Jump to content
Website Rollback - Latest Updates ×

Is Garrett About To Release A New Gold Prospecting Pi?


phrunt

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, phrunt said:

They owned the VLF's since the Equinox came out, they've lost that crown now with two other brands competing and or beating them with that, one can only hope in the best interests of customers that the same can take place with PI's as we can get some true competition.  I'm not brand loyal I'll buy whichever works best for me.  At the moment yes, they're better than everyone else, but will that remain forever?  

Once again, YOUR thread is about a new Garrett prospecting detector. Anyone developing a PI has a LOT of catching up to do to increase their market share.  

  • Like 2
  • Oh my! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


All I can say is after the Apex subpar performance I hope Garrett really has something to talk about with this new detector. I can tell you right now I'm not going to even think about buying one until the initial reviews are out. All the latest ergonomics, looks and features can't replace subpar performance these days. The competition is too stiff to release a lack luster performer. 

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jonathan Porter said:

Once again, YOUR thread is about a new Garrett prospecting detector. Anyone developing a PI has a LOT of catching up to do to increase their market share.  

Yes, but the other brands showed it was possible with the VLF's when I at least didn't think it would be.    

I agree there is a lot of catching up to do, but it's worth having hope that some company will be able to do it, will it be Garrett? I hope so.   Either way if a slightly improved ATX in a standard lightweight design came out I would be interested, El Nino showed just how sensitive the ATX can be to small gold and it seems to run nice.   They don't have to win to be a winner in my mind, they just have to do whats needed to give the market another option and to start to bring some competition to market.  I'm not expecting a GPX or GPZ killer, but I would be very happy if they did.

Any thread about a new prospecting PI is going to instantly draw comparisons to the current market leaders, that's why it's here, and not in the Garrett section of the forum.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me, to be competitive a new gold detector has to beat the Z/X coil combo and the 6K in performance firstly, and of course be lightweight. I`m fickle and don`t care what Manufacturer or tech. VLF, PI, ZVT or something new, but a wee birdie tells me ML will be that manufacturer and the tech is ZVT. Prove that little birdie wrong Garrett.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I agree especially when ZVT is involved I also like to be optimistic and I hope Garrett can be successful.  I want them to make a detector I want to buy.  If not the goal of making a prospecting detector that's light in weight, good but not the best in performance and at a good price they'll sell a lot of them, especially people that don't need to spend a massive amount of money on a detector, the person that will use it a week or two a year if that, a huge hole is in that space of the market, and its there for the taking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A GM1000 isn't really a prospecting detector. A prospecting detector needs to be lightweight, simple, quick, and able to adapt to many different ground types. VLF's fall completely flat in salty or saturable soils. The 6000 is the only good lightweight prospecting detector for sale right now aside from a 5000.

If someone could make one even lighter, it'd be in a class of it's own.

Which makes me wonder something else - how responsive is Garrett to fixing issues discovered after release on their other machines? I don't follow the jewelry/coin detecting forums enough to have a sense for that.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was out of cell range a few days, just back to this pleasant surprise. I’ve wished Fisher good luck on developing the Impulse Gold, and I certainly welcome anything Garrett and Nokta have to offer. I think it’s bollocks that any new detector MUST have better performance than the GPZ or 6000. Last I looked Minelab still sells the GPX 5000 and SDC 2300. There is room still for good value propositions for people who simply can’t tell the spouse they want to sell the car so they can pay for a metal detector. If it was to take top honors, so much the better. But setting it up as beat GPZ or lose, is setting terms designed to favor Minelab.

I do agree power users will only use the most powerful detector available. But lots of us use different calculations based on different criteria. I use a GPX 6000 instead of a GPZ 7000, although I think the GPZ 7000 is the more powerful detector. Why? The 6000 is better for me and my circumstances. We all have a personal calculus that does not automatically boil down to “only own the most powerful, no matter the cost.”

One of the biggest gripes I’ve had the last 20 years is the ATX being a perfectly respectable circuit in a housing totally inappropriate to desert prospecting. I went so far as to cram my own ATX in a custom box just to try and make the point, to get some action. All I got was more frustration. Long story short, if it’s better than ATX, and packaged and priced right, there is room for Garrett to get back in the game. Fingers crossed. I’d love to have a U.S. company to root for again.

https://www.detectorprospector.com/forums/topic/462-garrett-atx-strip-down-rebuild/

 

 

Garrett Axiom Quick Facts, Owner's Manual, Etc.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had secret hopes that your silence meant you were busy field testing this machine already Steve. :laugh:

In all seriousness though, I wonder if Garrett has an experienced team of prospecting detectorists to field test equipment? That could make all the difference between a machine that succeeds and fails when it comes to actual prospecting use.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MineLab is doing their best to up the completion response, by keeping their prices as high as they do. If the small upstart Aus detector company that took on the USA leaders in the early 1990s. Anything is possible. Maybe the USA completion or the technical advance Europe and Asian including China could be drawn in to make a more suitable gold detector for the general public.

Keep the prices high MineLab and let the other get a bite of the Golden Pie.  ? 

I would like to see an electronic box that I can add my stick, coil and audio that are available from other sources.

                              ???                                     ?

  • Haha 1
  • Oh my! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...