Popular Post Chet Posted January 4, 2024 Popular Post Share Posted January 4, 2024 GPX 6000 test coils I know of some areas that have produced some large nuggets. So in pursuit of large gold I have experimented with winding some test coils and did some air testing. Results are with my poor hearing and varying EMI conditions. But the measurements work for my comparison testing. On bad EMI days the larger coils are very noisy. A 20 inch 12 AWG Litz coil might be the next one to test. Meanwhile I am experimenting with some large GPZ 7000 coils. Have a good day, Chet Coil Description 1oz gold coin Air test inches 30" x 30" = 34"RND 1.86mm flat spiral Litz wire 27 24" x 24"= 27"RND 1.86mm flat spiral Litz wire 27 23" RND 2.3 mm 14T 3 vertical rows Litz wire 26 17.5" RND 2mm Litz, spiral flat wound ID 14" 22 17" RND Vertical Wound 2mm Litz wire 21 17" x 13" Minelab GPX 6000 coil flat spiral layers close wound 12 AWG Litz wire 18 11" Minelab GPX 6000 flat spiral layers close wound 12 AWG Litz wire 17 14" Minelab GPX 6000 DD Coil 14 6" GPX 6000 DIY flat spiral close wound 56 turns 2 layers 1.86mm Litz wire 11 12 2 Link to comment https://www.detectorprospector.com/topic/23961-nugget-finder-gpx-6000-coils-delays/page/2/#findComment-263217 Share on other sites More sharing options...
geof_junk Posted January 4, 2024 Share Posted January 4, 2024 Good table, most of my 1 oz nuggets are about the size of an Aus/Eng. silver 1 shilling or an USA quarter and shows there is not much gain in going over 18" round coil for that size. 3 Link to comment https://www.detectorprospector.com/topic/23961-nugget-finder-gpx-6000-coils-delays/page/2/#findComment-263218 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aureous Posted January 4, 2024 Share Posted January 4, 2024 33 minutes ago, Chet said: I know of some areas that have produced some large nuggets. So in pursuit of large gold I have experimented with winding some test coils and did some air testing So you plucked the 'handshake' chip out the stock coils and made up an adapter for these tests? Fascinating results... The 6000 is not regarded as a deep-seeking detector, with both the 5000 and 7000 obtaining better results in all tests that Ive seen. But, these tests seem pretty good. All obviously mono's with but with proper shielding???? 4 Link to comment https://www.detectorprospector.com/topic/23961-nugget-finder-gpx-6000-coils-delays/page/2/#findComment-263219 Share on other sites More sharing options...
phrunt Posted January 4, 2024 Author Share Posted January 4, 2024 Just look how close your pick can go to the 6000 when you have to work hard to keep it away from the 7000 ? 3 1 Link to comment https://www.detectorprospector.com/topic/23961-nugget-finder-gpx-6000-coils-delays/page/2/#findComment-263220 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chet Posted January 4, 2024 Share Posted January 4, 2024 20 minutes ago, Aureous said: So you plucked the 'handshake' chip out the stock coils and made up an adapter for these tests? Fascinating results... The 6000 is not regarded as a deep-seeking detector, with both the 5000 and 7000 obtaining better results in all tests that Ive seen. But, these tests seem pretty good. All obviously mono's with but with proper shielding???? I purchased a used GPX 6000 Mono coil and removed the cord and chip module together to accomplish the tests. I use a two conductor male and female connector to attach the test coils. I have tested some of these coils on my GPX 5000 which is unmodified. The GPX 6000 results are a few inches better than the GPX 5000. I shielded two of the coils with graphite conductive paint (100-150 ohms per inch). The before and after measurements where the same. The GPZ 7000 coils are more difficult to make and balance but is a better choice so that is that is the way I am preceding. 5 Link to comment https://www.detectorprospector.com/topic/23961-nugget-finder-gpx-6000-coils-delays/page/2/#findComment-263221 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aureous Posted January 4, 2024 Share Posted January 4, 2024 45 minutes ago, Chet said: I purchased a used GPX 6000 Mono coil and removed the cord and chip module together to accomplish the tests. I use a two conductor male and female connector to attach the test coils. I have tested some of these coils on my GPX 5000 which is unmodified. The GPX 6000 results are a few inches better than the GPX 5000. I shielded two of the coils with graphite conductive paint (100-150 ohms per inch). The before and after measurements where the same. The GPZ 7000 coils are more difficult to make and balance but is a better choice so that is that is the way I am preceding. Cool, thats the smart way to do it, keep the coax attached to the chip and remove the whole lot. Shielding is spot on. Are these results all air tests??? Were you able to ground balance any of the larger coils or were they all board-builds only....without shells??? 1 Link to comment https://www.detectorprospector.com/topic/23961-nugget-finder-gpx-6000-coils-delays/page/2/#findComment-263222 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chet Posted January 4, 2024 Popular Post Share Posted January 4, 2024 9 hours ago, Aureous said: Cool, thats the smart way to do it, keep the coax attached to the chip and remove the whole lot. Shielding is spot on. Are these results all air tests??? Were you able to ground balance any of the larger coils or were they all board-builds only....without shells??? Two GPX 6000 coils; a 6" RND and a 26" x 22" were completed and tested in the field. They both ground balanced and worked fine. The 6" picks up smaller bits than the stock 11". The 26" x 22" was wound with 12 AWG stranded copper coated aluminum wire to reduce cost and weight. That was a big mistake that cost some inches off of depth. Litz wire is expensive so when possible it is reused to experiment with on the next brainstorm.? The attached photo is the 6" coil with the coax and module. The chip and ferrite housing is inside a blob of epoxy which now is covered with heat shrink tubing. The coil shield is connected by a separate spade connector 13 1 Link to comment https://www.detectorprospector.com/topic/23961-nugget-finder-gpx-6000-coils-delays/page/2/#findComment-263248 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aureous Posted January 4, 2024 Share Posted January 4, 2024 4 hours ago, Chet said: The chip and ferrite housing is inside a blob of epoxy which now is covered with heat shrink tubing. The coil shield is connected by a separate spade connector Ha, you're full of great ideas Chet! Re-use the cable and chip for multiple coils....brilliant! Giving me ideas now... ? 1 Link to comment https://www.detectorprospector.com/topic/23961-nugget-finder-gpx-6000-coils-delays/page/2/#findComment-263276 Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasong Posted January 5, 2024 Share Posted January 5, 2024 Good stuff Chet. This kind of DIY experimenting is part of almost every enthusiast community from cars to computers, it really makes it fun and interesting to follow or participate in modding equipment for many of us. Goes to show Minelab isn't going to stop it with silly chips, and they should embrace it instead. Everyone wins that way! Good on you for keeping the experimenting, modding, and innovating spirit alive in the gold machine world. ? 9 Link to comment https://www.detectorprospector.com/topic/23961-nugget-finder-gpx-6000-coils-delays/page/2/#findComment-263312 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now