Jump to content
Website Rollback - Latest Updates ×

Axiom 13x11 GPX 4000 14x9 Coiltek Depth Test Deus 2 Also


Recommended Posts

"Golden Forest "-extra mineralized magnetite terain-- 6-7 bar  Fe3O4 mineralizacion  measured Teknetics G2..

IMG_20210627_094015_084.thumb.jpg.9687ab830449c7cdf729db81c8099f3b.jpg..----------------------------------------------------------------------

.....Alain, you are definitely using a test box that already has a moderate degree of mineralization... and therefore your results will be 20 or maybe even 25 percent less than it would be in the case of a test box with pure silica sand..
This only indicates how the depth of detection can change in a different type of terrain...

Since I myself have and use my low-mineralized test field, I can accurately assess the real range of various detectors in my test field... even a very deep 25 mm coin such as 50 eurocents is stably and regularly detected with good detectors with large 13"-15" coils on 38-39cm deep, which is 15.5" inches... Really amazing results..

But my colleagues have another 5-6 different mineralized.. test fields.. and there the depth of detection changes quickly according to the level of mineralization of the terrain..

since we also have an extra strongly mineralized terrain "Golden forest" .. it is at least at a similar level to Jeff's, it is really good to see how the results of his test really turn out to be similar to our results of the test of various vlf detectors .. or PI detector ..

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


10 hours ago, EL NINO77 said:

.....Alain, you are definitely using a test box that already has a moderate degree of mineralization... and therefore your results will be 20 or maybe even 25 percent less than it would be in the case of a test box with pure silica sand..
This only indicates how the depth of detection can change in a different type of terrain...

 

Pure silica sands : do you often have these "sandy "conditions in Slovaquia ?

I know that in the south east of Poland they have a lot of sandy areas because I have been several times there . This is not the case over here in the North of France where we rather have moderately to mid mineralized areas .. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In northern Slovakia, we have so-called sandy forests, although the situation can change after driving a few kilometers, and you will reach a band of sand and clay...or stone mineralization....
A similar situation also occurs in Spain, where I have terrains that are very light, even terrains with red soil.. or stony soil.. which are really mineralized..

but be careful... even in easy terrains, the size of the coil can be a limiting factor... and let's say that if you want to achieve the best depth results, you have to use larger 13-15" coils..
11" coils simply lose performance on the deepest targets..


That's why I'm very interested in how different detectors work in such areas... and what the practical depth of detection is...

Jeff's tests are generally conducted on heavily mineralized ... and it's really good to compare how different excellent detectors work in these conditions ...

It will be very interesting to see. if Jeff has the opportunity to compare PI detectors on larger coils...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/4/2024 at 2:33 PM, palzynski said:

3.2 gr is a little coin , on my tests which use a little mineralized soil my results are rather 20 to 23cms depth on such a coin and I have tested  a lot of detectors too ..  Only a 10g coin would be detected at 30cm on my bed tests .

You probably have an extremely low mineralized soil at your test location 

This 1911 US Barber silver dime was recovered yesterday, February 14th 2024. It is a little worn and weighs 2.24 grams. It was 10" deep. The Fisher F-Pulse pinpointer's total length is 9.5" and it does not reach the top of the hole. The 8" (20.5 cm) mark is clearly visible on the side of the pinpointer if you enlarge the photo.

I had my Deus 2 with 13X11" coil and Manticore with 11" coil with me at the time. Both detectors could detect this deep coin. There was aluminum and iron trash very close by this target and I had to remove those targets first just to make sure that this target was legitimate. Even after removing those adjacent shallower targets, the dime still had very "iffy" responses but I had both detectors setup well for high conductor target recovery for the soil conditions at this location. Any repeatable very high tone responses were investigated if they appeared to be deep according to the depth indicators and audio quality on both detectors. Both detectors clearly indicated a possible deep high conductor coin from the audio responses and from their target ID tendencies.

 

image.thumb.jpeg.661b1ae542ce2ef926b06841d73af619.jpeg

 

 

I did not take a picture of the iron mineralization reading on Deus 2 at the time. The photo included is one from a different hunt at the same location.

image.thumb.jpeg.1863162f5f792f260ebfa0bff9749fb6.jpeg

 

 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Jeff McClendon said:

This 1911 US Barber silver dime was recovered yesterday, February 14th 2024. It is a little worn and weighs 2.24 grams. It was 10" deep. 

I had my Deus 2 with 13X11" coil and Manticore with 11" coil with me at the time. Both detectors could detect this deep coin. There was aluminum and iron trash very close by this target and I had to remove those targets first just to make sure that this target was legitimate. Even after removing those adjacent shallower targets, the dime still had very "iffy" responses but I had both detectors setup well for high conductor target recovery for the soil conditions at this location. Any repeatable very high tone responses were investigated if they appeared to be deep according to the depth indicators and audio quality on both detectors. Both detectors clearly indicated a possible deep high conductor coin from the audio responses and from their target ID tendencies.

 

Thanks Jeff .. Then , to summarize :

5g coin ( conductive metal : silver or copper ) :
- VLF depth :   10"      ( 25cm )
- PI    depth :    13-14" ( 33-35cm )

Which confirms a 30-40% depth improvement for a PI vs a VLF , interesting ... 

Especially with the new Algoforce E1500 and its TID display , which allows selective searches  ..

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, palzynski said:

Thanks Jeff .. Then , to summarize :

5g coin ( conductive metal : silver or copper ) :
- VLF depth :   10"      ( 25cm )
- PI    depth :    13-14" ( 33-35cm )

Which confirms a 30-40% depth improvement for a PI vs a VLF , interesting ... 

Especially with the new Algoforce E1500 and its TID display , which allows selective searches  ..

In moderately mineralized soil.  This PI depth advantage wanes as soil becomes more neutral (less mineralized) as was discussed in the thread.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, palzynski said:

Thanks Jeff .. Then , to summarize :

5g coin ( conductive metal : silver or copper ) :
- VLF depth :   10"      ( 25cm )
- PI    depth :    13-14" ( 33-35cm )

Which confirms a 30-40% depth improvement for a PI vs a VLF , interesting ... 

Especially with the new Algoforce E1500 and its TID display , which allows selective searches  ..

For a 5 gram coin target and a recently made good quality SMF VLF with an 11" coil in moderate mineralization or less, I would expect 28 cm/11" for a 2 way hit, with or without proper ID.

For a 5 gram coin target and a PI with an 11" coil or slightly larger in moderate mineralization, I would consider down to 40.5 cm/16" to 46 cm/18" to be a reasonable goal for a decent 2 way hit.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chase Goldman said:

In moderately mineralized soil.  This PI depth advantage wanes as soil becomes more neutral (less mineralized) as was discussed in the thread.

Yes correct I should have said : in moderately mineralized soil 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Chase Goldman said:

In moderately mineralized soil.  This PI depth advantage wanes as soil becomes more neutral (less mineralized) as was discussed in the thread.

I hear this all the time, yet I don't agree especially when people state they are equal, as someone that tinkers a bit with mild soil situations all I see is PI goes deeper in very mild soils, noticeably deeper especially on larger targets like coins, on tiny gold PI and VLF are similar in depth but the bigger the target gets and using a coin as an example the PI wins, a coin on edge the VLF may catch up again a bit.  Some VLF's like the Manticore and CTX and gaining ground a bit but they are still not at PI / Mild soil depths.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...