dewcon4414 Posted April 11, 2018 Share Posted April 11, 2018 Yes .... if those conditions exsist, but oddly with that moisture chatty effect the machine will still read default 0 GB in auto or somewhere near 14.... its not EMI you can hold the coil up and hear nothing but a nice steady threshold. Tracking works ...... but you really loose depth. Better off to leave it ... or auto GB. Heck im debating if i even need to GB..... ive not found a lot of difference ..... except tracking isnt as deep i did test that..... here anyway. This will really very i believe depending on location. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chase Goldman Posted April 12, 2018 Share Posted April 12, 2018 I have not noticed any depth impact with tracking...but only used it under very mineralized conditions which enable it to periodically and reliably grab a ground reading and also because the ground balance point changes significantly over short distances. Leaving tracking off under these conditions could definitely affect depth if I was not frequently auto or manually rebalancing. If tracking is giving you the right GB number, I do not understand how it can impact depth. Under very mild conditions such as in sugar sand, then the tracking algorithm may not work reliably at all and I can see that you would not want to run it for fear of getting an off-the-wall GB point. But in that case, Auto GB pumping would also likely be as unreliable, so it would probably be best to leave GB at 0 under those circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now