Steve Herschbach Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 With Rick reporting that FT CEO Tom Walsh took the Impulse on a recent vacation and came back with things he wanted improved, I see only more delays on the horizon. My weather has warmed up and I could use this detector now, but I am instead crossing my fingers I can get one before the end of summer. This is definitely not a machine to wait around for. I honestly would not be shocked if it ended up rolling into next year. 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackpine Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 On 1/23/2020 at 3:20 PM, fredmason said: AMEN.... my best friend of 51 years up and died last week.... I expected he would outlive me by 20 years...it was not to be fred Fred I'm sorry for the loss of your friend. Coincidentally I also lost a lifelong friend just over a week ago. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UtahRich Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 How long are we suppose to wait? If it's a long enough wait, I can not wait, but still be waiting. Know what I mean? Rich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chase Goldman Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 On 1/31/2020 at 1:14 PM, Steve Herschbach said: With Rick reporting that FT CEO Tom Walsh took the Impulse on a recent vacation and came back with things he wanted improved, I see only more delays on the horizon. My weather has warmed up and I could use this detector now, but I am instead crossing my fingers I can get one before the end of summer. This is definitely not a machine to wait around for. I honestly would not be shocked if it ended up rolling into next year. I can see the need to meet regulatory requirements which was mentioned as the reason Rick had to return his machine to FT. That and the need to work out legitimate bugs/flaws nothing can be done to short circuit those legit requirements. But this statement regarding more "improvements" and another one by one of the design/test team implying the lead designer is always trying make the design better makes me wonder at what point does design optimization effectively become polishing the cannonball as better or perfection is the enemy of good enough. Not sure it is clear if the finish line has been defined for this project so, yeah, the wait contnues with no end in site. Sorry, UtahRich... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post LE.JAG Posted February 3, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 3, 2020 the electronic part / the pcbhad been frozen the first timein january 2019but the leap forward,spectacular obtained in May 2019on rejection mode = closing of all holes on gold detectionand possible 24k detection (in rejection mode)led to an upgrade of the PCB (serial version frozen in October 2019)it would have been stupid (for FTP) not to do so...the only problem leftand delays launch is purely mechanicalfor once, FTP is not really at issueit is (it was) a part under contracteasy to guess which one (don't ask me ....) 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EL NINO77 Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 Thank you ... for explaining LE.JAG .... I think ... when the manufacturer devotes a little more time to fine-tune the Top pulse detector, or its final production it's just a good thing ..., Finally, everyone wants to buy for their money ... the better tuned Detector ... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
okara gold Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 I guess that for anyone wanting this new machine... there's nothing we can do but wait. What helps me is knowing that every day that goes by, does get me 1 day closer to an announcement from Fisher... Hopefully Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chase Goldman Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 2 hours ago, EL NINO77 said: Thank you ... for explaining LE.JAG .... Ditto. Provides some clarity. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick K - First Member Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 Just in case LE.JAG’s “Franglais” wasn’t crystal clear, when he wrote... ”for once, FTP is not really at issueit is (it was) a part under contract” He is referring to a purchased-in component of the mechanical package (not the electronics) which failed to meet expectations. This is separate from the certification issue. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now