Steve Herschbach Posted March 22, 2019 Share Posted March 22, 2019 Demonstration of the high speed responses for various objects waved under the coil of the new Fisher Impulse AQ metal detector. HRS® "Highly Reactive System" Official Fisher video. Fisher Impulse AQ Detector Data & User Reviews Fisher Impulse AQ HRS® "Highly Reactive System" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Gillespie Posted April 9, 2019 Share Posted April 9, 2019 Nothing new that I can see. My White's SL can perform the same audio responses. Like I said, nothing new that I can see. I can detect a gold ring and ignore nails too. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Herschbach Posted January 9, 2020 Author Share Posted January 9, 2020 Time to bump to the top. I’ve replaced the old videos in the original posts with the latest versions supplied by Alexandre. ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carolina Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 I would be more interested in a slow speed response I believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LE.JAG Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 2 hours ago, Carolina said: I would be more interested in a slow speed response I believe. who can do the mostcan do the least... the pulse rate very high 4000 PPS (pulse per second)in addition to the high current in the coilcan bomb the ground / very quickly (4000PPS)and very deep = strong currentonce this acquired =just lower the ATS (recovery speed)sweep slowlyand you get the targets deeperthan any other detector ............... + I tested the prototypesup to 6500/7000 PPSthey were even deeperbut at this ratethere are overconsumption issuesand overheating ... 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Beechnut OBN Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 Of all the video's this one has to be my favorite. The lack of any other noise, other then the target.....Then..... in Almetal...you can shape, size, and hear depth on the targets............................. AT 30 seconds one can hear the nail at a distance, but faint...this is telling me there is so much beyond that......Not a "here I am dig signal" but one that will need help to be heard. After the two year warranty is up, it's going to be hard not to make changes to the "AQ"...other then the head phones. Come on "AQ".. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carolina Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 My point is my CTX and my Tarsacci can duplicate that test and at even greater distance. I realize this is a air test but there is little distance from coil to target before fading out. I would guess the sensitivity is dialed back hence the quite background. Even there nail bed test demo with the gold ring. After 10” max the ring signal fades out. I did however see LE JAG dig some deep targets but it was strange as I swear I saw a shaft with a handle and no housing. Like it was belt mounted. Never saw the control box. I’m not trying to cause trouble, just lots of strange things with this roll out and videos etc. I’m just one man so don’t anybody get mad and leave the forum on my account. My comments have little worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Herschbach Posted January 31, 2020 Author Share Posted January 31, 2020 It seems to me that if there is any hesitation at all regarding the detector or suspicion regarding the sources of the information then simply waiting for as many months as a person wants after the machine is released for third party reports would be the reasonable solution. The general idea is that the forum exists for people who are hoping to get information, and not shut down contributors of information as has been the norm on other forums. If people don't like the information that anyone is presenting, the forum offers a feature for blocking other users. How To Ignore Users On The Forum 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carolina Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 20 hours ago, Steve Herschbach said: It seems to me that if there is any hesitation at all regarding the detector or suspicion regarding the sources of the information then simply waiting for as many months as a person wants after the machine is released for third party reports would be the reasonable solution. The general idea is that the forum exists for people who are hoping to get information, and not shut down contributors of information as has been the norm on other forums. If people don't like the information that anyone is presenting, the forum offers a feature for blocking other users. How To Ignore Users On The Forum Well if this is aimed at me, then I would say nothing I said is false. I made no personal attack as on the other forum you reference, only observations. If my comments were taken as negative comments I’m sorry they were not meant to be. That does bring up an interesting thought though. Only positive comments allowed, no room for discussion or debate on this forum ? I thought this was a forum for discussion which leads to information and knowledge. And as far as your blocking comment, doesn’t it work both ways? Maybe block me if my comments seem off line. Again I’m sorry if I offended anyone, not sure how many times it needs to be said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LE.JAG Posted January 31, 2020 Share Posted January 31, 2020 No problem for meanyone can ask questions ..the test in the air of the videois not intended to demonstrate the powerjust the speed of the pulseI will not talk about Tarscaci / not testfor the CTX if you have already tried a TDI pro / 14.4 vyou know it's deeper than a CTXfor me AQ is much more efficientmore sensitive / faster / quieterand therefore deeper = on goldCTX has been out of competition for a long timewe can't compare a 12 volt bbswith a high voltage PI / it's another world...about videosI always use a plastic box / port ventrallike the beginning / just fix AQ front on the boxit's just a practical questionAQ as standard is sealed ...I test future programming / upgradeAlexandre does 'perpetual' researchwith only one goal = to always do even better .. + on videos / I use the settings available as standardthe only notable differenceis the length of my cablewhich should make me lose some sensitivity (logically)but as you can seeI dig deep enough :)) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now