Jump to content

Recommended Posts

In the last few weeks, I've had a chance to try out Minelab's new SDC 2300 in the hills of California. I've had excellent luck with it so far - 8 nuggets the first day out, 6 nuggets the second. I did up a blog post with more detail for Minelab's Treasure Talk blog. See: http://www.minelab.c...-s-new-sdc-2300

Minelab has a long history of introducing new, cutting edge PI technology, and the SDC 2300 definitely continues that tradition. Its very sensitive to small targets, waterproof to 10 ft., amazingly resistant to coil falsing on grass and rocks, rugged, compact and easy to use. Between the small gold sensitivity and the waterproof feature, this detector will be accomplishing things no pulse detector could do before. I plan to be using quite a bit the rest of this year. No question that a number of GPX owners will be wanting an SDC, and I am sure many of you will be interested in taking a closer look at this new detector, and I'd be happy to answer any questions.

post-5-0-03051100-1403540925_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Chris… congratulations on those really beautiful nuggets, and thanks for an excellent report about your observations using this unit. I understand that these nuggets were recovered in a nasty hotrock area. Could you also describe generally at what sort of depth range they were detected, and do you feel a GPX equipped with a Sadie coil would have detected them?

 

A week or so ago Gary Schafer from Minelab was on American Digger's Relic Roundup call-in show discussing the new SDC 2300 at this link http://en.1000mikes.com/app/archiveEntry.xhtml?archiveEntryId=323405

 

He commented that the SDC 2300 was capable of up to 60% GPX 5000 depth capability. He didn’t quantify that observation with specifics as to nugget size, ground mineralizations, or GPX timings, etc. Are you able to offer any clarification to his statement based on your experience with this unit?

 

He also mentioned that during testing in Australia, the SDC 2300 detected both a .02 gram (0.3 grain) and .a 05 gram (0.77 grain) gold nugget at four to five inches depth. It is difficult to imagine any detector locating a tiny 0.3 grain nugget at a depth approaching five inches. 

 

Jim.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Jim -

You know that man made objects like coins are pretty uniform, but nuggets are all over the map and not uniform at all. Not all 0,1 gram nuggets are created equal. Detection depths are a complex mix of size, orientation, porosity, surrounding rocks, etc.  I've seen pennyweight "nuggets" that a GPX 5000 would have a tough time with in air at 1 inch, and other pennyweight pieces that would overload a 5000 across a one inch air gap - it depends on the nature of the nugget. So I am uncomfortable with any simple statements that such and such a detector will detect nuggets of a certain size at a certain depth. Reality is way more complex than that.

 

At any specific area, I feel pretty confident that on nuggets less than a gram, the SDC going to out perform the GPX 5000 and anything else except a high frequency VLF in low mineral ground (and even then its pretty close). On larger, deeper stuff the 5000 will outperform.

 

The place I got my nuggets is one where the gold is porous and sharp edged. If you look real close a my gold, you will see a couple are actually small specimens - more quartz than gold by volume. This is the type of stuff PI detectors generally have trouble with - and I knew this. Over they years, I've gotten a lot of larger pieces there, but with my GP Extreme, I got very few less than a pennyweight. I remember digging a 0.4 ouncer that was only 6 inches deep. It was a weak signal and I was shocked to pull out such a large nugget at so shallow a depth with such a poor signal, but that's what this place is like. Then with the GPX 5000 and its greater sensitivity, I got a bunch of nuggets in the half gram to pennyweight sized range. Now I am collecting stuff of a gram down to about 0.1 grams at this place with the SDC.

 

For large stuff deep, I will be using my 5000. For small stuff shallow I will use the SDC. In some places with super mild soils where nearly all the gold is tiny, like less than a grain, I will use a high frequency VLF. The SDC will displace a lot of applications  I formerly used a high frequency VLF for, but not for all.

 

Having seen a bunch of the silver specimens you post, I think the SDC would out perform a 5000 on most of them because of the finely crystalline nature of the silver.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice blog entry Chris and even nicer nuggets! Welcome to the forum Jim.

I will toss in my two cents. The GPX 5000 with the Commander 8" mono or Nugget Finder Sadie is VERY good on small gold. I do not think everyone with a GPX 5000 need run out and get the SDC 2300. I do not see the SDC as equaling the GPX until maybe the 1/2 gram range and under with an edge on certain small stuff the GPX will miss. I frankly dismiss the less than grain at 4-5 inch depth statement.

I honestly think the GPX 5000 is a vastly superior overall prospecting detector than the SDC 2300. While some GPX owners may very well want one, I see the SDC 2300 as appealing to a separate group. Those who want a good PI but who may not want to spend $5795 on one and also those who are put off by the complexity of the GPX 5000. The new SDC owner can be up and running in minutes and is set up to find the type of gold that is by now the most common type left to be found - tiny bits and pieces. Yet it can and will find chunkier stuff.

In my case personally whether a GPX 5000 or SDC 2300 finds smaller gold totally misses the appeal of the SDC. I like the SDC because it is self-contained, lightweight (compared to the GPX system), compact, easy to use, and waterproof. Right now I am using my GPX in open ground and SDC in thick brushy areas. The GPX and large coils cover open ground FAR better - you feel like you are spitting in the wind with the SDC. Conversely in the brush the GPX system is a bit of a nightmare unless heavily modified.

All I can say is every day I am not considering which one finds small gold better, I am considering which detector I want to use to handle the specific very real environmental conditions. I am quite confident I can find gold with either so other factors come into play. One important one being the SDC 2300 is more fun to run. The GPX 5000 is my workhorse - or maybe I am its workhorse!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Thanks to both of you for providing a reasonable perspective on the SDC 2300’s capabilities.

 

Jim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Condor
      We caught a break in the 90+ temps in Yuma for one last trip.  Ostensibly, it was to be a quick trip to the spot we found the bigger gold in Feb and to test the X-Coil 15" Concentric coil over the ground we had covered extensively with the X-Coil 17x12 and stock coil.  It's about a 1/2 mile walk to the spot but I pulled up short to detect a wash we were about to cross.  My friend with the Concentric coil went on to the target area.  I am using the 7000 with stock coil while waiting for some re-work on my patch lead for the X-Coils.  
      I had worked the lower sections of this particular wash back in Feb and found 6 little bits in one small area, the rest of the wash seemed barren.  My goal was work the wash towards our target area just to get the machine warmed up and my listening skills tuned in.  I was working pretty quick really looking for a sitting duck rather than slow and methodical because this wash hadn't produced too well.  About 100 yds on, I hit a pretty good tone right up against the wash sidewall.  I pulled out the bigger of non-specie gold in the picture.  From there over about 20 yds I pulled 3 more small pieces then hit the smaller specie gold on an inside bend of the wash.  I continued up the wash and found the bigger specie dead center of the wash down in the bedrock.  I found 1 more tiny bit up on the bank, but then starting hitting a lot of trash targets so I turned around and reworked the wash for 0 nuggets.  Because of the specie pieces I then started a circle on the hillsides all around the area for nothing.  
      I put down my gear and walked to the target area to check on my friend with the Concentric coil.  He had found 2 pieces in an area well detected on our previous trips and attributed it to the overall sensitivity of the Concentric on small targets.  Because of the heat and short trip we had no opportunity to make any comparisons on undug targets.  
      I worked my way back down the wash to the RZR, over areas I had covered in Feb.  On the last bend I was picking my way down a slick rock slide area and waved my coil over some overburen covering a layer of bedrock above me.  I got a faint tone and started pulling down the overburden and reached some decomposing granite bedrock.  The target sound got better so I ended up busting out the bedrock trying to pick up the target down in a deep crack.  As I got further down, the target got weaker and I thought I was pushing it deeper in the crack, so I busted out some more bedrock.  I finally picked up a half a matchhead size nugget and thought that just couldn't be right.  As good as the 7000 is on small gold, that just didn't seem right.  I then waved over my spoils pile with all this overburden and busted up granite.  Targets everywhere.  The sun beating down on me and I'm on my knees sorting through the spoils trying to pinpoint tiny targets with a 14" coil.  After about 1/2 hr, I got most of them, 6 matchhead size nuggets.   If I had my handy NOX, I could have made short work of this mess, but maybe I'll go back for the crumbs next year.  
      I'm moving to Reno in a couple weeks, I'll be a snowbird in Yuma next year.  
       




    • By AU_Solitude
      I hear that an individual in Northern California recently stumbled upon a nugget weighing over 16oz troy - anyone have any photos or the story of this find yet? This is the largest CA find I am aware of since the Butte nugget.
    • By tboykin
      I found this on a quick adventure in between jobs. It’s the prettiest nugget in my collection. Weighs under a gram but man it was fun!
      I found that running the EQ800 in single frequency really helped stability in this red hot ground.
      Here it is fresh out of the ground.


      On the 6 inch coil which helped me get between boulders to find it.


      After some toothbrush action  almost looks like one of the 50 fired bullets I found today. But I’ll call it a flowing hair nugget instead. Maybe the coin shooters will let me hunt with them.

       
      Weigh in on the cheapo scale.

       
      Wasn’t wearing gloves because I’m no Nancy boy. But maybe I should have been.

       
      I think there was a parable about the guy above and his friend.


      It’s ok I needed the exercise anyways. But next time I’ll bring my big saw just in case.

      Hand stacked rocks are sometimes a good sign.

       
      The poison oak was in bloom, the air was sub freezing, and the square nails and bullets were practically jumping out of the ground. But hey I got a cool piece of gold, paid for my gas and got some threshold meditation in so it’s a win win for me.
    • By LuckyLundy
      The weather may have turned for the better in Northern Nevada.  It was time to get out and check how my GPZ 7000, would handle the moisture/salt from the Winter Storms.  I pulled into the Burn Barrel to camp, but it was like pulling into a KOA.  I unloaded my trusty RZR and hit the trail to find a nugget.  I ran into several folks out trying their luck, all had smiles on their faces and enjoying our outdoor hobby.  I was told that Gerry was having his training at the Burn Barrel which explained the crowd of RV’s.  I did get time for a short visit with Gerry and Lunk, before heading out.  The soil, is a little noisy with High Yield/Normal.  Using Difficult settled it down perfectly, but not my preferred setting for dink nuggets.  Anyways, I hunted in Normal and ground balanced often to give my ears a rest from the noisy ground.  I didn’t find any dink nuggets which are the Bread & Butter to any poke, but did find a couple of Steak & Lobster nuggets before loading up and heading home from the short Dirt Recon Trip.  There’s gold out there, you just need to get your coil over it, I need some Bread & Butter Nuggets to complete my meal.  Talking about meals, my Dog Marley refused to eat his normal dog grub on this trip, and only wanted what I brought “Fried Chicken”.  Until the next Hunt!
      LuckyLundy
       


    • By oneguy
      FINALLY got out on first hunt of the season!  Snow capped mountains, plenty of sun, and the temps were cool enough the bugs weren't out yet.  The take isn't much (.980g) but FUN, FUN, FUN!!!!!!

    • By Glenn in CO
      Here are the results on the four gold specimens from the post "Cleaning Gold Specimens - Step By Step Methods".
      Specimen A:

      \
       
      Specimen B:

      Close up photos of Specimen B front and back:

       
      Specimens C:


       
      Specimen: D


       
       
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...