Jump to content

Chasing Stupidly Small Gold Continued And A Dramatic Rescue


Recommended Posts


Great post, flakmagnet; thanks for sharing.  All of us who inhabit this planet need to respect it but particularly those of us who use more of it -- filling our holes (and those holes left by the idiots), carrying out our trash and that of others, and especially protecting the wildlife.  It's their home, we are merely visitors.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

kiwijw re ( Keeping the coil virtually scrubbing the ground, as you can't get any closer to gold than that),

I understood when I purchased the 7k that the coil should approx 2inches off the ground when detecting, unlike  my years of close to the ground detecting with the 4500. Only last year have I moved to a close to the ground approach recommended by a friend as keeping the weight of the coil off the ground was killing my back.

I wonder did I get the wrong info back when I purchased the 7K years ago, or when did the detecting method change. I have found very small gold in WA with the off the ground approach and not so much in the Vic Golden Triangle mainly because I have not spent the time there with the 7k.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would rather defer to more experienced people than me as to what is best. For myself I vary what I do. Sometimes I basically scrub the coil and sometimes I keep it 1/2 of an inch or so off the ground. I don't know which is better, I find gold using both methods.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PeterInSa said:

I wonder did I get the wrong info back when I purchased the 7K years ago, or when did the detecting method change.

When I had the Z I most gently rolled across the surface. It helped with weight support and also finding the tiddlers.  Where I detect I was able to do this.  

But, and I am sure JP will confirm or deny this, I am sure I read a thing from JP where he suggested running the Z coil 1-2 inches off the ground particularly in saturable ground.  I think the reasoning was that if the detector was simply unusable at ground level then being 2 inches closer to the gold was no advantage.  However, if by running 2 inches off the ground you could still detect then at least you were still in the game.  As always JP, feel free to correct me  ?

Edit - actually it was Steve H - half way down the first post.   https://www.detectorprospector.com/forums/topic/970-minelab-gpz-7000-a-super-vlf-saturable-soil-tips/

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my memory of detector manuals, most wanted you to keep the coil off the ground and there are different heights per model of detector, but 2" was mentioned many times.  Now I know for a fact when my staff and I train customers, we want them to keep it as close to the ground as possible.  The reality of it is, the ground type/structure I am sweeping over.  If really rough ground with many rocks and cobbles, I'll keep the coil just above.  If it is smoother ground, I like to let the coil slide across the ground.  Now on occasion extremely hot ground is encountered and when GB'ing, I notice detector won't keep up, then I adjust the coil height to stay in the "happy medium".

Another issue I run into with the 7000 and others.  If it is really hot temperature outside and I don't want to wear headphones, then I'll lift the coil and set my bungee just above ground level, so I am not hearing the coil skid across the ground as the noise it makes does not allow me to hear the faintest of potential signals.  Most folks who know me, will tell you, I prefer to wear headphones when using a GPZ, as the coil is usually making noise as it scuffs the ground quite regularly.  

Now when using other machines or chasing bigger gold or new ground, my mind is more in a cruise mode trying to find the indicator nugget.  Then my coil is usually a little higher (1/2 to 1") off the ground.

Like others have said and I feel the same way.  In most ground I hunt with a 7, the 2" off is a loss of 2" in depth.  But in reality, just like settings and threshold level, there is no right and wrong, just more of a what do you feel comfortable with. If you are happy with your results, then I'm happy for you.

As for different coils and some other detector models?  I have had units, that could not even be used scuffing the ground because the detector and coil would make to much noise.  I myself attribute that to a bad coil.  The Fisher GB-2, small 6" ellip coil had had a change when they moved from Los Banos, CA to Texas and for about a year, the coils being made, had a high % bad coils.  I think I was on their shit list for a while, as I would send them back multiple coils telling them they were bad.  They would argue with me saying the tested just fine.  Now the coil has changed design, so that goes to show there was some issues, plus a few other things inside, but they have a handle on it now and those small gold grabber 6" ellip coils can be used on the ground.

Bottom line:  If you're not wearing out your coil cover, you are missing gold.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Gerry in Idaho said:

Bottom line:  If you're not wearing out your coil cover, you are missing gold.

I am on my second coil cover if that says anything (I am not out all that often until lately). I also remember JP recommending having the coil off the ground i.e. not scrubbing and there was a reason for it but I can't remember if it was to keep the detector from being oversaturated. JP?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...