Jump to content
Nuke em

Vanquish. My First Impressions After Buying It.

Recommended Posts

Yesterday i took my XP ORX to my dealer and swapped it for the Vanquish 540 Pro .

I know i have said a few things in the past about it and i said i wouldn't buy it . Well i have .

When i opened the box i saw the red (still yuk) , thank %$&* for a box cover lol

I unpacked it and put it together and apart from the awful colour i thought it was well made . Apart from the battery cover which i think will cause trouble . I think there will be a few breakages . I also noted the different shade of red of the cover. 

The control box buttons layout is fine but like other machines i have seen the coil lead goes into a tight spot in the side of the control box. Chubby fingers might not like that .

Unfortunately the upper 2 shafts are painted , they should have been Carbon Fiber , i can see the paint being chipped a lot like they do on the ET / Explorer's .

The stem locks look good but i dont like the coil bolt idea. Desi Dunne said that on his last video i saw before he passed away. Its a pity the middle shaft didn't collapse up above the top one like the Deus does . Could have collapsed to around 20 inches instead of 30 in.

The coils look a good size and the small one will be good for Irony / trashy places . Pity the target numbers weren't 99 instead of 40 .

I tested a few coins and the depth seems good at full sen's and the recovery speed seems good .

I checked my new Maz headphones to see if they worked with my adapter and they do , i also paired the headphones out of the box and listened to them . They seemed ok but both sets of headphones seemed quieter than if just going without headphones. That might affect targets being heard for the hard of hearing . 

I will also not be using the batteries out of the box , being only 1.2 volts and not 1.5 v that many disposable batteries have i will use disposables and use rechargables as back ups. I am used to getting a lot more power from batteries and Minelab's tendency to chuck any old stuff into the box ( batteries / Headphones ) lets them down and the RNB batteries of the ET prove that Minelab could do a lot better . 

On the Nox there was an update that helped with knocking out crown caps , i think the Vanquish could do with that update if it can be done.

Overall it looks not to bad a machine but like the Nox did it will have its place . I wont use it everywhere . As i think most that know me my ET is my main detector and Minelab will have to come up with something much better to prize my hand off that . 

I still think that Minelab have made a machine that looks to much like a red Garrett Ace just in time for Garrett to come up with something that might be a lot better at the same price ? 

I have to say the Vanquish is mega easy to set up . If Nokta/ Makro didn't think of it Minelab could have called this machine the Simplex . I will call it " Piece of q!55 " . I hope it finds my beaches a piece of q!55.

If my beaches look right late next week i will use the 540 then . Before that i need to find some bicycle tyre innertube to put over the upper painted shaft to stop it scratching on the stones on the beach . 

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Nuke em said:

Pity the target numbers weren't 99 instead of 40 .

I'm complaining the same bad tendancy by Minelab,  compressing tid scale since the Nox was launched.

I'm tired by the old Ctx, but still can't leave it to rest due to the multiple tid numbers type.I suggest You to try soon as you can any kind of gold ring/chain/ear ring and any other thing you might like to find in the beach, with the hope to obtain playing with the few settings a different id number from different objects.

I said those Minelab vlf with compressed tid scale are dig it all machines unless you want to leave gold down with supposed trash or coins reading.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Nuke em said:

...

Unfortunately the upper 2 shafts are painted , they should have been Carbon Fiber , i can see the paint being chipped a lot like they do on the ET / Explorer's ....

Overall it looks not to bad a machine but like the Nox did it will have its place . I wont use it everywhere . As i think most that know me my ET is my main detector and Minelab will have to come up with something much better to prize my hand off that . ...

I have to say the Vanquish is mega easy to set up . If Nokta/ Makro didn't think of it Minelab could have called this machine the Simplex . I will call it " Piece of q!55 " . I hope it finds my beaches a piece of q!55.

Carbon fiber yes but carbon is expensive so that the Vanquish price would not have been the same with carbon shafts. However I have replaced the lower and middle shafts on mine with carbon shafts , this was rather to save weight than protecting the paint ... Actually. I saved around 100grams with these 2 carbon shafts ...

Yes the Vanquish is very easy to set up , no mess with the settings , just set the sens to max , choose the detection mode , and the machine is ready to use ...

Vanquish 540 vs Etrac , the Vanquish will be lighter 1,3kg vs 1,8kg . I have been using an Explorer XS in the 2000s and this machine is not the lightest ... I am not a beach specialist I use my Vanquish inland only , however I am looking forward for your beach tests with the Vanquish... 

 

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, palzynski said:

Carbon fiber yes but carbon is expensive so that the Vanquish price would not have been the same with carbon shafts. However I have replaced the lower and middle shafts on mine with carbon shafts , this was rather to save weight than protecting the paint ... Actually. I saved around 100grams with these 2 carbon shafts ...

Yes the Vanquish is very easy to set up , no mess with the settings , just set the sens to max , choose the detection mode , and the machine is ready to use ...

Vanquish 540 vs Etrac , the Vanquish will be lighter 1,3kg vs 1,8kg . I have been using an Explorer XS in the 2000s and this machine is not the lightest ... I am not a beach specialist I use my Vanquish inland only , however I am looking forward for your beach tests with the Vanquish... 

 

I think my next search will be with ET , after that the 540 . Probably Saturday next week. Work till then.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/10/2020 at 1:55 AM, Nuke em said:

On the Nox there was an update that helped with knocking out crown caps , i think the Vanquish could do with that update if it can be done.

Unlikely since the Equinox update was derived from Vanquish in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Steve Herschbach said:

Unlikely since the Equinox update was derived from Vanquish in the first place.

Pity , I have seen that the Vanquish loves Crown caps .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Nuke em said:

Pity , I have seen that the Vanquish loves Crown caps .

I have never relied on Equinox iron bias for crown caps.  In my experience dealing with crown caps at the beach with the Nox,  crown caps do give primarily high tones, so those less adept at picking up the telltale clues are often fooled.  Specifically, they give notoriously unstable target ID readings and marked iron grunts off the coil edge when in AM.  They are pretty easy to ID in that manner and I will usually move on without bothering to even scoop them to be certain.  I have no reason to believe that the Vanquish would not behave similarly.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Sandheron
      Adds iron volume and some other stuff. https://www.minelab.com/usa/vanquish-software-update-1
      VANQUISH 540 Iron Volume Control
      Detecting in heavy iron trash is enhanced with the new Iron Volume Control feature. 10-step adjustments let you decrease the volume of iron all the way down to a whisper, while leaving desirable targets (non-ferrous) loud and clear. To engage Iron Volume Control, simply hold down the All Metal button, while simultaneously using the Volume buttons to adjust to your liking.
      General Improvements for All VANQUISH Models
      The upgrade also includes improved battery handling capability for all models, as well as a new low battery alert.

       
    • By ColonelDan
      Anyone interested in a report on the 440 can find it here:
      https://www.kellycodetectors.com/pages/field-test-minelab-vanquish-440-metal-detector/
      My hunting buddy Gary and I collaborated on the report for Kellyco and they published it on their website.
      We found this a very impressive machine for $279 but you can read the report and judge for yourself.
      Note: Gary and I are not employees of Kellyco nor do we have any financial interest in or relationship with Kellyco.



    • By Steve Herschbach
      I read with wide eyed wonder a thread on another forum where it is stated that with the high Vanquish iron bias setting, or higher Equinox iron bias settings, that a dime stacked on a nickel returns a ferrous result. This has been called a bug, and some rather strident demands are being made that Minelab do something about it “or suffer the consequences.”
      Iron bias is a variable filter, and the using it is a direct trade off. On an Equinox the F2 setting of 0 is as close to “off” as you can get. You will get nearly all non-ferrous and lots of ferrous will identify as non-ferrous. As you increase the control to maximum, less ferrous items will identify as non-ferrous, but more non-ferrous items will identify as ferrous.
      It is a direct trade, one for the other. There is no free lunch. If you run iron bias at max, you will miss good items. Period. End of story. There is no fix. It’s not a bug. It is the way the filter works. Either leave it at its lowest setting, or accept that when you run it higher you will miss many non-ferrous items. Including nickels and dimes stacked together. Or get another detector.
      Metal detectors do not know ferrous from non-ferrous. They know phase and eddy current decay. You can also filter on things like target consistency, etc. Iron bias is not a magic ferrous filter. It is looking at something, I’m not sure what exactly. However, ferrous items often give off multiple target id numbers in rapid succession, and this might be a consistency filter of some sort. It is not a ferrous/non-ferrous filter. Again, a detector does not see ferrous or non-ferrous.
      Apparently a dime stacked on a nickel triggers this filter at a higher setting. I can understand how that might happen if it is a consistency filter. What I can’t understand is why that is a major freak out event. The manual says there is a cost to running high iron bias (see below). Anyone that knows anything at all about metal detector filters should know there are no free lunches. That’s why I always run all my filters as low as possible on all detectors I use. Did I know specifically about dimes stacked on nickels? No. Could I really care less? Not really. I do not think there are thousands, hundreds, or even dozens of dimes stacked on nickels that I am missing, even if I ran iron bias at max. But I do not. I always run it at 0 unless I use a default mode where there is some cranked in and forget to set it to zero. I run 50 tones and between the tones and high 39 spikes do not get fooled by ferrous enough to think I need employ the iron bias in any situation except perhaps a field full of flat tin steel.
      I hunt gold nuggets a lot, and one thing that does is teach a person a lot about filters. All ferrous / non-ferrous filtering, no matter the type, with misidentify some gold as ferrous, especially in high mineral ground. I will never forget a gold nugget that I saw the Gold Bug 2 disc mode call ferrous in an air test. Or the .22 shell casing my F75 and Gold Bug Pro called ferrous sitting in plain view on top of some particular ground. Real eye openers. This also applies to any coins at depth, right at the point where they almost disappear. In most ground the signal will flip from non-ferrous to ferrous at extreme range. It’s how detectors work, and calling it all bugs just means a person does not know how a detector works. Or that all detectors have bugs, take your pick. I’ve actually written entire articles about it.
      Some people have a high tolerance for digging trash to get good items others miss. Others really hate digging trash, and employ high filtering i.e. discrimination and other filters. They should know, or need to know, that if they are digging no trash, they are leaving good items in the ground. Every filter comes at a cost in this regard, some more, some less, but the only thing that insures missing no good targets is to use all metal and dig everything. Even then, the ground balance filter will leave good items in the ground.
      Anyway, good luck to those expecting Minelab to publicly address the dime on nickel “bug” and good luck seeing it get fixed. In my opinion it is inherent in the filter and the way it works, and the way to avoid it is to run the filter at the lower settings. Or get another detector if you are a person that specifically hunts dimes stacked on nickels.
      Equinox Manual, page 52 (emphasis added):
      All ferrous targets produce a combination of a ferrous and nonferrous response. Large ferrous targets can even present a stronger non-ferrous response. Also, a ferrous target adjacent to a nonferrous target can produce a similar response.
      The Iron Bias Setting provides some control over the Target ID response. A lower Iron Bias setting will allow the natural response to dominate which means that the target is more likely to be classified as a non-ferrous target. A higher setting will increase the likelihood that the target is classified as iron.

      In environments with dense iron trash, a higher Iron Bias is recommended in order to mask them. In areas where you do not want to miss any non-ferrous targets amongst iron trash, a lower setting is recommended. This will cause more ferrous targets to be detected and identified as desirable non-ferrous targets.
    • By Bash
      So I've been getting a lot of clad coins with both the Equinox and the Vanquish 440 in the local parks, but even in the older ones, silver coins have escaped me for a couple of months now.  In between thunderstorms this afternoon, I hit the neighbor's parking strip, and in less than ten minutes, I pulled two silvers and a wheatie!  My first silver quarter, AND my first Canadian silver. The quarter is pretty trashed, but I'm glad just the same!
      Felt good to break the slump!




    • By Bash
      Found this Crackerjack Mystery Club coin yesterday with the Vanquish.  These were distributed from 1933 to 1934.


    • By Tometusns
      First time on the beach so it was a new experience for me. The Vanquish ran very quiet over the dry and wet sand. I was able to run the sensitivity maxed 99% of the time. No great finds but did get some deep and some small targets. I ran in the jewelry mode with 1 notched out. Couple opals found about 15ft. apart I'm sure they came from the same piece of jewelry. A sterling earring back along with another small silver(?) piece off something and a fake coin that I at least said hmmm when I first dug it Lol . Plenty of clad coins. I almost (almost) quite digging those 10 plus inch zinc signals but it was a good experience. Thanks for looking! Tom
       


×
×
  • Create New...