Jump to content
Mada

2nd Machine And Frequencies

Recommended Posts

Hi all

If I'm using a vlf/lf that is over 40khz, is there any benefit to getting a 2nd machine that runs under 40 kHz when prospecting? Assume PI is not possible at the moment. Does a sub 40 bring anything special to the table? I'm a beginner so just curious

Thanks

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You didn't specify what detector you're using above 40khz, if it's the GB2 at 71khz then yes, a lower frequency machine will handle ground better and will also go deeper.

This chart from the Gold Monster may help you

minelab-gold-monster-frequency-range-compared.jpg

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Phrunt

You're right, I should have explained myself better. I currently have a Sea Hunter Mk2 I use at the beach and snorkeling. My partner has the GB2 to go prospecting. I'm looking at getting a prospecting machine and was wondering whether I should look at a lower frequency machine such as the xterra705, Equinox etc? Is the GM1000 sufficiently different to the GB2......? I'm working on the assumption that if we're out together a different machine may help fill the gaps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the GM1000 would be a wise choice if your partner already has a GB2 although a Equinox 800 paired with the 6" coil will give basically the same results as the GM and then you have an excellent multi purpose waterproof detector you can use for other things should you wish to, including the beach which sounds like something you use the Sea Hunter for.

The Equinox and GM will do better on small gold than the X-Terra.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that Phrunt. I think I read on this forum that anything over the 30-40 khz were pretty similiar that's why I was thinking maybe something like the xterra 705 gold or something similar under 20 khz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Gold Bug Pro at 19khz, I'd never pick to use it over the GM1000 or Equinox for prospecting.  The good thing about the Equinox is if you find a reason you want to run 20khz,  you can... it's very versatile.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally, even though I really liked the X-Terra Gold 705, it cannot approach the versatility or excellence of the Equinox 800.

Jeff

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Higher frequencies will produce the best air tests on all gold targets. However, higher frequencies also react more to the ground and hot rocks. Lower frequencies lose some "depth" in air tests, in particular as regards the smaller targets. However, lower frequencies are also less reactive to the ground and to hot rocks. This means that lower frequencies can be of benefit for a VLF detector in severe ground and hot rocks. You basically give up some theoretical gold sensitivity in return for less reactivity to the ground and the hot rocks. If the ground is so bad it makes the higher sensitivity machine unusable this is a decent trade. You will still do ok on the larger gold, leading to some misunderstanding that lower frequencies are better on large nuggets. Well, sort of, but generally only in very bad ground. Keep in mind most gold is small so going low frequency just to chase large gold is not the best strategy. If that is the idea, get a PI detector. I suppose if you were on a tight budget trying to hunt large gold in very bad ground a low frequency VLF would be a possibility, but a White's TDI SL is an affordable and better PI option for such situations. It’s not a black and white answer type thing though. I could see a lower frequency VLF being the better option over a PI in a high mineral/high trash area.

You did not mention but it seems like you may be wanting the detector for more than just gold nugget detecting. If that is so, general purpose lower frequencies like 12 -19 kHz are better options. If you are in a park you do not want extreme sensitivity to all the zillions of bits of tiny trash. General purpose machines are purposefully "less hot" for that very reason. If you actually want a general purpose machine that is a whole different can of worms I will ignore for the time being in favor of the original question. I will point out that your mention of the Equinox as a "lower frequency" machine is not entirely accurate since the 800 runs up to 40 kHz while also offering low frequency options.

Both the Minelab Gold Monster at 45 kHz and the new White's Goldmaster 24K at 48 kHz target that frequency range for giving the best balance of performance of the type of gold most U.S. prospectors are likely to encounter in quantity, especially now that most areas have been pounded with PI detectors. I wish I could tell you a low frequency VLF is a great option but it’s this basic truth we all have to deal with - the big nuggets get found first and PI blows VLF away in that regard.

The Gold Bug 2 at 71 kHz is the reigning master of tiny gold, but pays the price in poor penetration in bad ground. The real benefit however is both these newer machines are employing the very latest in digitally processed ground balancing that allows them to better work in ground where such high gain machines would previously have had more difficulty. This does not mean they equal PI detectors in that regard, as some people incorrectly assume. It's just that they do as good as machines in their class can do handling bad ground.

Both the Minelab Gold Monster and White's Goldmaster 24K have performance close enough that I consider them roughly equivalent and I am happy to use either. The choice should be made on the scales of simplicity versus adjustability. The Monster is made with as few controls and adjustments as is possible, whereas the 24K has more control options than most nugget detectors. The Monster may seem constraining to some and the 24K too complicated to others, so I recommend looking at the owners manuals for both at the links above when making the decision between them.

White's Goldmaster 24K Advanced Ground Tracking Explained

 

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mada, you asked some very good questions for a beginner. Let me offer a few thoughts regarding IN-GROUND performance. First off, there is NOT as much performance difference between frequencies as some advertising would imply. A properly tuned GBII (71khz) in MILD ground can find flakes of gold as small as 1/20 grain. But in MODERATE ground you will rarely find anything smaller than 1/10th grain, and then only at seriously reduced depth. My Goldmaster 24k (48 khz) can find 1/15th grainers in moderate ground, and it SCREAMS over 1/10th grainers. When it comes to actually finding gold, to be honest about it, there really is NOT much differance between 1/20th or  1/15th grainers or 1/10th grainers. Furthermore, the White's MXT (14 khz) with the 950 coil can find 1/4 grainers in moderate soil. To recap:  71 khz: 1/20 grain; 48 khz: 1/15th grain; 14 khz: 1/4 grain. It really would be splitting hairs at this point. But, there are other factors which far overshadow operating frequency, and these include the size and type of searchcoil, decibel output of headphones, operator expertise, sweep speed, etc. MY two-machine line-up: Goldmaster 24k and TDI-SL. Hope this helps; HH Jim

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By notfairchild
      Can you guys suggest me a country that let people pan for gold without any / or special permission ? 
      My goal is to make over $100 Everyday 
      Thank you in advance 
    • By hawkeye
      Recently read Lucky's post about his Rye Patch adventure.  Nice job guys and gal.  He mentioned "we cover hundreds of acres with our coils a day".  I'm pretty sure he didn't mean that literally, it just felt that way.  Anyway, it got me wondering how much ground are we covering with our coil in day.
      For the sake of simplicity let's assume we are swinging a 12" coil in a 6' arc.  Therefore we cover 6 sq. ft each swing.  To cover an acre (43560 sq. ft) we need to make 43560/6=7260 swings.  Also let's assume we are taking 3 sec./swing.  Then 7260 swings x 3 sec/swing=21780 sec or 21780/3600sec/hr=6.05 hrs.  So to put your coil over an acre of ground with a modest swing rate takes about 6 hours excluding any digging, eating, or whatever.
      You could cut that time by swinging faster or using a bigger coil, but covering an acre takes a fairly long time.  You also could move faster and pass over ground between each swing, but your coil is still only seeing one acre.  Food for thought.
      Damn, I got to get a hobby.  
       
       
       
    • By Digger Bob
      We all know it, but how many of us actually do it?  I'm talking about asking your friends and total strangers about places to hunt.  Many old timers know about places that no one else does.  And they know other people who know places, and they know people, and so on.  Once you gain their trust and are honest and straightforward with them, all kinds of doors can be opened to you.
      Here is a perfect example;  It's actually a long story how this came about but suffice to say, this little piece came from an "estate" that her late husband had acquired many years before.  This, along with several antique tools, were bought for less than $50.  She had no use for them anymore and had no family members that were interested.
      I've looked online for similar items but haven't found anything this big or impressive out there.  There is a small label on the back that says "Anaconda mine".  No idea which one as there are at least three of them in the west.  In the direct sunlight the display of color is breathtaking!
       
       

    • By shredmandan
      Will be out in Littleton....Boulder area for 3 - 4 weeks. Would like to do some nugget shooting (maybe panning) while Im out there in Sept. Any areas anyone would suggest, in say a 50-100 miles of either place? Will have my Gold Bug Pro and pans. Never have done any nugget shooting been detecting for 50 plus years.
       
      Dan
    • By Sourdough Scott
      Saw a TV commercial this past memorial day weekend.  Had to do with mowing lawn. And thats what i was doing most of the weekend.  But my mind was definitely thinking about detecting for nuggets.  
      But is got me thinking about detecting. Last season was my most productive. I did quite well. I finally got some rewards for all of my efforts. 
      But while mowing and weedeating, thinking about how meticulous you have to be to make the yard look nice. Nice even rows while mowing. Even slow swings with the weedeater.
      In principle, the same as swinging a detector. But wanting to up my game this season,  I know I have room for improvement.  I've done lot'sof research this past winter. And got some leads that look promising, but will see if they pan out in the field. 
      I know my main thing I  want to improve on is hearing them faint signals. I feel I've been dismissing some as ground noise. I apologize for the rambling,  but had to get some of my thoughts down on print. 
      Hopefully the snowpack will be down this weekend for me to get to some of my areas. Wishing everyone on the forum great success this season. Scott K.
×
×
  • Create New...