Jump to content

Target ID / Vdi Numbers For Gold Nuggets And Gold Jewelry

Recommended Posts

Thank you, Steve Herschbach, for this scholarly dissertation...

THIS is why I bow towards Reno each time I turn on my detectors!


  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went to a beach on Monday that was so littered with garbage that I spent hours digging the same few types of items with a nickel or dime thrown in. With the exception of learning how all the valuable items sounded (since I didn't find any of those), I can attest to those readings. The nickels were reading just like the whole pull tabs, the dimes like small pieces or the old-style aluminum bits. I dug them all to get more familiarity with my GMT, and had to have the sensitivity dialed way down. It's just so sensitive to even the small bits of aluminum. Still haven't bothered to empty the pouch of all the junk...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The White's -95 to 0 to +95 VDI scale as far as I know was first explained well in the XLT Engineering Report by Mark Rowan. Here is an excerpt below. Note that extreme low VDI numbers are actually ground readings, and the extreme low VDI range is where your ground balance setting resides. Ground balance is just a type of discrimination. This VDI scheme has been used by White's since on the DFX, V3i, VX3, MXT, etc.

"For many years, White's has built detectors which identify targets based on a V.D.I. number (Visual Discrimination Indicator) which characterizes metallic objects according to their size, shape, and composition. The V.D.I. scale on the Spectrum XLT runs from -95 to +95. Large positive numbers typically indicate objects that are good electrical conductors; for example, silver dollars will come in at 92. Smaller positive numbers usually indicate objects which, because of their size, shape, or composition, are not as conductive; nickels will read about 20, and aluminum foil may come in near 5. Large negative numbers are typical of targets which are readily magnetized, but which conduct electricity poorly or not at all. Some sands or soils which have a high concentration of ferromagnetic minerals may read -93. Metals containing iron have both magnetic and conductive properties, which causes them to spread over a wide area of the scale, although most typically iron objects will fall in the range -30 to -75. (See Phase Chart).

The V.D.I. reading is an excellent way to determine the identity of most commonly occurring targets, although I might mention in passing that the only 100% reliable discriminator is called a shovel. However, as a famous metal detector engineer once said, "Life is grossly unfair" (actually, there is no such thing as a famous metal detector engineer, and life really is fair, it just doesn't want anybody to know). For one thing, the signal which a detector receives back from even moderately mineralized ground is typically much stronger than the signal it receives from the targets buried in it. This makes determining an accurate V.D.I. number for a target at any substantial depth a very challenging business indeed.

Furthermore, some targets will cause an abrupt change in V.D.I. response during the course of a single pass under the loop; the most notorious of these are the dreaded bottlecap and the dreaded small piece of foil near the surface in bad ground."


  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is an example of how Nokta and Makro use the same spread of items but change the numeric scale to run all positive from 0 to 100. Note again how the low end of the range is where ground readings reside, and how ferrous, salt, and ground all overlap to a degree. Garrett and First Texas employ similar VDI scales.

Due to a situation referred to as "ferrous wrap" some hot rocks and certain ferrous items can come in on the high end of the scale. This happens with White's and other brands also.

Note that the Nokta FORS CoRe, FORS Gold, etc, and original Makro Racer use 0-40 as ground/ferrous. First Texas does the same with the Teknetics T2 and Fisher Gold Bug Pro, etc.

The new Makro 2 compresses the ground/ferrous range into the 0-10 zone, whereas the Fisher F75 has 0-15 as ground/ferrous. In general, having more numeric range devoted to the non-ferrous portion of the scale is advantageous for jewelry hunters. It allows more room to separate a certain pesky aluminum tab from possible gold items.

The new Nokta Impact is quite unique in offering the choice of either 0-15 ferrous or 0-40 ferrous out of 100. Relic hunters or anyone just wanting to separate ferrous from non-ferrous tend to prefer the expanded ferrous range.




  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did up my own chart for the Minelab X-Terra 50 back when I had one. It in my opinion gives a good sense of the order in which common items without being too complicated. Note that the X-Terra 50 used a VDI scale running from -9 to 0 to +45, so it is compressed into a tighter range compared to the White's or Nokta/Makro scales. But again, the order in which items are found remains the same.

Tone     VDI  Items

Very Hi .45 Steel Halves, Dollars
Very Hi .42 Quarters, Large Silver Rings
High .... 39 Silver Rings
High .... 36 Penny/Dime, Small Silver Rings
High .... 33 IH Penny
High .... 30 Zinc Penny, IH Penny
High .... 27 Screw Cap, IH Penny, Large Aluminum
Medium 24 Heavy Square Tabs, $5 Gold, Very Lg Men's Rings
Medium 21 Large Pull Tabs, Large Men's Rings
Medium 18 Pull Tabs Men's Rings
Medium 15 Small Pull Tabs, Erasers, Small Mens Rings
Medium 12 Light Square Tabs, Nickels, Erasers, Beavertails, Lg Women's Rings
Medium 09 Beavertails, Heavy Foil, Erasers, Med Women's Rings
Medium 06 Medium Foil, Small Women's Rings
Medium 03 Light Foil, Small Jewelry
Low ..... -3 Wire, Pins, Very Small Jewelry
Low ..... -6 Nails
Low ..... -9 Hot Rock, Large Iron

Notes:  45 is more often a steel junk indication than the very rare dollar or half. Mens rings fall mostly into 21 followed by 24. Womens rings are heavy in 6 and 9 followed by 12. 18 is the heavy pull tab range and sparse on rings (too high for most women's rings, too low for most mens). 15 also has fewer rings but also less junk. All these observations are only true for my area and mix of targets and so must be taken with a large grain of salt, are are only intended as an aid to those just starting out. You can get junk in any segment, and good finds in any segment!

Here is a simplified version, a combination of most likely targets and "wishful thinking". 21 is more likely to be a large pull tab, but it is the hottest number for men's rings, at least out of my collection. 18 might be a ring, but fewer fall there than in lower or higher numbers, and it is very heavy in common pull tabs.

45 Steel
42 Quarter
39 Silver
36 Penny/Dime
33 IH Penny
30 Zinc Penny
27 Screw Cap
24 Large Men's Ring
21 Men's Ring
18 Large Tab
15 Small Tab
12 Nickel
09 Womens Ring
06 Small Women's Ring
03 Foil
-3 Wire
-6 Nails
-9 Hot Rock

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is the final thought for the night. Back when Fisher did the CZ series of detectors they did lots of ring testing. They tested 255 rings for the CZ-70 and came up with some interesting percentages. I have seen these percentages reflected in the field.

2% of the rings were in the copper penny, dime, quarter range.

4% of the rings were in the zinc penny/screw cap range

49% of the rings were in the "pull tab" range above U.S. nickel

10% of the rings were in the nickel range

36% of the rings were in the foil range below nickel

0% of the rings were in the iron range

Now look at my simplified X-Terra VDI chart in the post immediately above. What we are seeing is the difference between women's rings and men's rings. Women's rings tend to be small high quality rings, and cluster in the foil range. They are the rings most likely to have stones and be of high value. Men's rings are significantly larger and heavier, and fall into the area above U.S. nickel. There is a weak spot or gap between women's and men's rings in the nickel range. This is of course a gross generality but I have found it to be true in my own detecting. You can use this to good effect when looking at an area and deciding what might be found there. Is the area more likely to hold men's rings and women's rings? The football field will more likely have men's rings. The shallow childs wading area or tot lot will lean women's rings. I do a lot of heavy surf detecting, and nearly all my finds are men's rings.

I have mentioned the Fisher CZ detectors. Rumor has it that CZ stood for "Coin Zapper". The CZ detector are unique in having a shuffled discrimination scale that puts nickels up high with the other coins. Little attention is paid to the fact they also lumped the bulk of the ring zones together. In addition to visual target identification, the CZ  has 3-tone, audio target ID. A low tone is for iron, a medium tone Is for pull tabs and foil and a high tone is for coins. A fourth tone, which sounds like a telephone, alerts you to large, shallow targets that are usually (but not always!) trash.

Basically with a CZ, low tone is iron, medium tone the ring range, and high tone the coin range. The newest model, the CZ-3D adds a fourth tone to the scheme designed to capture old coins in the zinc penny range, but for jewelry detecting the original CZ scheme is pretty simple and ingenious.

The good news is with newer detectors that have custom tone id ranges you can duplicate this setup yourself. Fisher also offers this modified tone scheme in the F75 models. The main thing is to be aware, no matter what detector you are using, or where the possible ring "hot spots" are on the VDI scale depending on where you are hunting.

From Fisher CZ-70 Pro Owners Manual, page 24 (tones added):



  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, what follows is not a recommendation. It is simply what I tend to do. Others have other ideas.

More often than not when park hunting for jewelry I focus first on deciding on a good site. For me that means anywhere hands are in action making tossing, pushing, or flinging motions. Soccer fields and children's swings are classic examples. If I think the site is good, I simply dig all non-ferrous targets.

However, if time is limited and my patience thinner than normal I might do two other things. If I really am just hot to chase gold I may very well just knock out the entire high end coin range except for quarters. Seems like lots of quarters out there these days and they add up fast. You might question the dollar area but that is normally large junk.

IH Penny................Reject
Zinc Penny.............Reject
Screw Cap.............Accept
Large Men's Ring...Accept
Men's Ring.............Accept
Large Tab...............Accept
Small Tab...............Accept
Womens Ring.........Accept
Sm Womens Ring...Accept
Hot Rock.................Reject

Again, it is normally just dig all non-ferrous targets. But if cherry picking I may skip most coins, especially zinc pennies. Yes, rings could appear there, but you have to call your shots as you please. So with that in mind if my time is really limited and I really have no patience, I may go to my final cherry pick mode. Skip the quarters also, and the screw caps, and the very light foil. There can be lots of light foil out there and the gold you might find there will be tiny stuff, like ear rings or thin chains.

IH Penny................Reject
Zinc Penny.............Reject
Screw Cap.............Reject
Large Men's Ring...Accept
Men's Ring.............Accept
Large Tab...............Accept
Small Tab...............Accept
Womens Ring.........Accept
Sm Womens Ring...Accept
Hot Rock.................Reject

That zone is where you are going to find the majority of gold jewelry items by weight. If in an area where men's rings are a big factor, then opening up the screw cap and even zinc penny range makes sense. Where women's jewelry is prevalent keeping that light foil area open makes sense. Conversely, if you get into a place where one certain type of pull tab is driving you crazy, you may want to knock it out.

There are no clear answers here. It is all about time, patience, and calling the odds based on your experience. There are other strategies, like just digging nice, clean, solid sounding signals. I tend to always stick with shallow targets that require nothing more than a pinpointer and screwdriver to recover, as plugging takes too much time. Recovering huge volumes of targets matters, and plugging causes too much damage if done every foot. My standard procedure is just pop out any non-ferrous target my pinpointer can hit. If my pinpointer can't detect it it is too deep and so I move on to the next target. And as noted above I may vary my disc settings to suit my mood or circumstances.

Great books to help you out from Clive Clynick at http://www.clivesgoldpage.com/



  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very impressed with your compilation of information Steve, thanks, yet again.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Similar Content

    • By Skullgolddiver
      For First I wanna Say Hi to all of You here...
      I've been far for quite a long time due to mandatory work sessions in the "other Life".
      The pandemic pushed hard on my little beach business and to pay Bills and keep my little daughter I started again with people transportation in the end of August.
      Today I was finally out for a day off walking on the beach and Also found a "promising spot to get the job done"...
      But the tone of this post Is more related to a new beach machine I'm dreaming to own for Christmas.
      So I Ask to You, my fellows beach Hunters...What Will You buy considering a Ctx, an Excal and a TDI Beachunter already owned?
      Cause the First Is a sniper discriminator but not that Deep like a Nox...(And not properly waterproof both of them)
      The second Is maybe the unstoppable pleasure Toy for a diver like me, but blind on chains and thin stuff...
      The third of my guns already drowned and reanimated a couple times, Will be my pulse last option to never remain without a machine in case of the 3rd world war...
      So...What's next?
    • By Hibernia1776
      Hi everyone, I wanted to start a new thread so I could update everyone. As you know I lost a gold ring in 1981 and  have been hunting for it for 40 years, here go’s.
      I went out Friday night and Saturday night until 10:00 pm and continued my grid search and marked promising signals with wooden stakes. I went back to the yard Sunday and began digging what I had marked with no luck, it was all junk.
      As I got further and further out into the yard the targets got fewer and fewer and I couldn’t imagine the ring could be that far away so After about 3 hours of searching I moved back up to where I had always thought I had lost the ring, up near the fence.
      I spent another hour or so digging the few questionable signals that were left  and this time using mainly the vanquish and pinpointing with the Tesoro because I have a hard time pinpointing on vanquish.
      I scanned over a spot I had crossed over literally hundreds of times and I got a faint signal of an 8 on the vanquish and occasionally jumping to 9, I circled it and it was faint but solid 8 and the depth gauge had all the segments filled, it was very deep. I used the pinpoint and dug and come up with nothing, I scanned the hole and still had that faint signal so I got the Tesoro and used pinpoint but heard nothing. 
      I decided to dig a little deeper and still didn’t find anything, scanned again with vanquish and still had the signal so I Got the Tesoro and put it in all metal and was able to run sensitivity maxed out. Next I scraped off some dirt off the top so I could get the Tesoro a little deeper into the ground and started scanning and I got a faint/whisper on pinpoint.
      While I was pinpointing I noticed this time the pinpoint seemed 2-3 inches North of the hole I was digging. I plunged the digger  back in the hole and pulled out a shovel or two of dirt and looked in the hole and saw nothing. I pushed the pinpointer into the hole and immediately it sounded off. Now before I go further I want to say that this had happend literally hundreds of times before, maybe only a few times Had they been this deep.
      I stuck my hand down in the hole and grabbed a handful of dirt and when I pulled it out I saw it....for the first in 40 years I laid eyes on the ring that had twirled off my finger so long ago. I can not describe feeling. From the day I lost that ring it never left my mind, everytime I stepped in that yard I wondered where that ring was for 40 years. It would not be an exaggeration to say that I probably dug 300-500 holes  off and on over the years starting back in 1992/93with a Garret freedom two plus, then on to the Tesoro silver then on to the ML vanquish.
      Why was I unable to find until now? I believe I have a better understanding now after finding it. When I started back in 92 I didn’t have very much knowledge and was digging anything that fell between iron and pull tab. Next at some point my mom had dug up a small row of dirt and planted monkey grass right thru where the ring was so I had at least for the last 5 years when I went out there I could not detect there because of the grass, I thought about this maybe 6 months ago and ran over the monkey grass and it all died out, this allowed me to search on top of it. I believe though the number one reason I could not find it is because of what you guys call “iron masking”...I had swung coil over this exact spot literally hundreds of times and dug trash out of it and within inches of it several times, I think I finally cleared out enough for the ring to come through, it is actually much smaller than I remember and a minor miracle I was able to find it at all.
      i want to thank everyone that replied because I did everything you guys said but the number one thing was everyone gave me hope, I was literally fearing that I would never find this ring but the reply’s gave me hope. As you can see from the pics the ring probably wouldn’t get me 20 bucks  at a pawn shop but it is priceless to me, my grandfather was born in 1915 and this was his childhood ring and now I don’t have to live with the regret that I Lost it or wonder the rest of my life what happend to it. One more thing, when I lost the ring I mentally logged in my mind where it fell off and vowed to never forget it and find it one day...after 40 years it was exactly where I thought it always was....right where if fell of 40 years ago. I’m not exactly sure how but the ring was probably 9-10 inches deep. Enjoy the pics. 

    • By Hibernia1776
      Guys I lost a ring in 1981 in a very specific spot in my parents yard when I was 14. I bought a Garret freedom two in about 92 and could never find it. I bought a Tesoro silver about 5 years ago and still couldn’t find it so I thought I needed a detector with a digital readout so I bought a Minelab vanquish. The area I lost the ring in is probably no bigger than 15x25 feet and I have taken probably 150 items out of the ground in that small area nails, screws,, nuts, bolts, coins, tinfoil etc...My parents passed and the house is going up for sale this Thursday. With the Tesoro I usually would set the disc at the iron and then thumb the knob to just pass pull tab and anything that got choppy or disappeared From foil to tab I dug. I bought the Minelab and have used jewelry mode and dug anything that registered 0-25 I dug and to no avail. A lot of times I will get a signal and the signal might be 15 then -3 or minus 4 and I have dug all of those. I have dug so much that their is literally nothing left that gives a clean signal, I am literally now in all metal mode and trying to dig everything, I even called a guy from ringfinders and he said he probably couldn’t find it and didn’t want to look for it. I was a skinny 14 year old when in lost it so it’s. Its not a huge ring but it was big enough to have the letter “R” engraved on the front, I guess it’s called a signet ring. Can anyone on here give me any suggestions as I am not that experienced using metal detectors. The ring is purely sentimental value having been my grandfathers, then my fathers and then mine. Does anyone have any suggestions? I have also searched further out into the yard thinking possibly the mower had flung it out in the yard but still nothing. Help please.
    • By Erik Oostra
      It's weird how your luck can change week by week.. Last week started off great with a gold ring and finished even greater with a diamond bracelet.. But so far this week it's been nothing at all.. except a 5 cent piece and a load of bottle tops, pull-tabs and aluminium foil etc.. But this is not what makes it weird, the weird thing is that this week comes at the end of the school holidays and a long-weekend public holiday.. It's been a long time since there's been so many people on the island, you couldn't wish for a bigger crowd.. And yet, nothing.. 😬 
    • By Steve Herschbach
      The whole depth with single frequency VLF detectors thing in my opinion has been nothing but a red herring for decades. I have read a thousand posts from people wanting VLF detectors with "more depth". Yet VLF detectors maxed out for usable depth by at least 1990 if not before. I have not used any single frequency VLF metal detector since 1990 that got more depth on coins than my old Compass Gold Scanner Pro.

      The only real improvement we have seen and are still seeing is in the ability to find and correctly identify items that are masked by the ground itself or adjacent undesirable targets. There are an amazing number of targets in the ground at depths achievable by any decent detector made in the last 25 years, but that are being missed because they are improperly identified and ignored, or just completely masked and invisible. This is an area where the Minelab BBS and FBS detectors have excelled. They do not go deeper. They simply get more accurate discrimination at depths exceeding what most detectors achieve. Machines like the DEUS and a lot of other Euro machines are excelling not for the depth they get, but this ability to acquire and accurately identify targets at shallower depths that are missed by other detectors.

      If we had a detector that could simply see through everything and accurately identify coins to 10" the ground would light up with countless missed finds. I get a chuckle out of all the deep coins I see people talk about on the forums when the best detectors made can't accurately identify a dime past 5-6 inches in my soil. Anything deeper just gets called ferrous. There is huge room for improvement in metal detectors still not by getting more depth, but by simply finding shallower targets that have been missed by other detectors made up until now.
      How To Make Yourself Crazy!
      U.S. Versus Euro Style Detectors
    • By Againstmywill
      I went out tonight to a local football field with the exclusive goal of digging a gold chain. Before going out, I looked on this forum to see what numbers I should be looking for. I came across this (thanks 😊) 
      and used the +4-5 range as my target numbers. I know gold chains can come in other numbers, but I had about an hour to detect. While all the numbers in that range turned out to be aluminum, I ran across a solid 9 and had to dig. While it is not a chain, it's the next best thing. I scanned around the pendant, but all the +1-4 targets were foil and aluminum. I always use Park 1, but tonight for kicks, I used Park 2. Not sure it made the difference, but I have been over that area with Park 1 in the past.
      Park 2, 7 recovery, 17 sensitivity, all metal, 15" coil

  • Create New...