the beach modes are designed for saltwater beaches. You will get better performance in the Park or Field modes". I guess better is a relative term. If I can use the other modes with stability, I will but it looks like in some freshwater places...probably on land too...where the beach modes seem to do a great job.
  11. Just my opinion but I think a big part of the Equinox mystery is that there is so little hardcore factual info about what makes it tick. I'm always looking for an edge and keep an open mind toward listening to what others say and or their experiences/data. I currently have all the little books/guides on the Equinox and every one of them is filled with hearsay and guesses as to how this or that works. Not at all what I was hoping for. Take the detect modes for example. On most other detectors, those modes are nothing more than saved programs that have different discrimination patterns and tone options. It's no big deal to jump from one to the other and you can know you probably aren't missing anything unless that particular mode has it discriminated out. It's different on the Nox, because each mode acts like a different machine. The only clues to how to utilize the Multi IQ and the modes, are found in a few short words in a chart from Minelab. Everything else at this point...books included...are just guesses/theories. A lot of us have had this machine for over a year now, and speaking for me personally, I still haven't wrapped my head around a full understanding of the machine. Sure, I have found a lot of stuff with it but I'm always doubting myself with it, wondering if I have missed something by not selecting the optimal mode. This almost always leads to me rehunting the same areas with different modes and a lot of mode flipping while I've got a target located. It is nice for a change, to read someone's direct involvement with the product, to begin explaining a little more of what this or that does instead of it all just being mysterious and educated guessing. I find myself in the boat of always wanting to learn. Based on what I've learned, I can take that and apply that knowledge to helping me make a more solid choice in finding optimal performances for me. Maybe even making a light bulb click on, to something I had not given any thought to. In my case for recovery speed, I personally experimented a lot with that, and still do from time to time. Over in my world, in more severe mineralized soil, I found I get better target response by using the faster recovery speeds. However I admit, I have actually never really experimented much in Park 1. Most of my hunting has been done in Park 2 and the Field modes. I have dabbled into the Gold modes some due to some claiming astonishing performance in mineral vs the other modes for relic hunting. I can't say that has been my experience with those particular modes. I seem to have better success in the regular modes and opening the whole disc screen (horseshoe button). Now, a great example of something I would have never thought to try: I discovered this a couple weeks ago at a badly mineralized freshwater beach I hunt. This particular beach, a machine like the CTX 3030 would null continuously due to the ground being so bad. That particular machine wants to run single digit sensitivity there. The Nox is extremely chatty in the Park and Field modes there. In fact, all machines I've had there are that way, some are useless at it. Nothing is deep there, so the way I always hunt it is to just lower the sensitivity down to extremely low levels and scoop the solid hits. This helps but does not eliminate the falsing on the Nox. I read on one of the forums where another person was experiencing this, and had tried the Beach modes and they said their machine was quiet as could be. By my understanding, the Beach modes on the Nox are just for salt beaches and salt water. Everything you read on the forums say to use the other modes for freshwater. Well guess what. I gave the beach modes a try and the Nox is insanely quiet on this beach now. I can run my sensitivity up to 18-20 and not hear a sound until the coil is over something worth scooping. See, I would have never figured to even try that since the books and manual says it's designed for saltwater use, and that there is no way to ground balance in it.
  12. That is awesomeness! I swear though, I know her doppelganger; she is an archery shooting friend of mine. They could pass for sisters for sure.
  13. GB_Amateur -- One site in particular made me take note as to hunting in different modes. I was hunting a Civil War camp and hunted about half of it in one of the modes. I can't remember which but I did do a video of it and the following hunt. Anyway...that first day I recovered several minie balls and larger pieces of camp lead, etc. I came back the next time and finished the camp area...then kinda skimmed through it in a different mode. During that skimming process, I realized I was going to have to rehunt the entire area...cause now I was finding small brass, buttons, etc that I had somehow missed. Sure enough, I think the 2nd hunt produced a half dozen buttons, smaller bullets, etc whereas the first one was mostly .58 cal bullets and 1 button. Oddly, I have NOT hunted all that much in the Field modes. In my particular testing, I have favored the Park modes. Currently, I admittedly have been using/testing the Tarsacci MDT detector more than the Equinox. Except for in the water.
  14. I had the luxury of being able to go back to some of these swim areas when the water level was dropped this past fall/winter, and recovering all/any targets that remained after hunting all summer and early fall. It was clear to see why these had fallen through my scoop. Just a short list....small split shot sinkers, .22 LR bullets, swim trunk drawstring eyelets, etc. These were all mostly single digit hits on the Nox, with some venturing into the 10-11 range. I didn't find any jewelry doing this, althoughI was hoping to. I use a Stealth 920 scoop, so it does have fairly large holes. I bought a scoop with smaller holes but find it more trouble to use because it keeps too much in the basket...rocks, clay, etc. Takes a lot of digging to find what's in the basket. The only effective way of using it was to actually make a floating sifter out of pool noodles and dump all the scoop contents into it. That grew a little annoying to me, so I reverted back to the Stealth scoop. If I realize that what I am scooping is falling thru, I just move on now. Another thing I failed to mention is that the Nox can make it somewhat difficult to decide what to use when it comes to what mode to use. Nobody is absolutely clear as to what the "secret sauce" does between the modes....say Park 1 vs Park 2. When all other settings are changed to make them match...disc, iron bias, tones, etc...there is still a difference in how each mode handles/responds to particular targets. I have all the books written on the Equinox, have read lots of posts over the year too, plus my own trial and error testing. At best, everyone is still guessing as to what is going on, based on Minelab's description of the algorithms and weighting. But here's the thing in a nutshell as it just happened to me a couple weeks ago...just one example. I was hunting a freshwater swim area looking for a ring that a young lady lost over Memorial Day weekend. I had pretty much cleaned this beach out last yr of all trash and such so any signal located meant that it was a recent drop, which is exactly what I was looking for. Well, as far out as I could get while keeping my head above water (not diving). I hit it with Park 1, because to me, it runs quieter and I was looking for a recent drop. I was finding a few recent coins out in the water. But no ring. I hunted for an hour and covered most of the suspected lost zone...the area she said she was in when she noticed it missing. I had actually turned around and was rehunting it from a different pattern direction (thinking maybe I had missed getting the coil over it) when I got a scratchy one way hit. I kept going over it and over it. Down in about thigh deep water I could see a round shiny object on the bottom that looked suspiciously like a ring. Something told me to try Park 2....flipped over to it and that signal was high tone, loud and clear repeating every sweep over it. Park 1...broken up. Hmm. Checked disc...it was the same (everything positive was accepted, 50 tones, iron bias at 1, recovery speed the same) and Scooped it and there was her ring. I decided to just rehunt the whole area in Park 2 just for kicks. Found a lot more small junk but also found 1 more ring and even some more coins that took me a few scoops to get (meaning they were deeper). The catch there is...I was also able to get out deeper than I could last year. Last year it was unseasonably wet...rained pert near all summer. So water levels were higher than normal. This summer has already started out dry and I noticed I was able to get out considerably further than I could last year. What would have been 2 feet over my head in depth last yr, is now just around shoulder deep. Anyways, Park 2 is typically more noisy overall for me but did respond better to this particular ring. Ring had no stamp in it for metal type. The young lady said her father had made it to fit her and that it had a lot of sentimental value to her. Whatever the case...it was just one recent example of many like it that I have personally saw over the past year. I like having the versatility at my disposal but don't like how easy it is to pass right over and dismiss a good target as trash in one mode but then it turn into a no brainer "dig me" in another mode. Especially in an area when something good could turn up all across the metal size and compilation spectrum. It truly is like having multiple detectors in one. When time has allowed, I have often hunted an area in one mode, then rehunt it with a diff mode to see what turns up. I have been surprised by this several times now.
  15. Editor note: split from https://www.detectorprospector.com/forums/topic/9945-my-salt-water-report-card/ I agree with ya on some of your points and grades. After a year of using the Equinox, I can give a fair assessment on where it ranks and how it compares to other detectors for the uses that I do. If I were solely a beach hunter, I would personally feel more confident with a CTX 3030. I personally feel it has more depth to it in that arena. Even in freshwater, I put a good season of water hunting in with the CTX and all last year with the Nox. I found more rings last year with the Nox but I also found triple as much small junk that slowed me down...stuff that fell through the scoop, and or just disappeared. This alone has me wanting to snag a good used CTX. On saltwater beach...this is an even stronger feeling of favoring the CTX to me. I personally didn't mind the weight of the unit. I find the screen is easier to see on the Nox, particularly in direct sun light. I even like the feel of the Nox. I just feel from what I see, that the 3030 has more muscle to it in that area. I can't ever remember having a target that disappeared/vanished on me once I scooped a hole while hunting with the CTX. I had some I almost gave up on cause they were so deep though. The Nox will do the Houdini act in salt sand and in dirt....it doesn't like open holes at all. When it comes to hunting in mineralized soil and coin/relic hunting back home...this changes big time. Even though the CTX is revered as a great coin machine, it is handicapped a lot by red dirt. The Nox runs circles around it there. Like night and day difference. Hunting in iron...same thing. Heavily favored to the Nox. This leaves me in a split mood. Most of my summer hunting IS in the water for jewelry, albeit freshwater. The Nox will find the same rings as the CTX...but it also wants to lock onto those small pieces of crap that fall through the scoop. I need to figure out a way to have both and hope the wife doesn't find out ?
×
×
  • Create New...