Jump to content

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Jeff McClendon said:

It deserves a new coil and the Nel Super Fly might just be the ticket.

As always I look forward to your review (if you get one of these new coils).  And you're the first person here that I can remember in a long time (since Steve's review) saying something good about the AT/Gold.  👍

garrett-at-gold-nugget-detector.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

On 10/31/2020 at 7:48 PM, GB_Amateur said:

As always I look forward to your review (if you get one of these new coils).  And you're the first person here that I can remember in a long time (since Steve's review) saying something good about the AT/Gold.  👍

There are three things I do not like about the AT Gold which are the Iron Audio, it is not optimized for high mineralization despite what Garrett says and I have never liked the weight or where the coil connects on the 8.5 X 11" DD coil.

The iron audio even through the headphones can be heard for miles and really can't be used continuously by me anyway. I don't think Garrett intended for it to be operated like that in the first place. It is just for investigating a target. Garrett's iron discrimination works very well at breaking up on smaller iron objects anyway and I like how you can use a little iron discrimination even in All Metal.

I never could get it to ground balance in some places or get it to quiet down a bit on some pesky hot rocks in All Metal. The Ground Balance Window thing is iffy at best. I ended up just prospecting in Disc 1 often.

The 8.5X11" is really a boat anchor. The 5X8" is awesome. The Nel Super Fly  with coil cover seems to be 71 grams (2.6 oz) lighter than the 8.5X11" with coil cover and mounts in the middle of the coil. Could be great.

I like everything else about the AT Gold, especially the very short audio tone length (compared to the AT Pro which takes forever to stop sounding even in Proportional mode), and I like how the audio uses exactly the same medium tone in All Metal too. It has good recovery speed with iron audio off and is also not too shabby at unmasking if the iron audio is off and some iron discrimination is used. The Gold has a good threshold, is easy to operate and is almost as good as that new low cost Nok Mak detector as far as target ID accuracy. The Gold is well built and I have always trusted it under water and have had no problems so far. It is a very underrated and often maligned (by me too) detector.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

 Me and my friend did really well at one freshwater finger lake here in    N.Y. with the AT GOLD and it's  stock coil. It discriminated the bottle caps very well  that infested  this lake and hit   the gold with gusto. We found many silver coins  at the ghost pier that had many  nails.  This machine was paid back very fast and I have my  record of 6 gold in a day  with it even though I got 5 with the  Nox in a 2.5 hour hunt where  the 6 gold needed a 8  hour hunt. The iron audio would   get  to you in thick iron after a while.  It would be nice to  lower the volume on it.  A very fun machine to use at the beach and in tot lots.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Jeff McClendon said:

It has good recovery speed with iron audio off and is also not too shabby at unmasking if the iron audio is off and some iron discrimination is used.

Thanks for that review, Jeff.  I'm not familiar with the details of how the AT series operates.  From what you said (quote), is it fair to say that just ignoring the AT/Gold's Iron Audio setting completely (i.e. keeping it off), as if it doesn't exist, takes away this negative?

KG (George Wyant) and Ringy (Tim Saylor) get a lot of flack here.  (BTW, both are from Idaho and acquaintances of Gerry.  He speaks positively of them.)  Yes, they have a slapstick style performance and both are Garrett homers.  But if you can look past those (we all are capable, of course), there may be something to take away from their videos/TV show.  And people who have met them (e.g. a poster here not long ago -- don't remember who or what post/thread) also speak highly of them as people.  That matters in my book.

When I got back into detecting five years ago and started learning about modern detectors I noticed that they relic hunted with the Gold models, not the Pro.  I found that interesting.  Now that you've reviewed the AT/Gold yourself it's making more sense why they made that choice.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think KG and Ringy use the AT Gold for several reasons. It has a very good All Metal mode that is about an inch or so deeper than its discrim modes. No AM mode on the Pro. Despite the laws of single frequency detector physics and Garrett’s own hype, it is deeper than the AT Pro. Also, despite Garrett’s own insistence to describe the audio on the AT Gold and the “ Pro” audio on the AT Pro the same way, they are very different. The Gold audio and the Max audio are the same by the way. In Equinox terms, the recovery speed of the AT Gold’s audio is much faster and the tones are much shorter and cleaner. What is the same on both are the tone qualities of the obnoxious iron audio tone. 
 

In my opinion, the target separation and recovery speed of the AT Gold (not the AT Pro) without using iron audio is above average compared to similar vintage detectors and unmasking is about average. Using the iron audio for anything other than iron identification turns the AT Gold into an unspeakable mess. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

When I got my AT Pro I had looked at the AT Gold and the single only reason I didn't get it was they said it would not work at the beach according to Garrett's specs. Hind sight and how I hunt now using AM more than disc modes I think I would have like the AT Gold better.

As with the AT Pro and AT MAX, if you are using disc mode you can nudge the iron disc up until the base iron chatter trims out. This will let you keep iron audio on and not be blasted by the loud grunt. There is a reason Garrett put an "Iron Audio" on/off button but many seem to leave it on and complain.

Having iron audio in AM mode can be a huge plus, something my Nokta machines don't have so I have to always look down at the display when hitting a target.

Not sure how well a round wider coil would work in high mineralization. It may smother targets, not sure how much target separation you would lose over the stock or the smaller elliptical dd.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, kac said:

Not sure how well a round wider coil would work in high mineralization. It may smother targets, not sure how much target separation you would lose over the stock or the smaller elliptical dd.

My only issues with the stock 8.5X11” coil are its weight and where the lower stem attaches to it. It works otherwise just fine for coin, jewelry and open field relic hunting here. No way would I take that coil into the gold fields near me due to extreme mineralization.  If the Nel Super Fly works equally well or better at a substantially lower weight and with a centered coil mount, that will be a big plus. Personally, every Nel coil I’ve used has outperformed the similar sized stock coil. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it can be turned Off in AM mode. Every target will have a medium pitched proportional audio tone. If you want to use the iron audio On in AM you have to turn iron audio On and raise the discrimination level up from zero to a number in the iron range. If you turn iron audio Off again, your discrimination is automatically back to zero and you just get medium tones for all targets. I can turn it back On if I need to and the Gold remembers the discrimination setting I made previously.

Leaving it On continuously in All Metal for deep relic hunting or for very small gold nugget hunting in thick iron trash or hot rocks that register in the iron range is an exercise in extreme torture and makes hearing a faint, just breaking the threshold tone target impossible to hear and it can even obliterate larger targets too.

In situations like that I make sure I have brought my glasses, turn Off iron audio in AM most of the time and watch the screen a lot. Or, I use Disc 1 for target investigation with iron discrimination set around 32 which will break up most forged iron objects but not totally silence them and switch back and forth between AM and Disc 1 when I am griding an area.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

When I did my review the AT Gold was very unique - a waterproof nugget detector! Now that’s not so rare, but Garrett did it first. It’s still a solid little detector though, and not surprising to me many prefer it over the AT Pro, as that’s the way I’d go also between the two.

herschbach-nuggets-garrett-at-gold.jpg

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By mh9162013
      I mainly run a Minelab Vanquish 540 and search for coins and/or jewelry. So it's a rare occurrence for me to hear it sound off on iron or EMI.
      I recently acquired a barely used AT Max and compared to my 540, it sounds like it's nuts, with chatter like crazy. Some of this appears to be EMI. But it also seems to be super sensitivity to faint signals, especially iron.
      I used it outside for a bit and I usually needed to set the sensitivity to 2, 3 or 4 (out of eight) to stop the chatter. My understanding is that I have 3 realistic options to reduce chatter.
      One, I can adjust the frequency/channel (F1-F4) and see if that helps.
      Two, I can reduce the sensitivity while the machine is on. This seems to work, but I'm afraid it's killing my depth (although I don't know by how much).
      Three, I can set the sensitivity to 1 and turn off the machine. Then, turn it back on and only then, adjust the sensitivity to as high as I can get away with. The higher the sensitivity is set when turning it off, the more chatter I get when I turn it on.
      Are there any of things I can do to get a less fritzy machine?
      Any insight or experiences will be appreciated. Most likely I'll sell either this or one my Vanquishes and right now, the AT Max is getting clobbered by the 540. But to be fair, I've used the 540 for probably 50 or so hours and the AT Max for less than 2.
    • By JCR
      I purchased the new Viper coil for my AT Max and have run it thru my Test garden. I think it will do just what I had hoped; a little deeper than the excellent 5x8 with near matching separation coupled with the ground coverage of the stock 8.5X11. Very stable & sensitive.
    • By Dances With Doves
      With all the talk of Minelab dominating the prospecting part of metal detecting lately   how often has any one used a Garrett for gold prospecting in the last  few  years?  
    • By B0SC0
      Is it me, or am I missing something here.
      How do you tell how much battery capacity there is?
      I believe somewhere I was reading about the universal  Z-link  module led will blink with 3 hours left.
      Is this true for the headphones?
      If so, that would drive me crazy not knowing the level until then.
      Scenario: Leave the house to detect 6-8 hours or more, hour into the hunt led flashes, meaning only 3 hours left,  for a total of only 4 hours.
      This will cause me to recharge the headphones before every hunt. Even iIf they didn't really need it.
      Probably shorten battery life, too.
      If this is the case, maybe Garrett needs to add a battery level meter on the headphones or wireless to the AT MAX with an icon showing the level on the display.
      Your thoughts?
    • By N7XW
      Hello Detector Prospector forum!  I've been inactive in detecting for quite some time and am now getting back at it.  I've used this forum in the past and received great advice so I'm back for more. 
      I'd like to detect the national forest for gold particularly in the rivers and areas of exposed bedrock.  I currently have an AT Pro with multiple coils (among other machines but none are dedicated gold detectors).  I'm thinking of using the 5x8 and sniper coil.  I don't foresee spending a great deal of my time gold detecting, particularly due to the distance I would have to travel and lower chance of success as compared to coin detecting.  So, given this situation, my question is this - do you think I would be much better served by buying a dedicated gold machine?  I was thinking the AT Gold due to river detecting (waterproof).  But would the AT Pro do "almost" as well on gold?  Loaded question, I know.  How much difference does 3 kHz make in detecting small gold?  I'm going to do a little testing on small lead fragments to get an idea as to how small of a nugget the Pro will pick up.
      Thanks in advance!
       
    • By GB_Amateur
      I watch a lot of adventure shows on cable TV and this past Sunday evening Discovery Channel had a 2 hour long one titled "Everest's Greatest Mystery".
      To set the background for this post, in 1924 two British climbers (one quite experienced -- George Mallory, and a novice climber -- Andrew Irvine) disappeared from the view of others (below) within a few hundred meters of the summit, never to be heard from again.  It took 29 years until Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay accomplished and documented the supposed first human conquest of the summit, but questions remained.  Did Mallory and Irvine actually reach the summit and succumb in their descent?  In 1999 an expedition went to find Irvine, who carried the camera for the 1924 attempt, to hopefully determine if his photos would show that they reached the top.  That expedition ironically failed to find Irvine's body, but Mallory's instead.
      Four experienced (each with multiple Everest trips) climbers from the USA were filmed in a spring 2019 expedition for this program.  Their goal once again was to find Irvine and his camera.  The weather in 2019 was particularly bad (12 climbers perished) and they spent over a month at base camp (17,000 ft = 5200 m) or above.  Their ultimate trip lasted 3 consecutive days above 27,000 ft (8200 m), apparently shattering a record for most time consecutively at or above that altitude on Everest.  Although they carried supplemental oxygen, for most of that time they had to conserve it and breathe the 33% (relative to sea level) dense air.  At night the temperatures dipped to -20 F (-29 C) and although I don't recall the daytime temps I doubt they were much above 0 F (-18 C).  Those are air temps, not windchills.  (BTW, their high camps were set up by local guides who departed as soon as their task was complete.)
      I noticed a metal detector in the backpack of one of the expedition members, and he carried it all three days they searched near the summit.  That's pretty amazing when you consider the conditions:
      1) With so little oxygen, weight is critical.  Even carrying an extra pound matters a lot;
      2) At these temperatures I'm surprised a metal detector will even function;
      3) The setup and operation had to be simple and any searching looking for just metal signal or not.  The brain doesn't work well with low oxygen.
      As it turns out I never saw the detector being used, and I doubt it was.  The climbers wore ice crampons but much of the terrain was windblown and thus rocky, not icy.  Movement had to be delicate and anything held/carried in hand made it that much more dangerous.  Also, without snow/ice cover there was nowhere for metal to hide.  But that didn't stop the climber with the detector to bring it along every one of the three days they searched.  He had to have considered it quite important.
      Oh, you may be wondering which detector he had with him:  Garrett AT/Pro.
×
×
  • Create New...