Steve Herschbach

Both but mostly the lower frequency.

I added the direct link to the Yreka page which is a bit easier to get too. Thanks Bob!

Yeah, the year is sneaking by fast. I was pretty much betting on 2016 but my sights have now shifted to 2017. Personally I would prefer they take whatever time it needs to get out the door 100% right. It would however be a nice Christmas gift from First Texas to us!

Hi Ray, I am happy to help but it may be tomorrow morning before I make a detailed reply. Thanks!

I thought it would be interesting to revive this thread in light of the release of the GPZ19 coil to see how close Minelab came to the suggestions. I tallied up the numbers and averaged the large dimension for both small and large suggested sizes but all the info is there to draw your own conclusions. Next up - I want that small coil. I do think larger first was best for most people but sooner or later a small coil for the rest of us would be appreciated.

Man oh man that has got to be exciting Bob. Chris and I hope to be doing a little of the same later this summer. Best of luck to you!!

Actually the last thread on the subject is at but nothing new since then.

That's exactly what I use - a small mesh goody bag with a cow magnet in the bottom to keep hair pins and wire from slipping out. I generally pick up any other surface trash I see and make a show of putting it in the trash cans. No problem here folks, just cleaning up the beach!

Great first outing Dean! The GPX 4500 is a real bang for the buck machine for sure.

A well done review not only of field performance but the physical attributes of the MX Sport at http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,108553

There should be a warranty on the repair so best bet would be to contact White's again. Besides, what about the person that buys your detector - are you going to disclose it is not functioning properly?

Rob, you are way smarter than I, just digging fabulous stuff and skipping the trash - why did I not think of that? I have found a lot of gold rings over the years but have been shy in gemstones. You are killing it!

I am glad it made you feel better because that was the goal. Way too often all we see is a picture of the gold or coin etc. with no context of how much junk got dug to make it happen. It does lead to unrealistic expectations for the new people looking at the forums. I can cherry pick with the best of them when it comes to coins but if you want gold you are going to dig a lot of stuff that is not gold.

Well, if any of you guys are paying more than a cent for a copper penny let me know and I will sell them to you instead of Coinstar!

Good eyes Chris - all I saw was pick digging, totally missed person (me) in background.

The finds were on the dry beach Fred. 95% of my beach rings come out of the water. I actually was hoping more for old coins. People have been on those beaches since the mid 1800s losing stuff. I did lean more to low tones for that reason so my finds are heavy on the change. I did get a few square nails so old coins will happen at some point once I find the magic spot. As it was all I got was a single wheat back penny. I generally do not mind trash as long as the digging is easy, and it gets no easier than the beach. Besides, somebody has to clean it up so may as well be me! All that park stuff is tot lots or popping shallow targets with a screwdriver - no hole digging.

You can edit a screen so that light areas go beep and gray areas do not (target rejected). All the frame does it let you choose how many blocks to edit at a time. If you need to block out a big chunk a larger edit frame makes sense. if you are working on the details and for areas that are not exactly square smaller frame sizes are needed. The 1 x 1 block corresponds to exactly one place on the screen that has one reading, like 12-24. If you just wanted to block 12-24 you use the 1 x 1 frame and turn that location gray. Very few items read that tight, so you might want to block every reading surrounding 12-24 (11-23, 11-24, 11-25, 12-23, 12-25, 13-23, 13-24, and 13-25). This would mean you had to edit nine locations one at a time using the 1 x 1 frame. Or you could use a 3 x 3 frame and block that whole 9 segment area in one shot. Default is 3 x 3 (nine segment block). The largest 5 x 5 knocks out 25 segments at one time. That is all it is - an editing function. It does nothing else except block out or open areas on the screen. If you always use a wide open screen it is a useless function because all frame size is for is setting up white/gray patterns on a hunt screen. An example http://www.minelab.com/usa/treasure-talk/beach-hunting-with-the-ctx-3030-part-3

It's all in the photos except the nuggets. Next step is loose change gets added to existing pile and heads to a Coinstar machine next week (too busy now). I will post a picture of that pile and what it cashes in for next week.

This thread is so people don't think metal detecting is just digging good stuff. I do a lot of detecting where I just toss stuff in a pile for sorting later. Time to clean house so here are a few piles and some notes. First up - learning session with Minelab GPZ 7000 at Lake Tahoe beach. Fresh water lake but very mineralized beaches, loaded with magnetite sands and hot rocks. Just digging everything, and did find a ring, but just a little silver one with fake stones. Basically coins except nickels and zinc pennies go lo-hi tone. Only other lo-hi tones normally nails. Everything else hi-lo tones. First photo the pile, next photo sorted out so you can see most common trash items. Call this BEACH TRASH Next up mostly stuff found nugget detecting, but also some park detecting snuck into that pile. The sorted pile shows trash you might find nugget detecting. Nuggets of course got pocketed as found so nothing to show there. Call this NUGGET DETECTING TRASH. Extra photo showing volume of small trash targets not worth trying to sort out.... And finally some park detecting with various detectors, mostly DFX and Gold Racer plus Racer 2 and Deus. I am digging a lot of trash items for educational/learning purposes while comparing machines. The sorted pile only shows common trash; I discarded all the weird stuff. Call this PARK TRASH. Anyway, I hope this shows that it is not all digging "good stuff" and also an idea what the most common trash items are for people who have not done this sort of thing before.

If that is the case the patent application will be rejected. Want to make a bet Rick? On reflection though I don't care enough to bet - just information for people to ponder is all.

I have never heard of anything found at the Caribou Creek site except fine float gold.

There is no doubt Minelab files lots of patents. Since 2000 more than all the other players combined. They are given a lot of grief over how the patents are written and just how new some of them really are, but this is a part of the detecting game Minelab seems to have mastered. They not only come up with new methods, but have been very good the last twenty years at blocking progress at other companies by way of patents. The number one reason I heard from the competition over the years about why nobody made units that seriously competed with the Minelab PI detectors was.... patents. I actually am a bit surprised how few patents relating to basic detecting technology are filed by most of the competition these days, the only real exception being White's. First Texas has been active, but almost all relate to a walk through detector. Garrett has a new one for a waterproof housing design, but that's about it.

Now that's a chunk of gold - good work Rick!

What strick said. The accept/reject function does allow you to choose how many blocks to edit at once, but it is just an editor option. When I think sizing I tend to think in terms of "sizing the target" via the pinpointing methodology to help determine whether the item found is dime sized or sprinkler head sized. I tend to hunt wide open screen with full tones so I rarely reject items outright. That being the case this function gets little use on my machine.

For many years dredging was about the only way I found gold in Akaska. As a mining method it is far more reliable and consistent than metal detecting. However, with extreme low gold prices around 1998 I hung it up as too much miserable cold work. My last major use of a gold dredge was about three years ago. Ironically I figured when I moved south I would take it back up again, the attraction of warm water being too incredible to ignore. The minute I made the move the moratorium was imposed in California. So much for that idea. I did sell most of my gear when I left Alaska but I do have a few odds and ends to dispose of. The only thing air related I have left is a hookah regulator which I will put in classifieds today.