Guest Tnsharpshooter Posted December 22, 2018 Share Posted December 22, 2018 I like park 2 and field 2 for more polluted sites. For raw depth park 2, unless I want to run gold 1 mode. Tones provided using field 2 are more gentle sounding to the ear. Can be picked out easier for me out of iron false/wrap. Just has a rthym to it. Park 2 more harsh sounding tone wise on nonferrous and can be easier confused with ferrous reporting. I have personally witnessed some field 2 located targets in polluted sites, using park 2 over these located targets (nonferrous) tone was cut off somewhat vs field 2 signal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
groundscanner Posted December 23, 2018 Author Share Posted December 23, 2018 Thanks TSS for the additional info! I am sure that it will take me many more hours of practice to be proficient at translating the subtle tones differences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now