Steve Herschbach

SDC 2300

I would like an Import/Export function for XChange. Other than that I am pretty well set.

Good tip Mitchel, thanks!

I have to admit when it come to urban metal detecting that I tend to think it is better to ask forgiveness than permission. There are various little rules on the books that can be interpreted by almost any government type person as prohibiting metal detectors, even though that was never the intent of the rule. What park does not have a rule about "defacing the grounds"? Many of these government people don't know the rules for sure, and the knee jerk reaction from anyone who is unsure is to just deny permission. I try to apply good common sense about where to dig or not and where the law is clear I abide by the law. Like no detecting in National Parks - the law is very clear on that. The most important thing is I try to be invisible. Detect oddball hours, detect on rainy days, detect on holidays, but whenever possible detect when you are going to be observed by a few eyeballs as possible. A little discretion goes a long way. We all tend to worry about it but the reality is that anyone actually being cited, fined, or punished in any way for normal casual metal detecting is incredibly rare. You are far more likely in a worst case scenario to simply be warned. This really is a situation where law enforcement had better things to do than chase around seniors with metal detectors. However, if a member of the public complains for any reason, they are duty bound to investigate. Again, a good reason to avoid people if at all possible. A visit to the local club nearest the location you wish to hunt and some low key inquiries about law enforcement actions against detectorists can give you clues about just how hot the water may or may not be.

The problem is First Texas is missing a window of opportunity if it takes too much longer. The new Minelab Gold Monster 1000 just took a big chunk out of the "turn on and go" gold detector market. Presumably as a two frequency detector the CZX will bring something new to the table. So far engineers have chosen single frequency due to its ability to deliver more punch on targets in a specific conductive range. Dave's previous offering in this area, the CZ models, run at 5 kHz and 15 kHz, a 3:1 ratio. The CZX is claiming 9:1 and if the low end remained 5 kHz the upper end would be 45 kHz, a solid gold frequency. So I am imagining a "hot CZ" but with the GM1000 at $799 with two coils and the TDI SL just reduced to $989 it's going to have to either reject ground better than the GM1000 or hit small gold better than the TDI SL. Nothing at all has been said about the discrimination capability of the CZX, if any. I took the announcement above as implying the first version might be all metal only with the mention of discrimination going missing like it is. This information is now so old however we really have no idea as to what final unit features may look like. Time will tell, but hopefully not too much more time. Like you Mark I hope we see this detector this year. The First Texas model shuffling and price reductions seem to indicate this might be in the cards, but that could just as well be an attempt to keep the sales afloat while the new models undergo further refinement. Although this year would be nice my bet is now on 2018. Unless the project stalled entirely. Some good ideas just never come to fruition and the recent hire pointing to a renewed push by First Texas in the area of pulse induction might indicate this is just not working out.

Hi Alex, Welcome to the forum! I have to admit I have been using the Gold Monster 1000 mostly without headphones. The places I hunt are normally quiet and the GM1000 speaker has plenty of volume. The headphones that come with the unit are not bad but I prefer models that fit completely over my ear, instead of resting on my ears like the ones included with the Monster. Almost any headphones will work if you use the proper adapter - the GM1000 sports a 1/8" headphone socket instead of the industry standard 1/4". The Pro-Sonic and other wireless systems will also work fine with the proper adapters. Currently, the ONLY coils that will work on the GM1000 are the two sizes that come with it. I hope we see more in the future, especially a 14" elliptical. Good job on the 12V cable - if I did not already have cigarette style cables I might do that myself.

Discover Magazine Some of you might remember a publication called "Discover" that White's Electronics used to publish. It featured customer finds, treasure stories, and all-around good info on metal detecting. Back in the 90's we stopped making it, much to the disappointment of some of our long-time customers. Well... we realized missed it too! So we're proud to announce the re-introduction of Discover magazine. As a part of our mailing list you have exclusive access to a free digital copy, which you can read online, print out, and share as you see fit. Get your free copy here. We'll try and send one out every 2 months. Thanks for supporting an American brand, and know that we will always have your back as a valued customer. This publication is just one small thing we can do to show our appreciation! Discover Magazine July/August 2017 Discover Magazine May/June 2017 Discover Magazine March/April 2017 Discover Magazine January/February 2017 Sincerely, White's Electronics

White's quietly instituted a summer sale (ends in August) that resulted in some steep price drops for some models. The TDI SL was dropped from MSRP $1299.95 to $1099.95 which in turn created a Minimum Advertised Price (MAP) of only $989. As ground balancing PI (GBPI) detectors go the TDI SL is no powerhouse, but this price reduction puts it firmly in VLF country as far as the hit it will put on your pocketbook. If you have a VLF and places it refuses to work due to intense ground and hot rocks, this presents an affordable potential solution.

Part of the problem in Australia is you blokes pay such outrageously high prices for detectors. I would blame it on importing but you even pay more for Minelab models. The bottom line is that it makes machines like the TDI that are quite inexpensive in the U.S. far less competitive in Australia. The TDI SL is going for only US$989 right now in the U.S. whereas it is AUS$1985 in Australia!

I hope we see you more around the forum Ray. I missed my Gold Bug Pro and picked up the Teknetics G2 version recently. Part of the rational there is that the Gold Bug Pro / G2 at 19 kHz performs as well as any machine I have ever used running 19 kHz and so it makes a good benchmark/comparison detector. I have more to do comparing the GM1000 and GBP/G2 but the GM1000 appears to easily meet or beat the G2 on gram type nuggets at a sensitivity setting of about 6-7. The G2 lower frequency does start to have an edge when the nuggets get up to around 1/4 oz and larger but for the run of the mill smaller stuff the GM1000 appears to be the hot ticket. Very preliminary stuff but my impressions mirror yours.

That says a lot coming from somebody who is (was?) a big TDI supporter.

That is a really great post - thank you for sharing your knowledge with forum members!

Like nearly every report I have read so far - sounds good! Thanks Clark. Maybe this month the elliptical will finally be available.

Any missed signal is a misssed signal. It is no doubt possibly for wireless headphones to drop the audio for various reasons, and if that happens right when you go over a target you could miss it. My take is I won't be losing any sleep over this one.

Right now the review is only available to subscribers but copies will no doubt show up on the XP website soon. Here is a link to Andy's earlier commentary of the HF coils http://www.xpmetaldetectorsamericas.com/blog/category/field-tests/ Sure could have used that elliptical coil the last month to compare to the Gold Monster. Area of 22.5cm round coil = 397 sq cm Area of 24cm x 13cm elliptical coil = 245 sq cm (about 62% of the area covered by the coil above)

I get my settings done first, then scan. Right now I am prospecting. That means a factory reset when turning on. Sensitivity to 13, threshold to 7.5 (with headphones; 7 is silent, 7 a bare buzz), and volume to 4. Frequency scan while pointing coil towards nearest obvious source of interference, like cell tower or another detector nearby. Having the pinpointer on is imperative - good call. Then finally ground balance if required. If you have real saline water you will need to deal with it via either the disc setting or by ground balancing. I did some checking to remind myself of something I knew but had forgot. The disc function is a "bottom up" control in that wherever it is set, everything at or below the setting is rejected. The ground balance is more like a notch discrimination setting however, only rejecting in a specific range. That being the case you always want to use ground balance to eliminate salt signals BEFORE applying any discrimination. If the ground balance does it alone, then use no discrimination. If you need to use it, use the lowest setting possible. From the ATX Owners Manual page 28: Saltwater Operation When mixed with water, salt and other electrolytes become conductive and may therefore cause any detector to respond as if the saltwater were a metal target. In fact, to a detector, saltwater has an electrical conductivity very similar to foil, fine gold and other poor conductors. Traditionally with pulse detectors, to address the saltwater response the Delay/Discrimination setting was increased until the saltwater response was sufficiently eliminated. This method, although effective, can significantly reduce the detection of fine gold, jewelry, and other poor conductors due to the increased Discrimination setting. Therefore, to help reduce this undesirable loss of detection, the ATX has an alternative method to address saltwater. Specifically, the ATX can automatically ground balance out the saltwater response without the need to increase Discrimination; thereby maintaining a better response to fine gold, jewelry, and other poor conductors. (emphasis added). The two methods to address saltwater are: 1) Ground Balance Method: Leave Discrimination set to minimum and Ground Balance to the saltwater as would be done for any other ground. This method will provide the best detection of fine gold, etc., but will produce a low-tone response for all targets. It is important to Ground Balance the detector when it moves to a new region of the beach (i.e. from wet sand to dry sand at the water's edge). 2) Traditional Discrimination Method: Incrementally increase the Discrimination setting until the saltwater response is sufficiently eliminated, typically around 3–7. Ground Balance is not required with this method. This method will maintain normal high and low tone responses, but will have reduced detection of fine gold, etc. Reduce the Discrimination setting toward zero when moving from wet sand to dry. For either method, the following basic techniques will help to achieve the best performance. 1. Swing the searchcoil flat and at a constant height. Do not bounce the coil or lift the coil at the end of swings. 2. Hunt the three different regions of the beach (dry sand, wet sand, submerged) one at a time rather than going back and forth between regions. This will allow the detector to be set optimally for each region. 3. Swing the searchcoil parallel to the water's edge to minimize changes in moisture levels within a given swing. The detector may become less stable in shallow, breaking surf where the searchcoil is in and out of the saltwater. In this area the detector is encountering a constantly changing environment produced by the surf, making it more difficult for the detector to stabilize. Experiment with the two methods above to determine which you prefer, and if necessary, reduce Sensitivity to obtain stable operation. On that last statement, note that when nugget detecting I am running sensitivity 13 and while detecting in Hawaii sensitivity at 7.

The Makro and Nokta 9.5" x 5" DD closed elliptical design has been discontinued in favor of a open style design for the Impact, the IM24. The new design is not bouyant like the old design and so will be popular with water hunters in particular. Part numbers for the new coil are available for other Makro and Nokta models There is also a new 5" round coil for the Nokta Impact. RC24 Black 14 kHz - Racer 1 (Red Racer) and Racer 2 FC24 Black 15 kHz - FORS CoRe FR24 Black 19 kHz - FORS Relic FGP24 White 19 kHz - FORS Gold+

"Righto, this is based on my last 4 or 5 trips combined. Today was the 2nd time I've been able have 2 QED,s on the ground as well as a GPX 4500 and a souped up GP 3000 to compare." https://www.prospectingaustralia.com.au/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=341762#p341762 https://www.prospectingaustralia.com.au/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=341951#p341951 QED Thread On This Forum

With the effort you are putting in it is just a matter of time. An impressive pile of finds regardless!

I am using the GM1000 pretty much exclusively with the large coil. I have no issues with coil knocking but I am usually running exclusively in deep seeking all metal mode with Auto+1 or manual sensitivity between 6 and 8.

Whenever I turn on first thing each day I usually do a full reset by holding the pinpoint button down while turning the detector on. The main thing this does is return to a neutral ground balance setting. I will always do this if moving to a new location. ATX FACTORY/DEFAULT SETTINGS Mode: Motion Discrimination: 1 (Lowest Setting) Sensitivity: 10 Threshold: 7 Volume: 10 Ground Balance: Neutral Ground Track: Off Ground balance is a filter that can rob performance if applied more aggressively than is warranted. If you have no magnetic content in the sand you may want to try and run the ATX without employing any ground balance at all. Doing the factory reset insures you start clean with nothing retained from the last session. If you employ no ground balance you are in the more powerful "straight PI" mode. Expect there to be some response to wet sand but it is normally manageable, especially higher on the beach. Running without ground balance usually means moving the coil slower than normal to let the threshold autotune keep up with the audio variations. Play with the sensitivity setting to see how high it can be set and still have a stable detector. If the wet salt sand still signals too much, you need to add ground balance, discrimination, or both. I have not experimented enough to know which has less impact on performance - using the disc control exclusively or just the ground balance. I have usually used a combination of both. My settings for in water use in Hawaii were Disc 3, Sensitivity 7, and fully ground balanced underwater to salt range. These would be worst case type settings. Time invested in on site experimentation is time well spent. Garrett ATX In Hawaii

The Deus Silencer setting is like most filters. Nearly all work by trying to eliminate weak signals in favor of stronger signals. This being the case, applying a filter always results in some loss of depth and sensitivity. The trick is that that problem you are trying to fix (false signal) has to be worse than the problem you cause (decreased sensitivity). The Silencer is supposed to reduce faint spurious signals created in dense ferrous trash. Let's say on a scale of 1 - 10 most good targets beep at 6 and above, but you are getting lots of distracting faint 1 and 2 signals. Increasing the Silencer can greatly reduce these faint false signals allowing you to concentrate on the better signals. Now on a later hunt this spot is "cleaned out" and you want to find what you missed. It may be that one of the faint 1 - 2 signals is a faint good target. By reducing the Silencer setting or turning it off, you now get these faint hits. Thirty are false signals but one is that nice silver coin you were looking for. Of course they could just as easily all turn out to be trash. Basically, I leave filters turned off unless forced to use them. I know when this is because I am ready to give up because of too many false signals or "noise". Apply just enough filter to do the trick, and no more. As always it is an individual thing as we all have different tolerance levels both for noisy detectors and for the amount of trash we are willing to dig to get a good item. People who do run detectors noisy basically don't trust the machine to do the filtering and prefer to use their ears instead. This can be fatiguing and a judicious application of a filter can result at the least in a more pleasant detecting experience.

The original post in this thread has been picked up as a Treasure Talk entry at http://www.minelab.com/anz/go-minelabbing/treasure-talk/early-season-gold

A perfect ground balance would have absolutely no audio change when the coil is raised and lowered over the ground. If audio is produced such that it sounds like a target when you sweep the ground, you need to work with the ground balance and sensitivity. In a perfect world you eliminate ground effects with these controls. However, the worse the ground (worse meaning you have to keep playing with detector controls) the more often you have to adjust. I have been on a lot of ground where I can set the ground balance in the morning and forget it. And then you have Rob's ground - every ten feet. Remember, ground balance is about obtaining a smooth threshold sound. If you achieve that, numbers flashing mean nothing really. You actually do not need the screen. I can tape over the screen and run the machine just fine.