Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Mike Hillis

My Requirements For A Micro / Tiny / Small Jewelry Detector

Recommended Posts

Hunting tiny gold jewelry in inland sites is just so different from mainstream detecting methods that unless you do it you don't understand the requirements.    

#1.   EMI stability.   Your detector has to be stone cold stable.  No spurious noise.  None.  The signals you are after are small tight signals and you can’t hear them if your detector is making spurious noises.

#2.   The detector needs to be able to keep its HOTs at low gain/sensitivity settings because:

a... You need to be able to focus on the right depth of signals and those tiny signals are not deep.  Most of the time they are just down in the grass roots.   You want to focus only on the top three to four inches of depth.   If you have to run your sensitivity at or near max all you are doing is masking the desired signal response with reports from all the other signals surrounding it and below it.  And in cases where the ground minerals are high, the ground itself will mask the response.  

b... You need to control the coil foot print.  In this type of hunting you don’t want coil edge surface responses.  You only want to hear what is directly under your coil.   Concentric coils work better at this than DD coils.  DD coils are ok but you get better footprints with concentric and tighter readings on your meter.

#3.  The higher the operating frequency, the more important the above become.  As the operating frequency goes up, the level of discrimination goes down because the trash targets hit harder and sound better.   In other words, the higher the operating frequency the better the trash sounds and responds.

#4.  Notch discrimination or some other form of discrimination that will allow you to focus just on the signal range you are hunting.   The only range of signals you are interested in are in the ferrous/non-ferrous boundary range and the foil range up to maybe the nickel reading.   All other signals are distractions.

I'm editing to add a number #5.   Tiny signal audio boost is a big plus if it can be deployed while keeping original signal response integrity.  

I'll close with this.....You can take a gold prospecting unit onto a woodchip playground or a sand pit and as long as it can handle the EMI you can hunt with it on normal settings.  But if you are targeting sites  where good quality, tiny jewelry is most likely to be present, you will be working a lot of turf sites where a prospecting detector's normal feature set isn't going to be very helpful. 

HH

Mike

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great concrete advice - based on experience.  I know you aren’t into PI’s, but consider this.

The Manta PI, which is now in the process of final development by Fisher might make an interesting tiny gold finder.

It has a very short minimum pulse delay - 8μ seconds or so.  that should make it able to detect all but the tiniest gold, especially at the shallow depths you are talking about.  The sensitivity is variable and it ID’s or excludes all but huge ferrous as well as high conductors. the set point for that control is variable. 

The testing up to now of this device has been pretty  Much at the beach because it is designed to be a killer on gold in salt water.  It hasn’t - as far as I know - been tested in the environemnts you are talking about.  I suspect with the correct adjustment of controls it might prove a killer in the grass and in tot lots.

Maybe Fisher should let you test it for that.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rick,

Anything can hunt a tot lot,   If you want to hunt tiny targets in a tot lot, just get a normal high frequency gold prospecting unit and have at it.  Totlots and sand lots you dig everything just because you can, its easy to dig everything.

Turf is where the restriction is at.   You can't dig everything in turf and you don't want to dig everything in turf.   It will look like the top of Hacksaw Ridge in a very short period of time if you try to dig everything in these turf spots.  

I had a Whites TDI for a season.  The two biggest drawbacks I had with the TDI was 1)  it lumped small non-ferrous and small ferrous targets together.   I couldn't tell a paper staple from an earring.   and 2) the ridiculous coil control it required to keep the ground from responding.   As long as the ground was flat and I kept the coil 3 inches or higher off the ground I had a silent detector but in uneven ground every irregularity made it report, which resulted in having to keep the coil even higher off the ground and, if I didn't keep my mind in the game, staying on top of identifying what was sounding off, the ground or a target,  I could end up chasing a ground surface irregularity like it was a target.   It did work well for high conductors, however.

So....the Manta PI would need to have small ferrous rejection, (no staple responses) with some form of ground balance to kill the surface irregularity responses, and some form of discrimination to limit what reports.    8 ns is extremely low and will be somewhat like hunting with a high frequency VLF.   Everything is going to report.   There will need to be some low conductive non-ferrous discrimination.   The only way you can do non-ferrous discrimination like this with a PI is by measuring multiple PI pulse delays:   Hits at 8 ns, still hitting at 11 ns, don't give an audio response.  Hits at 8 ns, decay is complete by 11 ns, give an audio response or a meter reading or whatever.   Last I checked they haven't started making these yet where you can dial in a bottom and a top pulse delay range.  

As of now the Whites V3/V3i is the only detector on the market today that can kind of do that by comparing the 22kHz and the 3kHz signals real time so that you can see and compare the results at the same time.   22kHz screams on everything,  the 3 kHz say mass, no mass.  Audio signal gives target size hints    However their coils aren't really built with a tight enough null so there is an inherent limitation to signal size beyond frequency limitations.  But it works.

If Fisher gets something designed that can hunt that environment I would be happy to prove it.

HH

Mike    

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good view, Mike..., at Spectra is a dimensionally good-sensitive and stable Vrated and Emi resilient coil - it is the foundation for this detector ... For example 6x4 shooter is low RX gain is1050266751_iphoneMarec52018013_DxO.jpg.98e7e245d11bb7b5273ab94ebacc511b.jpg low sensitive to small things ...

well there are also differences in range at different frequencies and multi 3F
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

iphone 5S marec 6 001_DxO.jpg

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the feedback Mike.  By the end of the year, I hope, you might get a chance to play with one!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rick.  Maybe so.  Maybe not.   I got a call from someone's shipping department a couple of weeks back wanting to send me something.  I was busy and focused on the task at hand only listening with half an ear and declined shipment.   I don't even know who it was that called or what company they were with.   I think I thought it was a phishing scam to get my info and in any event I was in a hurry to get off the phone and not loose my focus.  

El Nino77, that is some work you have done.  I'll have to take some time to review it closer than I have.  

HH
Mike

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Similar Content

    • By kac
      Found this in my yard messing around with my detector. Never said it was valuable.

    • By kac
      Hit a park that used to be an estate then run by Nuns for many years then turned over to the town as a park. There is approx. 10 acres or so and most of it over grown so I figured I would hit some of the area that has been flattened down by the winter before it grows back in. Surprisingly there is tons of stuff there and doesn't seem to have been detected on. In just a few passes in a small area I found a really old remnants of a button with no marks, handful of pocket change, 18k gold earing .037oz and this old dime in pretty descent shape. New stuff dropped is probably from people sledding down the hill side.

    • By mn90403
      I went out this afternoon on the beach in 20 mph winds and about 58 degrees so it was going to feel nippy.  This trip I put on the right jacket.  It is one that I found in the surf a few years ago.  It is a Port Authority jacket made in Vietnam.  It's kinda like a ski jacket but wow, I was not bothered at all.  Normally I have about 3-4 layers and can still feel the wind blowing through!
      On to the hunt, I found the chain as a result of seeing another detectorist closing in in front of me and I wanted to go back the way I came.  I had just dug a coin and about 5 feet away I got a 2 on my 800 in beach 1 at 23 sensitivity.  I swung on it a couple of times because this is normally junk on my beaches but I was in the right area to dig most everything so I did.  I saw the glitter in the scoop and of course I had to hide it from my fellow detectorist so he wouldn't come over and share my potential patch.  haha  Later I put it down on the sand and I got a reading of 6.  Funny thing is that it didn't chirp like some targets.  It was just a solid signal.  (It is a combination of .575 and .375 gold and weighs 4.8 grams.)
      About an hour later on my way back not more than a couple hundred feet from the chain I got a 21.  It was solid and full sounding.  It wasn't quite like the pennies which chatter sometimes and go from 15 to 22.  I somewhat expected a penny but it is .925 silver.  It is missing the stone that was mounted on the top but silver is silver!  (It weighs 2.7 grams.)
      I would have liked more for 3 hours of detecting but there were no swells to move more sand.
      Mitchel


    • By Cheese
      I spent a couple of hours in the local park today, using the Nox 800 with the 6" coil, and found my first gold. The target ended up being 7 gram gold teeth 😀 and TID was 10.
      I also found a bunch of change. All of these quarters were in the same hole.
      I feel like I am starting to get the hang of this. 
      It has been pretty fun so far!


    • By sullivan2002
      Hi to app.
      I have a Nox 600 since 1 year and I used here in Italy to find everywhere  generally on beaches but not only.
      I choosed to buy the 600 instead of the 800 version due to the fact that here I can't find native Gold but this is my opinion that for me Nox 800 was wasted.
      I found just 4 Gold little items last year and I made a lot of work for that. I digged a lot on beaches and I digged from VDI 1 to VDI 29 in Beach 1 and 2 depending of near the sea or just in the Sand. As I remember 3 little rings  at VDI 6, 10 and 12.
      Now what I want to ask you in your experience is:
      Is it ok to stay with 600? Or could be very different for finding gold rings in the beach (my possibile gold items here are just rings and other little items on beach, no native gold nuggets...)
      Is a good idea to change mi finding way to All Metal mode?
      I used generally 5 tones. Do you advice me to start Learning the 50 tones in the way that I could choose to dig low ID (2 to 12) and be more helpful to find gold instead of tinfoil. Now the probability that from VDI 2 to 12 could be gold items la very low just looking at the target ID.
      In your esperience with Equinox which trick or method you advise me most for the search for gold objects like rings or earrings or small objects on the beach?
      Thank you very much. Every SUGGESTION is appreciated.
      I would like to see a table of VDI made by you diggers  to compare it with mine on attachment related to findings here in Italy:

      Best
      Pat
       
             
    • By Mike Hillis
      You either have the right metal detector for micro jewelry detecting or you don't. 

      I hunt gold jewelry on land. It is my desired target. I focus on it to the near exclusion of all else. I hunt for hot spots and when I find them I prep them for efficient recovery of new losses. It is what I like to do. And I find pretty small jewelry. Too small to even take good pictures of with my current camera. So I thought I was doing pretty good. Maybe using the term 'Micro' was splitting hairs. 

      I had asked Tom Dankowski what to use for a Micro Jewelry test piece. He replied back that a 10k White Gold 4 or 6 prong stud earring capable of holding, what? a 1/4 or 1/2 caret stone would be a recommended test object. So I went searching for something and finally obtain something at the right price off of ebay; 3mm solid 10k white gold 4 prong stud earring. Silicone backing. So its just the earring stud itself with a topaz stone in it. Pretty tiny. Smaller than I thought it would be when I ordered it. 

      Ok. The Gold Bug Pro is a proven prospecting unit, and my G2+ is nothing more than a Gold Bug Pro on a different rod set up. I've seen the pictures of the small gold pickers it can find. So surely it will hit this earring no problem, Rght? 

      Well, I put the 5" DD on it, and start bench testing. All metal gets a hit on it out to about 1-1/2" if the prong end of the earring is facing it. Horizontal and Vertical orientation presentations are much less. In Disc, I can get a signal about an 1" away with the prong facing the coil and the other orientations are about 1/2" with mostly non-ferrous responses. That is at maxed out sensitivity. Wow. I thought it would be better than that. 

      I have a V3 with a 22kHz single frequency option with a hot gold program on it that will hit it good, too. Right? 

      Well I put the 4x6 DD on the V3, load up my hot little gold program and start my test. Hey, I'm getting something, thinking positive...better depth than the gold bug, oh...wait....its picking up my hand. So I transfer the earring stud to a ruler and try again. This time no response. Or at least no usable response. Did some tweaking to the program and still no thing. Wow. Got to try some programming changes and see if I can at least equal the G2. 

      Not done yet......what about the Omega 8500. No. Not a chance of every finding one these little earrings with that. Put it up. 

      Still not done yet....what about the F75LTD? Lets give it a try. I put the little football concentric on it, maxed it out and frequency shifted for stability and give it a try. WOW. In both JE and Boost mode it did better than the G2. The G2 audio wasn't that strong but the F75 audio was great in all orientations. And I was getting at least an 1" in the vertical and horizontal orientations and about a 1-1/3" with the prongs facing the coil. And it was giving mostly non-ferrous TID. This reminded me again of what a top notch detector the F75 is and will always be. 

      Wow. Just Wow. I ended up sitting there thinking about how much time I have wasted at some sites thinking that if 'any' gold was there I would have gotten it. I got over it a day or so later as reality set in and reminded me that hunting really small jewelry has its own little focus and that I need not worry about unless I'm specifically hunting for it. But that if I'm going to hunt for it I need to equipment myself for it. 

      And that is the back story to my pre-order of the Makro Gold Kruzer. 

      HH 
      Mike
×
×
  • Create New...