spencer@wy Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Been thinking of different ways to detect gold and thought of a theory i would like feed bback on. everything has a resonant frequency, right? Why not bombard ground at golds nuclear magnetic resonace frequency and use ssiesmic sensors to find the target area? Hhhmmm..... what do you smart people out there think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lunk Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Dammit Jim, I'm a prospector, not a nuclear physicist! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klunker Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Some time ago there were ads in mining J for such a thing. I saved them (in my wood stove) along with the ads for long distance locators made from transistor radio antennas and pocket calculators. A gismo that could read the speed of an electron around a nucleus would probably weigh more than a GPZ 7000 and cost nearly as much. PLEASE DISREGARD THE ABOVE as I am not a smart people. . 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spencer@wy Posted December 16, 2015 Author Share Posted December 16, 2015 Klunker, do you remember which issue? I am sceptical as well about rods and antennas, however a fella i know did find significant deposit of black sands 16' down with his rods. that fellas been at it long time and just bought a new plant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sourdough Scott Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 For every reaction, there is a opposite reaction. Everything that has a atom, gives off a smell and resonance. So of you could harness that somehow. You might be on to something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spencer@wy Posted December 16, 2015 Author Share Posted December 16, 2015 Also, i dont think i would attempt to read the speed of the electron, merely exite it and locate the corresponding siesmic activity. granted hf freq. generators could be expesive and dangerous-im just sharing my brain-farts with others in search of new angles at which to look from. thanks for posting up guys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klunker Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Probably 10 years ago + -. Called "Molecular Frequency Detectors". I have seen some convincing demonstrations with rods, and some spectacular failures, so i don't discount their use by some people. A long time ago, my father used a system were you put steel stakes in the ground, connected these stakes to a frequency generator and was able to locate high grade chrome pockets. C. Ralph could probably explain how this worked. I've often thought this could be adapted to nugget hunting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spencer@wy Posted December 16, 2015 Author Share Posted December 16, 2015 Thanks Klunker, that info may prove very helpful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Herschbach Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 Self Potential Method HANDBOOK OF GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING METHODS FOR THE ALASKAN PROSPECTOR http://pubs.dggsalaskagov.us/webpubs/mirl/report_no/text/mirl_n19.pdf Page 22 Review of Compass Depth Doubler by Gordon Zahara http://compass-metal-detector-forum.548136.n2.nabble.com/Compass-Depth-Multiplier-Field-Test-td4407130.html 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klunker Posted December 16, 2015 Share Posted December 16, 2015 There ya go Spncer. one of the smart people. THNKs Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now