Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I mentioned this last year and will re address the subject.  Has anyone compiled information of real signature so as one can listen ti clipping and signatures that a re funky in the different tone modes.  Although I have been a detectorist for years, many of the new detectors sounds tell more of a story than some are used to.  I am wondering if anyone has such a compilation.   It seems many love to post their finds on you tube but forget that the sound is just as important.  But they keep the headsets on which does not help the cause.. We are used in most cases to what some coins and jewelty sound like, but a clipped ring id different.  Perhaps some one might know of such a tool.    As always thanks for helping.

 

PROP

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO - This one really comes down to personal experience, recovering targets and reinforcing in your brain's muscle memory what the detector was telling you.  I can't imagine just learning this by seeing pics of finds next to some sound signature or audio file.  Clive Clynick does a good job of trying to provide some general sketches of tone forms for various target types in his Equinox guides, but it is basically generalized.  The variability in environmental factors makes approaches to learning tones of limited value.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guy's

       I see where your coming at Chase I would agree with that, and there are some good clips out there (Gigmaster and others). However due to the videos, the trash hits are left out. One of the things that I have discovered is totally deteriorated metal buried in the sand that throws me for a loop.  I have just ( in the last year) been trying to learn beach hunting.  Spent many years in the pasture or parks. That is why we rely on you seasoned vets. Just seems though I am missing something and waiting for the magic moment.

Prop 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember when the Sovereign was the hot ticket to have, there was an audio CD for sale one could purchase to familiarize yourself with the audio sounds of various trash and good targets.  All that is pretty well conveyed on various YouTube videos.  On most of my Equinox YouTube videos I share what the audio sounds like on targets as well as the TID. 

Problem is, and possibly why some don't take the time to do it is because it does take time.  If I'm hunting a remote site, my time's limited, but if I start making interesting finds, I'll generally start recording them, depending on my time crunch, I may or may not have the time to turn off my wireless headphones, rescan the target to show the TID and let viewers listen to the audio.  Then you have to repair your wireless headphones and continue detecting.   It doesn't sound like much, but if I'm at a good old site, with limited time, every time I do this, equates to less targets I'm going to dig at the end of the day and that next target may just be THE ONE haha

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I try and describe best I can.  I have done some videos.  Problem is wind can cause audio in video to be lacking.  And a go pro may not capture all of the nuance since external speaker is used on detector to capture audio.  

I call these findings I talk about (say Eqx) as tendencies.  No absolutes though.  It pays to be curious especially with EQX !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess , after reading  part or Clyde’s book and what Chase said make sense,@ I need to be more astute at looking at sizes, and if the location is more suitable for good targets as opposed to a locacation that is loaded with shell casings.  I did get Andy’s book yesterday and am tempted to dig into that.  I can only read so much of Clyde’s book before my head  spins and eyeballs come out.  The larger font in Andy’s book looks to be more amenable to adding eyeballs.  Anyhow still learning and I will recheck your vids Tnsharpshooter.

Prop

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/18/2019 at 9:15 AM, Chase Goldman said:

IMO - This one really comes down to personal experience, recovering targets and reinforcing in your brain's muscle memory what the detector was telling you.

So you're saying there's no shortcut?  I guess that's one of the things that makes metal detecting fun -- the challenges.  There are so many variables when detecting.  We (hope I can speak for others...) tend to view the world in as few dimensions as possible, and that means too few.  Dave Johnson makes a sobering point in this monograph:

http://www.fisherlab.com/hobby/davejohnson/SearchcoilfieldshapeApril2012.pdf

There he states:  to say what happens when you swing a target past the searchcoil of a simple motion discriminator requires computation of at least 26 variables.

I emphasized 'at least' because up to that point Dave has only assumed a single target.  Add just one nearby target (with its own 26 variables) and....  I think I get the picture, and it's not a simple one.

For a long time I didn't even understand what you guys are talking about.  I hear a tone, what else is there?  Eventually I wondered if those of us who never experienced the analog detector era missed out, since not only were the signals rich, but you had to rely a lot more on what you heard, not what you saw.

In every endeavor worth pursuing, there is a threshold to cross which takes a person from an intermediate performer to an expert.  In metal detecting, this may be the one.  I know I'm not there yet.

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is so true.  Being from the older Garrett and Explorer crowds you are on point with decent tones.  Ironically this gets you thinking about target shapes as well as trash shapes.  For myself another learning phase.  What did they say " It used to be easy"  I'm used to new beginnings.  I read and saved Daves article, it does open the eyes.  Quick question, have you acquired the 6" coil?  and how would that fair at beach?

 

Prop

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Propjob said:

...Have you acquired the 6" coil?  and how would that fair at beach?

I'm sure someone else can answer the 2nd part since I'm not a beach hunter.  I have both the 6" and 12"x15" coils but except for tiny nugget hunting with the 6" in the Nevada desert I haven't used either one much.  The larger coil's extra weight bothers my back.  I can see using that in a survey, for example when searching a large plot for an old, long ago raized dwelling.

I think the 6" coil has the usual advantages (less ground and less trash in the field of view, increased sensitivity to tiny targets). However the stock 11" is so good at allowing me to distinguish good targets among moderate trash that its extra coverage leads me to use it most of the time.  But thanks for reminding me -- I need to put some more time in on the two accessory coils.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Old Farm Hunter
      Hi i'm wondering if anyone has a metal detector headphone jack adapter that they could send me ? just send me a PM and ill give you my address thanks .
    • By GB_Amateur
      I've read some things here that confused me, and I checked them out today, finding the source of the confusion.  Sunray makes two sets of Pro Gold headphones:  the 'Originals' and the 'CTX version'.  I have the former.  I've read that you need the CTX version if you want to use them with the Equinox.  (As always, maybe I didn't read the fine print.)
      When I plug my 'Originals' (via a 1/4" female to 3.5 mm male adapter) into the back side of the control module it's as if they aren't connected at all.  Nothing comes through the headphones and the Equinox speaker emits its normal sounds.  Presumably this is what has been reported here.
      However, using the WM-08 wireless module (connected to the headphones with the same adapter) the speaker is bypassed and the sound in the headphones is loud and clear.  In fact it is noticeably louder than with the Garrett MS-2 headphones.  Although I didn't check my White's ProStars, in the past they performed similarly to the MS-2's.  The sound quality doesn't seem quite as clean but the Pro Golds certainly have enough sound quality to work well in the field.  I wonder if the volume difference has to do with impedence matching.
      Anyway, bottom line is don't throw out your Original Pro Golds if you have converted to an Equinox user.
    • By 67GTA
      I was about to pull the trigger on these https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07VD3M6M3/ref=ask_ql_qh_dp_hza when I read that they are supposed to pair to a device separately. I might be misunderstanding, but it sounded like you would have two earbuds paired separately and work together, or is it one earbud paired to the device and the other earbud connected to the first earbud? I wasn't sure if the Equinox would simultaneously connect to two devices this way. Anyone have any experience with this type of earbud?
    • By garikfox
      I'm looking at the B&Z audio enhancer for the GPX, the one like JP uses.
      Is anyone using a B&Z and what do you think about it?

    • By Old Farm Hunter
      anyone know if these are good detecting headphones https://www.fleetfarm.com/detail/bounty-hunter-stereo-headphones/0000000203051?Ntt=metal+detecting+headphones&_requestid=2321948 or  do you know of a cheap pair that are good thanks
    • By kac
      My old headphones got all beat up over the summer plowing through the woods so I snagged a pair of Garrett Stow Aways for my Tejon. I was really surprised how good the audio really is on them. They do fit a little tight and are smaller but have a really great range of sound. Now I need to re-learn my sounds.
      Anyways I didn't spend much time out, maybe half hour or so and left the 10x12 coil which kills me in trashy areas but I did get a nice smooth hit on this little 18k rose gold ear ring with a few diamond chips 0.7g.  Was only inch or so deep nothing to brag about.

×
×
  • Create New...