Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Tarz

Deep Lead Mullock Heaps

Recommended Posts

Is it worth while detecting old deep lead mullock heaps?

The heap I have in mind comprises of granite and ironstone rocks and kaolin clay. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clay and ironstone sounds ok. 

Granite not so much but maybe. 

Any quartz?  

Although if there are mullock heaps there must have been gold so forget the particulars of what rocks are there and just go beep on them  :laugh:.   You'll never never know if you never never go. :wink:

Welcome to the forum and we'd love to see pictures if you find some yellow stuff!!  

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Deep lead mines usually  only processed the pay dirt that was considered  profitable a certain distance above bedrock ( in Australia that was 6-12 feet and the rest was discarded onto the mullock . So whilst there is the odd chance there could be a unknown middle or upper level streak the miners discarded , that chance would be fairly low . There are miles of large deep lead mullock heaps in Creswick near Ballarat and they are mostly sticky yellow clay .The Australasian mine in creswick was Australia’s worst mine disaster  . If you can find small scale deep lead shafts the pay dirt was usually loaded on horse carts next to the shaft for transportation to the puddling mills and there was always some spillage . so these areas have some potential for detector prospectors.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ophirboy said:

Deep lead mines usually  only processed the pay dirt that was considered  profitable a certain distance above bedrock ( in Australia that was 6-12 feet and the rest was discarded onto the mullock . So whilst there is the odd chance there could be a unknown middle or upper level streak the miners discarded , that chance would be fairly low . There are miles of large deep lead mullock heaps in Creswick near Ballarat and they are mostly sticky yellow clay .The Australasian mine in creswick was Australia’s worst mine disaster  . If you can find small scale deep lead shafts the pay dirt was usually loaded on horse carts next to the shaft for transportation to the puddling mills and there was always some spillage . so these areas have some potential for detector prospectors.

These are the type of mullock piles I generally detect. Not deep leads as such but shallower pot hole digs & turned over gully floors & there discard piles. Same principle though. There was no water so the miners had to cart what they prospected as being a payable layer to the nearest water to work it. They would have of course have a bit of water for washing samples. When on to gold they of course threw out gold in their throw out piles as they dug down. The bonus for us detectorists is that their last & deepest shovel fulls chucked out ( & getting on to the gold layer) are now on top of the piles for our coils to hit on. So they have effectively reversed the natural ground deposits. In my situations if the piles are very fine clay or glacial silt they are usually barren of detectable gold. If there is a mixture of clay/dirt & gravels there is a much better chance of detectable gold being present. If the piles are very rocky & stoney with no clay & gravels, again not a good chance of gold being present. Some throw out piles just have that good look of the right kind of material that has the greatest chance of gold being with it. It is funny how you can walk up a turned over gully detecting  the throw out piles & see the change in the material & know the look of the better stuff.  It is worth waving a detector over all dumps as I guess the reason they are there is because gold was present.

Good luck out there

JW :smile: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do I understand then, that the kaolin clay washed away from the mine entrance, is not worth detecting?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the condensed answer is this , if it’s a small scale deep lead mine ( worked by a small group or syndicate there’s a chance of dropped or missed gold around the mullock and loading piles , on the other hand if the heaps are very large and extended you can put this down to large company deep lead mining and the chance of finding gold on these processed heaps is slim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me it just comes down to time and whether or not there are better options. Detecting anything is always going to be a gamble so all you can do is take your best shots with whatever time you have. Nobody can say with certainty that any given pile of dirt contains no gold. The nice thing about detecting is that it’s fairly easy and so when in doubt, detect anything that looks interesting and see what happens. Remember that many a nugget has been found by novices who were successful because they put their coil where an expert would not because “there can’t be any gold there”!

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By brad4555665
      It's not magnetic heavy kind of soft 


    • By Ronjas
      One year ago My husband and I decided to try our hand at metal detecting.We were total newbies with a steep learning curve. We purchased a used Xterra 705 for our starting machine. We downloaded and printed Randy Horton’s Xterra guide and have read it many times.  It is a valuable tool for any Xterra owner. We spent the last year educating ourselves on the basics of metal detecting and getting to know our machine. 
      We are feeling pretty confident about the Xterra except for one issue.  I am looking for advice on any errors we are committing or if we possibly have something wrong with our detector.  We have contacted minelab, but they never got back to us about our issue.  So here goes...
      We are having an issue with TID numbers with in ground silver. We have several old silver coins we use for testing.  They air test  perfectly per published Xterra TID charts. When we place a coin (dime, quarter or half dollar, doesn’t matter) in a dug plug and cover, the coins register as ferrous (-8, -6 or -4) every time regardless of the coil we have installed.  We have the stock 9” 7.5 kHz and the 6” 18.75 kHz Double D coils.  We cannot get silver to register as anything but ferrous in the ground.  The depth does not matter.  
      We usually run in all metal or discrim 1 on occasion.  We go through a set up each time we arrive at a place to detect that includes noise canceling, threshold, sensitivity and manual ground balance, although we usually detect in auto ground balance. We use 99 tones and silver in the ground has a ferrous “thunking” sound to go along with the TID numbers.
      We have reset to factory setting several times in the hope of solving this issue to no avail.  We are out of ideas and possibly need service.  Thank you for reading this far.  Any advice or suggestions are welcome and appreciated.  
       
       
    • By Fskafish
      I was wondering if anyone would want to share pictures of there display cases, not so much shadow boxes but anyone with larger display cases. I love old and nice ones so thought it would be cool to see some...ive got one i pulled out of a general store that opened in the 1930s and been working on it for awhile getting it cleaned up, also have a smaller one that i literally seen in a junk pile on the side of the road that ive been working on replacing rotten wood and for sum reason they lined the inside with wallpaper so been cleaning that up to.. i found the smaller one and amazingly the old glass didnt even have a crack in it..





    • By U_U
      When primary aim is finding meteorites (also with low iron/ nickel content), what metal detector would be a good idea to get (within budget)?
      Minelab Gold Monster 1000 (no manual ground balance, does this matter?)
      Minelab Equinox 600 (no real all metal mode??)
      Makro Multi Kruzer (how sensitive to small objects?)
      Makro Gold Kruzer (unknown when it will ship)
      Other detector (why?)
      Or do I need to spend more, i.e. get an XP Deus? I would very much appreciate any insight or even practical experience. Thank you very much for your time!
       
    • By Fskafish
      Got out with the equinox, got this old piece of brass i think. Does anyone know what this might be?


    • By Donnie
      Am wanting to purchase a Sdc 2300 all checks out on serial numbers etc and is a good price with many extras.
      my concern never using one before I set up three pieces of lead. 0.05g , 1.13g, 2.00g.
      i ran the Sdc over the three individual and the two larger pieces good solid signal up to 300mm lift.
      it would not pick up the 0.05g? Also ran it over 2.5g nugget yep good signal.
       
      i then ran my old AT Gold over the three same. As per the Sdc the AT went off and up to 300mm difference here is the AT picked up the 0.05g light signal but good solid number at around 50mm lift.
      AT also same on nugget.
      my question is shouldn’t the s
      Sdc have picked up the sub Gram lead?? Isn’t that what it is supposed to grab onto??
      Im a bit lost as to what to do now purchase/don’t purchase Can anyone confirm that it should have picked that up, could there be a problem with it.
       
      really want it but was expecting it to leave the AT Gold for dead??
       
      Thanks Guys
      Donnie
×