Jump to content

Minelab Responds To Critical You-tuber


strick

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, TampaBayBrad said:

I don't like the way the guy chose to edit his new video trying to explain what Mark explained to him what facts were wrong with his original video.

Why go to all this "Here's this part of the video from yesterday' and then insert a rambling interpretation of what you think Mark said.

Just say "This is what I said yesterday and this is what Mark had to say about that."

So much easier than muddying the waters on what was wrong about your original video and what you now know is correct after talking/corresponding with Mark.

 

I agree on this one. I usually like his videos. Except for some of his sound effects and comedic bits he sometimes throws in. These were a bit strange. But I do give him credit for getting a response/reply from ML. Nobody else seems to get a reaction. Better than that other guy , who I just don't watch anymore.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Honestly this is all old hat. The TX Boost on the V3i bumped the voltage to the coil for 10V to 30V. White's could have made a big deal about this 200% gain in power. But they did not. They said this instead (V3i Manual page 48):

Tx Boost – (On / OFF) Over-power the search coil to supercharge depth. Note; Causes rapid battery discharge and is susceptible to noise & overload. Recommended for very low mineralized grounds. Also recommended for high external electrical (EMI) interference, (Tx Boost ON, reduce Rx Gain, Discrimination, and All Metal sensitivity as necessary to regain stable performance).

Sound familiar?

The stupid exceeds FCC limitations objection BS is also an old one, comes up every few years. It was BS then and is BS now. Half the videos I’ve seen are just people putting their ignorance on public display. Luckily for them most of their audiences also don’t seem to know any better.

Search Coils Are Not Antenna

Metal Detectors and More Depth

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 50% more power to the coil is the new obsolete single frequency metal detectors statement.   It's done as a headline grabber, pure marketing and it worked, everyone's talking about it.

They're different in the way the Equinox did cause a bit of a stir and in fact other manufacturers must agree as anyone capable of making a multi frequency machine now has, they knew they had to if they wanted to stay in the game.

I wonder if Nokta and possibly others follow with their next detectors claiming 60% more power to the coil.

While not a bogus claim, it really doesn't mean much by the looks of it in overall performance, it certainly isn't increasing small target sensitivity such as gold nuggets, 2-3 cm extra depth on a 30cm target? Almost immeasurable in the real world.

Minelab responded as his videos with a lot of followers were possibly damaging to sales of a new detector that they desperately need to sell a lot of, sales have been a bit slow for them lately, according to their shareholder announcements.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/3/2023 at 1:43 AM, phrunt said:

While not a bogus claim, it really doesn't mean much by the looks of it in overall performance, it certainly isn't increasing small target sensitivity such as gold nuggets, 2-3 cm extra depth on a 30cm target? Almost immeasurable in the real world

Bottom line. It was a marketing ploy of which many took the bait. All reports seem to convey that it is a excellent beach machine with great depth. I also believe with a new update in the future the iron issues should be resolved. For me though the jury is still out on the proprietary head phones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I watched his first video I was thinking this was his best act yet...it’s all an act even though he says he is looking for the truth that is one of his acts as well. Acting for viewers.... I mean no teacher is that ignorant to not do some basic research before slamming minelab like that and mocking the head engineer the way he did...I do give him an A+ for getting minelab to respond to some joe blow on the internet..I haven’t seen that before. And I’ll bet Lawrie is getting a good razzing from his fellow engineers at work about that lightning bolt super hero thingy lol. 

Strick

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, strick said:

 I’ll bet Lawrie is getting a good razzing from his fellow engineers at work about that lightning bolt super hero thingy lol. 

Strick

Ha ha. That's exactly what I thought when I saw that.

I saw the video mere minutes after he posted it. I fully expected it to be taken down in a day or so, and a possible lawsuit happening. I mean, he outright claimed a company is lying based on poor evidence and incomplete technical knowledge. If it was me, I would have titled the video as, "IS Minelab lying to us?". That one extra word would wash my hands of any legal repercussions.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...