EL NINO77

Simon .... you have a good idea., .. all you need to do is repack the V340 electronics and coil into an improved GO-Find body.

This is a good question Chase .., although Minelab does not inform about it in manuals, it is possible that in extremely strong mineralization lowering TX to 1/3 of ... maximum TX, can also work the same as with Equinox ..

I just want to say that earth tests are fair...especially if you add other competitive detectors to the test to compare real-time performance... ... Do not forget that all the detectors are tested on various test fields during the development. Never go straight from the lab to the field for detection .. .And then these detectors are real tested in the terain. In different situations ... where the detector is still tuned ... I consider both tests essential. It shows the technical quality of the detector ... And ... Finally, the practice of satisfied users will decide on the success of the project ...

This coil...vista X is practically a 9 "coil ..... but a length of 11" ... I consider them a progressive design and a very good idea ... according to me the shape of this straight side center part of this coil will provide a good deep detection window, while the tapered front and side tents will ensure good and better 2D separation over a similarly large circular , oval, or SEF..type coil ... .... if this 9 "x11" X Coil.. design is deeply the same with the 11 "DD Pitbul coil, ... it's hard to say ... but the impact on coin size things can be comparable .. This spool vista X is practically a 9 "coil ..... but a length of 11" ... I consider them a progressive design and a very good idea ... according to me the shape of this straight side center part of this coil will provide a good deep detection window, while the tapered front and side tents will ensure good and better 2D separation over a similarly large circular , oval, or SEF..type coil ... For an absolutely accurate comparison I could do .... if such an "X" coil was also available for Vista Gold gain 30khz. model .. What is the optimal size and design of DD coil is the best ...? See for yourself ... I'll write a little bit more about this in the topic "" Why is Airtest important? " This article will be devoted to Airtests on a variety of large and conductive objects -to a properly set detector and coil for a given type of terrain .... as well as its real reach ... in this terrain...

Daniel ... as a strong magnetite mineralization ... has Black Sand in Tenerife? ..

In my test field I can get a signal for a small 13.5mm - 0.5gram hammer silver coin at 23cm depth already at sensitivity 13-14 ... in Discrimination -a good signal -without ID ... Signal with ID get for sensitivity to sensitivity 17 and more ..- tested in Park2..recovery speed 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Setting the right Threshold is essential .. increases detection depth, setting to 3 to 7 is considered optimal ... _________________________________________________________ Equinox....... For very deep weak signals ... Relying on the right ID on Allmetal is not right ..- because Allmetal is a little deeper .. but weakly filters the signal for the right ID ..- you can often get the signal from -9ID, - 8ID .... To verify such a signal, use Discrimination set to 0 or better to +1, .. and you will be surprised ..

In this YT video is missing any emotion or enthusiasm for gold or treasure hunting, but maybe regularly digging 5kg gold nuggets per day is quite boring for them ..

We already know the coil prices for Minelab Vanquish.. The small V8 coil is approximately -104 euros.. The midle V10 coil is approximately -127 euros.. A large V12 coil for about -139 euros ..

Park 2 is somewhat sharper, a deeper program than Park1 ... and you can also lower your recovery speed to 3 .... and when looking for signal and slow coil movement to recovery speed 2- especially if you have a slightly mineralized and dry forest Terain.. On very wet terrain, you can still compare Park1 and Park2 on some deep signal - and see which program gives you a better response as well as a more accurate ID ... Both programs are sensitive enough to the low conductive 0.5 gram coins like Denar, Parvus .... also to medium conductive silver coins - for example Prazsky gros, as well as to high conductive silver coins .. But the Park2, Field2 .. programs still have the advantage of very small items. I use mostly Park2 or Park1 program .. I like shorter and sharper tones ..

I agree with the bulk of the size of the test material Especially heavily mineralized or salty, has a big impact on the tested detector and coil ... I find these differences on large = / 90kg / and small = / 10kg / Black sand box ..where large 90kg box mineralization significantly more affects the detection field of the coil .. In some detectors..... It is obvious that the DD coil may have similar problems if the CC coil in strong mineralization - for the best and deepest detection, you must also hold the DD coil at least 5 -7cm on mineralized terrain ../ in tests in a small box it is not visible...

Testing detectors, coils ... on various mineralized terrains - I give it some time ..it allows me to find different detection contexts better. Because I consider it a major drawback of the VLF detector .. IN "Low" mineralized terain 1-2 Bar Fe3O4 .. Item N.2 ..very small 3x5mm"O" gold segment- 0.05grams buried at 10cm=4" in the ground is a challenge for any detector .. Small 13mm Silver earring N.5 is 20cm=8" deep .. And small 13.5mm -0.45 grams of silver hammered coin Denar- is buried at 23cm=9" deep in the ground .. The deepest coin is"50eurocent"buried in a depth of 37 cm...=15" ..in ground.. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.The second test is a test IN" Medium and Highly"mineralized = 4 Bar Fe3O4 .. ceramic granulate "Liapor" which is stored in a 350 liter plastic box. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 .Test in "Extreme" mineralized 50L "7Bar Fe3O4" Black Sand box...= 4% Magnetite.. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The detector is tested on a variety of coils. This will determine the optimum coil for a given type of detection, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of a given coil / detector combination. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fisher Impulse AQ.... and reach in Tests.... I consider the system of tests in the squares and the storage of test objects to be a well thought out and difficult test In order for the detector to pass such a test ... the detector must be very sensitive (range-signal strength) to gold ... and also well separated in the iron../ I myself did a similar "nailbord test with a gold ring" under the nails ... which he put here here some time ago Rick .. so I know ... how it is difficult to unmask gold under the iron .. More information about the tests, but also the type of terrain .. on which Fisher Impulse AQ can work .... can be provided to ALEXANDRE..

The sensitivity and range of the VLF will depend on the frequency and also the real ..- Correct / not maximum / detector settings for the given degree of terrain mineralization .. So feel: low-mineralized terrain approximately 85-90% reach, / compared to airtest at the same settings / moderately mineralized terrain 75-80% reach, and about 55-60% reach in extreme mineralization Of course -from real-optimal Vlf detector setup for given terrain type. So the actual performance of Vlf in heavily mineralized terrain can eventually be only 35% compared to the maximum detector setup ...- which you cannot use here .. The detector frequency alone gives you a certain degree of sensitivity for the conductivity of the object. Higher frequencies are still several times more sensitive to low-conductive objects - for example, gold ..Multifrequency maintains a more balanced sensitivity to all types of object conductivity Therefore, I consider a PI detector with good iron discrimination as a much more powerful detection tool in difficult terrain conditions than a VLF detector. So the new PI detector ..... Fisher Impulse AQ, can say a lot in deep detection ..

I mean, for example, this moment..where's Vanquish reacting to the brick .... but also the video test Bricks and Coins. I wonder how Vanquish 340 works on Coin, Jewerly. Certain forms of discrimination at / 0, + 1, + 2 / in Equinox contribute to a better non-ferrous ID, as well as to a better tone of non-ferrous tone ... in mineralization .. My Vanquish 340 should be available in about 7-8 days .. so I'll do some comparison too ..

Flyfish... From the video and comments is clearly from the Vanquish 340 m and fixed Ground Balance ... Signal bricks is on -9..in the zone of small iron and minerals. In this case, it would be worthwhile to try to use the Coin program or Jewerly-programs that have some degree of discrimination against iron ... The test is also based on the reduction of sensitivity helps to better detect coin /1kopiejka SSSR/ under mineralized Brick .. I suppose Vanquish .. when the sensitivity decreases to change RX Gain .. and the detector can better target the slow movement of the coil.

Greetings Sergey -Asgo... ,, will be interesting to learn about AKA detectors specifically about Signum and the New "Intronik" multi-frequency detector ..

491/5000 Hammer coin I found on 5 ID ... near the coin was a piece of aluminum foil that gave 4 ID. After digging it had a hammer coin of 7-8 IDs. I use Park2 ../ in this program, conductive ground may reduce the salinity of IDs. Park1 program is resistant to saline and conductive ground. Try to compare Park 1 / for conductive, saline ground / and Park2 / for iron-polluted ground / Try to compare it with recovery speed 7 and discrimination set to +2 ...

aufarmer ..... Try a pack with Ni-Mh accumulators 2-3 times in a row charged / leveled / with a 24 hour charge interval .. Sometimes it helps .. The power of the pack is still dependent on 1 cell accumulator .. and each of them must work properly .. I think that....One the Ni-MH cells in the "packet" still has a low residual charge voltage .. when the "seem" - fully charged- while charging ... but its voltage in a few hours .. then quickly falls .. So you need it fully charge -to have the right voltage and power capacity .. I use Whites SpectraV3 and V3i ... replacement 3x 18650 Li-ion pack ... but for other brands of detectors ... I use 1.2- Volt AA NI-Mh... and also 9-Volt.. Ni-Mh accumulators ...

Personally, I see an increase in TX voltage of 54% as a very good step ... High TX voltage also means very well balanced coils .. especially for very small sizes, ..for medium coil sizes and large coils, these demands are less . .I believe Whites with the new 24K/GMX is on the right track ... Spectra V3.. My experience with TX bost ..... / Tx Normal= 10Volt - increase to approximately TX Bost ON= 25 Volts / according to my estimates, measurements Whites Spectra V3, I... prove at least 3 facts: Fact1...Small or medium coil .. strong sensitivity and range increase on the smallest objects - the detectors are in normal TX mode very weakly detectable or have a weaker detection range / or are practically invisible .. The range can be increased from 10-15-20% .. even to 90% - for very small - weakly detectable / invisible objects. In the test field I have buried at a depth of 10cm ..3x5mm -0.05 grams of gold "O" segment .. Spectra V3 detects it well in TXbost ON at 22.5khz .., Even on the 3F multi vTx Bost ON to detects- but more than the Borderline signal .. When Tx Bost OFF -un I get no detectable signal .. ..control airtest on the same detector setup confirms field tests: On the : 1. Frequency 22.5 Khz is range = 11-cm in normal Tx. and 12.5-12.8cm in Tx bost ON.=+15%more 2. On 3F multi-F .. is range = 8cm normal Tx. and 10.3cm -10.5cm in TxBostON.=+30%more Note: the detector which reaches the gold "O" segment at 12cm in the airtest - gives a "good signal" to the same Gold "O" segment buried at 10cm in a slightly mineralized ground..../Always count with at least 10-15% loss of depth in low mineralized ground-... compared to "airtest"! /. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fact 2 . Using TX bost ON - when "properly RX Gain"-not too high Rx Gain -is .. ... effectively eliminate EMI problems while still maintaining sufficient detection depth. Fact 3 . It is generally known that when using large Coils / size 18 "/ .. the sensitivity and the impact on very small objects and also small coins will decrease significantly. One way to achieve real good enough sensitivity and reach ..to 1.For these "Very small "objects to 100-150%.. /gold "O"segment-N.2 /-from 1.2cm Tx Bost OFF..to 3cm !!!..in Tx Bost ON.and... 2.And .." Small" object to 50%/gold earings N.3/-from 12cm -Tx Bost OFF... to 17.5cm !!! in Tx Bost ON ... 3.To Medium ,or Large object.. .the range is approximately. 10-15% to 20%max is to use TX bost ON .. Another important benefit of using Tx Bost ON in the Large Coils I've already mentioned ... ... is the better Elimination of EMI .. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Photo 1... Item N.2- .... Gold-0.05 Gram "O" segment - buried in the deep 10cm...in low mineralized Ground..Detectable Whites SpectraV3 in..TX Bost and using -6x10" mars Sniper Coil.. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Photo2 Item N6.. The 13.5mm-0.45gram Hammered Silver coin Denar in 23cm deph..in low mineralized ground ..detectable Whites Spectra V3-in Tx BostON -and 18" detech excelerator coil..

Garret may be surprised for this year .., Wide experience with detection technology... he has already managed a long time .. I would suggest to focus on the new powerful GTI class detector ..

Geotech1...

I found an interesting YT video Vanquish 340..This makes it easy to convert S -Shaft to direct -Shaft ...For example, if you ever want to do that ..I consider this a sophisticated Shaft design at the Vanquish ...

Personally, I think Vanquish will use an optimized Beach1-like program ... as a basis ... And that's why it works very well on the beach ... and without any special program just for the beach. But of course it is only an assumption .. If I have Vanquish 340 in my hands ..... I measure its TX on an oscilloscope ... and via FFT and take a picture of the frequency of the program ... Advantage and Point Vanquish 340 is in the fact that in "One Program" setting it handles different types of field conditions Detection..and has a good ID in depth .. -The main advantage of multifrequency .. And while it looks ... he's doing pretty well .. Equinox 800 Beach1 program- FFT -TX frequency Equinox 800 Park1 program TX frequency- FFT Equinox 800 Park2 program TX frequency - FFT

Vanquish 540 pro package is not a bad purchase if you decide to sell a small coil. ... so I think ... on WW1 and WW2 you will need especialy to use a large coil...

Do not search the Wanquish 340-" entry detector Level" all available and adjustable features ... that have Top Detectors available .. Fixed Iron Bias doesn't mean you can't detect in the iron ... but on the contrary eliminates a lot of iron waste --bottle caps,nails..... so you can detect "Good signals" Ferous and Nonferous -faster if it is sometimes at the cost of deteriorated separation ....but not ... in every case ... In the program ... "Allmetal" can search all kinds of objects .. Many good detectors on fixed Iron bias and allow effective detection... Iron bias - is not just a filter of iron ... it is a filter of very short signals - from objects, mineralization, Emi ..