Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi guys !

Yes, I am a beach hunter, but I was invited to metall detecing on a WW1 field...

 

So the beach hunter I am was suddenly contemplating a huge corn field which has seen some ww1 Action...

I chose to hunt before noon (2 hours) with the Equinox 800, and two hours in the afternoon with the Safari I happened to win at a detection rally two weeks ago.

As you can tell from the posted pics, the Nox Found 18 targets, the Safari 32, but i felt the afternoon search was richer in targets...The best find of the day was a silver King Leopold II 1867 2 Francs (Belgium), a very rare coin, as it has only been minted from 1866-1868

The nox got more tiny targets (low conductors), but the Safari was able to find some tiny targets too.

I don't know what to think about the results about both detectors, but they are very close in my opinion.

Those are the pics of this outing (round bullets are belgian, the others are german).

 

Happy hunting !

PA110564.JPG

PA110565.JPG

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tough to say, you can't really garner much statistically from one hunt like that, but having swung Equinox, Safari and the Etrac, I would go with the Equinox.

They can be very similar, but the Equinox is way more versatile and can be setup like a Safari. The Safari is no slouch, though it has a one track mind and cannot be setup like the Equinox.

Great backup machine though and the price was right.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hay alluminati, I don't come often on the forum ...

 

Of course tou can't get conclusions out of this outing ! I completely agree...But I might think the Safari was (is ?) tuned ti higher conductives, while the Nox is more "europe friendly"... The Field mose is "europe-oriented", while the park mode is "US-orientend"...Maybe that's the key, explaining "polyvalence"...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree the Equinox would be more Europe friendly.

Yes, the Safari did seem like it was tuned for high conductors and was actually pretty good on small fine coins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Tnsharpshooter
      http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,152652
       
      NASA-Tom Wrote:
      -------------------------------------------------------
      > Here it comes...…… a bit of a paradigm-shift in te
      > chnology/technological-advancements. I want to giv
      > e you guys a (moderate) heads-up...… for something
      > that is on the horizon. It is built by a small com
      > pany (medium/small) that makes military-grade unde
      > rwater locating devices. One of those engineers is
      > a avid detectorist. He has convinced/steered the c
      > ompany into inventing/building a hobby-line detect
      > or. It's been in-the-works for about 18 years. All
      > of the prototyping had been completed 2 years ago.
      > It has been an "unreleased" completed product for
      > the past 2 years. (((We are at: "shoot the enginee
      > r" time-continuum))). It is not quite a VLF..... a
      > nd it's not quite a PI. Ergonomically..... it has
      > been 'pushed' to be in the shape of a detector...t
      > hat we would 'recognize' as a detector. It's been
      > some work..... to get the unit to 'sound' like a m
      > etal detector. . . . . . that we would 'understand
      > ' it's language/audio. It is "quirky". You will li
      > ke some of the quirks.....and can put some of them
      > to good use. Some things that I can share...… at t
      > his time:

      > * Very specifically targets TWO INTENTS:
      > 1. Wet-Salt
      > 2. Bad Mineralization
      > This is to say...….. it does NOT target mega-trash
      > y areas...… does NOT target carpets of nails.

      > * NOT for beginners/novice. Targeted for seasoned
      > detectorists.

      > * IP-68

      > * 11" x 8" DD open coil (hydrodynamic)

      > * Electronics designed TO/FOR the coil. ((( If you
      > want to change coils..... you must change the elec
      > tronics. This is a very specific/discrete platform
      > . )))

      > * Weight/Ergonomics: Very similar to F75/EQX/T2

      > * One rechargeable battery. 1-1/3 length of a C-Ce
      > ll. Diameter of a C-Cell. 6000mAh 3.7V. This is a
      > 'off the shelf'......easy to access/buy......and Y
      > OU can change it... in about 40-seconds. (Under th
      > e armcup).

      > * Full VDI ID ….. with a 60-point span.

      > * A very real/correct All-Metal Mode. Disc Mode. I
      > D Mode.

      > * Iron span range is: -30 to 0.   And for a very s
      > pecific/discrete electronic platform rationale/jus
      > tification. You DON'T want this changed.

      > * Non-Ferrous span range is: 0-30.

      > * In certain modes..... very responsive to high co
      > nductors.

      > * Inches deeper than Excal/CZ/Sov for coins and go
      > ld rings..... in a wet-salt environment. ((( Almos
      > t exactly parallels the performance of my 'tuned/t
      > weaked' AquaStar-II..... in the wet-salt. . . . .
      > but. . . . . with FULL ID capabilities. ))) Resona
      > nt (great) for tiny gold rings, small, medium and
      > large gold rings. This is where the depth advancem
      > ents have taken place.

      > * One of the paradigm-shifts: Ground Balance the u
      > nit in the dry sand FIRST. ((( And in a different
      > fashion: Hold coil about 10" above the ground. Pre
      > ss and hold GB button. Lower the coil to about 1"
      > off of ground. Release GB button. DONE. )))  Then.
      > ..…… walk down to the wet-salt. . . and manually z
      > eroize your local wet-salt content/volume. Now the
      > detector … no longer even sees the wet-salt. It is
      > not 'canceled'. It is not phase-shifted out. It is
      > not Ground Balanced out. The high conductivity of
      > the wet-salt is no longer seen. This is a fairly l
      > arge dramatic departure from all other detectors.
      > First time in history. A paradigm-shift.

      > * This unit targets beach hunters.... and relic hu
      > nters in bad dirt. This unit loses depth/performan
      > ce in bad dirt …but at a SLOWER rate than other un
      > its. It 'holds on' to good target ID's at deeper d
      > epths.... in bad dirt..... at a better depth/ID ra
      > te than other units.

      > * Trying to keep the cost below the CTX-3030 MSRP.
      > If we don't market/advertise it..... the cost may
      > be around $1600..... or slightly lower. The intent
      > may be to sell the unit on this web-site (forum) o
      > nly/exclusively. That way..... we can circumvent a
      > dvertisement costs (which can be very expensive).

      > * For the most-part: K.I.S.S. theory has been empl
      > oyed.

      > * Heavy gauge carbon fiber.

      > More details to follow...… possibly.
       
    • By calabash digger
      The Nox was impressive on my local beach with the 15 inch coil. No great finds in this short 3 min video.
       
    • By Vez
      I have gotten out a total of 6 times this year, this hunt made 7.  A new friend of mine and long time 3030 hunter challenged me to go to a football field that he has hunted for years with the 3030 and the 17".  He said he would be shocked if I pulled a silver as they are all 8" or deeper and the ground is difficult.  I too swung the 3030 for years, but feel the technology in the 800 is superior and would alert me to any keepers that were under the coil.   I went in the rain/snow and played in the mud for 3 hours looking for keepers in his football field.  Results and settings below.
      Park 2, Fe Bias 3, Recov. 5, Sens. 16-18 depending on Fe noise density, Ground Balance pumped out to 16, Volume 20 (want to know more or if I left something out just ask)
      WARNING:   There is some cussing in the videos, I was excited as I went in there having zero expectations. 
      https://photos.app.goo.gl/syyarSRTC4XgPXjN9
       
    • By Tnsharpshooter
      Saw this posted on another forum.
      http://www.dankowskidetectors.com/discussions/read.php?2,155115
    • By Tom Slick
      Decided to mod the 800 rod by switching out the straight middle rod to the White's S rod. I know a lot of folks like a straight rod but by switching it out, it eliminates the detector's handgrip from wanting to twist at the end of each swing. In a side by side comparison, both myself and a buddy with an 800 both like the feel of the modified version. The mod requires the middle rod from a White's DFX, or MXT. The rod needs to be drilled on the upper top end for the spring plunger and again adjustment holes need to be drilled on the bottom for length adjustment. The Lower rod from a Makro Racer or Kruzer is used as the lower rod from the Nox is larger in diameter. The top of the S rod also needs to be shimmed about .040" in diameter to fit snug into the Nox upper rod. Now it swings about as close to an F75 as you can get.

×