Steve Herschbach Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 9 minutes ago, Geotech said: This was a good differentiator until the GPZ came along. In traditional PI the TX current is turned completely off during the RX sampling. In the GPZ it is not, but it is also not changing (the TX current is a bipolar square wave) so the result is exactly the same: there is no changing TX field during RX sampling. So now my definition of PI is a system that receives during a TX dead time, whether current is zero or a DC value. Put another way, during sampling there is no reactive signal. *Inside the Metal Detector, 3rd ed, Ch 2; pub. 2023 (I hope) OK, so with appropriate footnote of GPZ being different (but kind of the same), I still think for your average Joe, continuous versus intermittent is easiest to digest. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vive equinox Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 mandible gives me the impression of not being super fast in reactivity in view of this and its high price I doubt that it is a best seller on European lands except among beach hunters 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Herschbach Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 Pretty much everything about this detector screams to me the focus is on deep silver, the one area where it was generally said that CTX has an edge on the Nox. I do think this is intended to fill the empty slot left by the departure of the E-TRAC, but it may also very well replace the CTX for a lot of people. If it hits silver as well, and has better waterproof integrity, in a lighter, less expensive package, why not? Kind of begs the question then of what would be good enough to replace the CTX at $2500? Maybe the direction of the market no longer supports such high priced coin detectors, and Minelab has seen that writing on the wall. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
la torche Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 On 04/09/2022 at 13:45, Dan(NM) said: Voici une autre vidéo mettant en vedette Mark Lawrie... Un peu de questions-réponses. ..... I notice one thing on the Manticore at 23.33mn it takes a target ''just under a gram'' and mounts it about 20cm above the disc. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palzynski Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 1 hour ago, la torche said: I notice one thing on the Manticore at 23.33mn it takes a target ''just under a gram'' and mounts it about 20cm above the disc. It is a ring then a quite conductive target due to its circular shape , then it is normal to get 20cm in the air for such a target with a VLF in the air I think ... But it is difficult to assess exact distances from a video ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
palzynski Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 12 hours ago, vive equinox said: mandible gives me the impression of not being super fast in reactivity in view of this and its high price I doubt that it is a best seller on European lands except among beach hunters I have the same feeling concerning the reactivity too .. Future will tell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GB_Amateur Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 1 hour ago, vive equinox said: mandible gives me the impression of not being super fast in reactivity Depending upon what someone means by "super fast", this might be 100% true or 100% false for every detector ever made. Please elaborate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GB_Amateur Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 1 hour ago, Steve Herschbach said: I do think this is intended to fill the empty slot left by the departure of the E-TRAC, but it may also very well replace the CTX for a lot of people. If it hits silver as well, and has better waterproof integrity, in a lighter, less expensive package, why not? Kind of begs the question then of what would be good enough to replace the CTX at $2500? As you note, the CTX3030 misses today's coin detector market in two ways: weight (5.2 lb) and price ($2500 in the USA). That's 2 lb heavier than the Nokta/Makro Legend (and even more vs. other modern multifrequency choices) and $900 (in the USA) more than its most expensive competitor -- XP Deus 2. You've pointed out multiple times that Minelab seems to cycle new product development+delivery among dedicated gold detectors and coin/relic/jewelry detectors. Among its bread winning space, gold detectors, it has three different types to fit into the cycle. From your database, here are some relative release dates: CTX3030 (high priced coin/relic/jewelry IB): 10 years ago. GPZ7000 (top end gold ZVT): 7 years ago. Gold Monster 1000 (gold IB): 5 years ago. Equinox 800,600 (intermediate priced coin/relic/jewelry + gold IB): 4 years ago. Vanquish 540,440,340 (low cost coin/relic/jewelry IB): 2 years ago. GPX 6000 (gold PI): 1 year ago. Manticore: (intermediate coin/relic/jewelry + gold IB): late this year? A couple things seem to jump out (and again I'm not the first or second or... to point this out): A) the GPZ7000 appears to be due for an upgrade, after 7 years. The fact that it doesn't seem to have competition may explain that long time period. B) the CTX3030 is the oldest detector on this list, and furthermore, the Equinox has not only been introduced in the meantime , but so has its successor, the Manticore. Like the White's Vision (V3i, etc.), it seems that the detector world has spoken: KISS. And Minelab apparently has reacted accordingly. 3 hours ago, Steve Herschbach said: Maybe the direction of the market no longer supports such high priced coin detectors, and Minelab has seen that writing on the wall. That is my conclusion, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phrunt Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 Yet they price the CTX and Mandible almost the same price in NZ and Australia so they're not concerned about high priced coin detectors in our markets. The CTX has no competition being the only detector using FBS2, nor does the GPZ being the only ZVT so they're pretty safe and they don't seem to be in a rush to replace them, deep silver hunters tend to prefer the CTX over anything else from what I've seen and that holds true for me and deep gold is still the GPZ for sure. The Mandible may eat into the CTX market even further after the Equinox chewed into it pretty severely but really, it's Minelab vs Minelab so they don't overly need to care about that. They may as well hold back releases until the competition starts to catch up. It seems that's what happened with the Muncheros, once Nokta and XP started to stir up the market a bit doing an Equinox competitor they release a detector to take them on, they'd been working on it for 3 years so I guess they wanted to make sure it was finely polished and not release it too early when XP and Nokta first did their releases, Nokta released the Legend too early in my opinion probably to try beat XP with the Legend having to do a bunch of firmware updates fixing up many problems. I haven't followed the XP much as I didn't like it from the start with it's wireless coils but it also appeared to need many updates to fix problems. Garrett now has the Axiom so how Minelab responds to that will be interesting especially in markets where its priced significantly cheaper than the 6000, will they update the GPX 5000 to a new form factor and at an appealing price to combat the Axiom? Maybe, it's still a current model and excels where the 6000 and 7000 don't so it's not ready to be discontinued but it is very dated and could use a refresh. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now