Jump to content
Ridge Runner

What Detector Did You Buy In 2018 And Why?

Recommended Posts

I myself didn’t buy but just one detector and that was a Equinox 800 . 

I found it to be a great detector for coin hunting and that’s the reason I bought it . The first thing I done was print the owners manual full size for easy reading. I never found the Nox a problem to run . If you had the instruction manual and you could read plus understand you were good to go .

 The only trouble I did have was with the on and off switch. I’d had it having to wait on the 6” coil so I sold it . I told the guy about the switch when I sold it . He used it for a while but called Minelab and they fixed it . I guess it was in trouble from day one .

 Right now I’m just going to sit back and see what 2019 has to offer.

 Chuck 

PS Everyone who post here puts their name in for a hard cover book on Rocks and Minerals. I will ship free to anyone on this earth. You can post as much as you want but your name only goes in one time for the drawing This will end on November 16 at 6 PM CST

7161BB64-AFC0-4AC6-AD16-9F2E5F9116BD.jpeg

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought the Equinox because it obsoleted all my other machines.

I was already a Minelab fanboy, this is my 4th or 5th. This machine allowed me to consolidate into one platform, which is nice.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I got caught up in the up & coming release of the Equinox. Now history. I loved the whole concept & what Minelab were telling us that it could do.  It ticked a lot of boxes & seemed from the get go to be a very good at everything type detector. Not just great at one form of detecting & just ok at others, like gold prospecting. But great across the whole spectrum, & at a great price. For me being into the gold prospecting side of detecting I got the 800. It certainly hasn't disappointed in its small/tiny gold finding abilities, & that is with the 11" coil. Bring on the 6" &.....well.....that is just that bit more deadly again. I now await the delivery of the 15x12 coil. I also know that I will now more than likely get back into a bit of coin, relic & jewellery detecting knowing I have a very good detector in one for that form of detecting as well as gold prospecting. Along with the GPZ I am feeling pretty content with those two detectors. Knowing & feeling confident that I shouldn't miss too much out there. Cheers

JW :smile:    

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  I bought the Nox 800.  A good coin, relic and jewelry machine with a very good gold mode.  It will complement my SDC and my GPX 5000.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Crikey, don't get me started as its pretty much my detecting history as well as what detectors I bought.... being new to detecting and wanting to do Gold Prospecting I bought a lot, I started with a Garrett Euroace (Ace350) after the marketing said it finds gold nuggets, found out it was no good for nuggets as it only finds big ones which are near non-existent around here and a lot harder to find, upgraded it to a Nel Tornado coil as it finds sub-gram items according to it's marketing, now it see's larger bits of gold much easier and finds small bits very close to the coil, wanted something better than it, found it was no good for gold, bought a Go-Find 40, no idea why, lack of research on that one but wanted to replace the Garrett, found it was no good for gold and has the same ability as the Garrett with Tornado on small gold, but this part of the story was possibly the end of 2017. 

I read a lot about the T2 being a good gold machine in Africa, bought a T2 and found it was better than all above but with my lack of knowledge I bought a Mars Tiger coil for it and very popular combination in the UK, great coil for coins and covering ground but again not the best for gold, should have bought a smaller coil, it saw small bits of gold with good depths but I was reading smaller coils are better for gold than larger ones so I decided It was the wrong choice again... 

I then became active in this forum, bought two Gold Bug Pro's in Australia as I was confident I would be satisfied with them so one for me, one for the wife, found I was unable to find gold with them (not the Gold Bug's fault I didn't know what I was doing) but was blaming the Gold Bug Pro's, upgraded? their coils to Nel a Sharpshooter and Nel Snake, found they were doing quite well on small gold in testing but still found no gold so doubted the machines ability in the ground around here.  I Bought a 5" coil for my T2 on a trip to Australia, found it was similar in performance to the Gold Bug Pro's with that on but still found no gold.  I was now at hundreds of hours of swinging my detectors.... in all the wrong places with no gold.

Started reading the forum a lot more and found people were having good success with the Gold Monster 1000 so I had to have one, it wasn't long owning my GM1000 when I met KiwiJW as he kindly came to visit me while I was sluicing to say Hi.  I told him of my struggle to find a nugget a week or two later he offered to take me with my GM1000 to a creek I had been going to in the past to show me how to find a nugget, used my GM1000 and found 6 nuggets in a morning with his advice.  Loved my GM1000.   At this point I found it very hard to use my detectors and put down my sluice as I was constantly finding gold with my sluice and never with my detectors but started to find some gold myself with the GM1000.  

GM1000 is still my most successful machine.  Bought a Equinox 800 because I wanted a good all rounder and liked if it could match my GM1000 in gold ability with a waterproof design, it met all expectations and I'm very happy with it and have found gold with it, usually with JW's help.

Bought a GPX 4500 and Joey coil and started to find gold with it with JWs help again, then bought a 14X9 Evo coil for it and found gold with that too, now I'm finally satisfied, I have all the detectors I want and they do what I want well.  Sure I'd like a GPZ7000 but it's just not going to happen... not until the GPZ8000 comes out and the 7000 falls in price ?

So I think that sums up my detector purchases, I'm pretty sure all of that fell into 2018, if not close enough to it as I've only been detecting about a year.  I've since gone back and revisited a lot of my first detectors and found they're much better than I thought they were, especially the T2 and Gold Bug Pros.

Lesson to be learnt there kiddies, do your research "before" purchasing ? but don't rely on everything you read, I am sure you can find a webpage somewhere saying every product is perfect for your needs which is what happened to me.  If you look for it you will find it.  Better off coming to place like here where you get actual advice not "marketing".  Also, often it's not your equipment, it's your lack of knowledge causing you the grief.  If JW didn't come along I doubt I'd have a nugget yet.

I now mainly drive the Gold Bug Pros, GM1000, Equinox and GPX and my wife enjoys the T2 for occasional coin hunting and my daughter has been given the Euroace for coin hunting should she ever choose to join in, she didn't enjoy the lack of discrimination segments in the Go-Find which I originally gave her but it works great at the beach in and out of the water so shes still going to use it sometimes so no detector goes to waste.  I'm not a person who sells things ?

Sorry for the novel, it was good to vent :biggrin::wacko:

Just to clarify in case someone else new to detecting ever reads this, the T2, Gold Bug Pro, Gm1000, Equinox 800 and GPX are all good gold machines, I just didn't know what I was doing but research is still required as to the best for your situation.

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For me in 2018, the Explorer II and Equinox 600. 

The Etrac was my main machine at the time, used exclusively for coin hunting, and I'd always wanted to try the the Explorer II, a predecessor which some say goes a bit deeper with its stock coil and has better tones.  So, when the opportunity arose to buy one in excellent condition, I jumped on it.  I like having the Explorer II in my collection, but prefer the Etrac.

I'd been reading about the soon-to-come Equinox for some time, and wanted to try it, as it seemed to represent the latest wrinkle in Minelab's multi-frequency technology.  Supplies were almost non-existence at first, but I came across a place that had the Equinox 600.  Later, I also bought the 6" coil.  I am thinking of "upgrading" to an 800 for the gold modes, and that may be my next purchase.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Bought a Goldmonster and a GPX 5000.....

Sold the 5000 and keeping the Monster.  No fault pointed at the 5000 and I could see the potential but I got very spoiled using the Monster with it's simplicity, lightweight, discrimination, loud speaker (no headphone cords), etc.  5000 was (imo) a boat anchor, lousy disc, too many cords, and I was always getting hung up in the brush and having to readjust bungee going uphill or down.  I also spent a full hr once digging 2 targets (deep)….so that was it for this old tired lazy boy.....lol

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does the Minelab Pro-Find 35 pinpointer count?

Bought it to complement the Gold Monster I bought last year to speed up target recovery. Overall does a great job but tends to flip out at max power and keep beeping away until lowering the power or restarting it.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a GM 24K and a Falcon MD-20. Bought the 24K because of it's advantages over the GMT. I prefer White's detectors because they work, feel good in my hands, and their customer service. The Falcon MD-20 I bought because I wanted a detector that could see extremely small metals. Neither of my purchases has disappointed me. I'm in the process of building a slightly larger coil for the Falcon.

Jim

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By sandiwilliams717
      so all you guys know your Detector? Or so you thought maybe or maybe so you thought?


      So lots of you may be asking or have been asking or are curious about which Detector is better and probably assuming the 800 is way better and stronger than the 600. Or which is better for the beginner? The Minelab Equinox 600 or 800? What Detector is more powerful? Therefore producing more finds and at better quality? Or are they in a nutshell the exact same Detector besides A extra mode ( Gold ), and 20 and 40 khz are available to be single frequencies on the Equinox 800 and not the 600. Does The Equinox 600 have 20 and 40 khz in multi frequency? And the 800 has more adjustable tone pitches in more tone brackets and recovery speed is more adjustable and iron bias as well. But are as I said in a nutshell are the same exact animal. Truly deep, capable of all types of metal detecting adventures, fully submersible and the actually find amazing finds. Whatever you buy make sure it's a Minelab Equinox. They produce. Just don't go about it like I did and dying to set up most advanced settings and trying to copy someone's program. Let that metal detector talk to you and you'll create a bond with it and only tweak it when you feel the need to be able to comprehend it better. It's preset modes are incredible and this detector is truly worth every penny.... Thanks for listening guys
    • By Steve Herschbach
      Which metal detectors have the most reliable target ID numbers?
      Target ID is a function of depth - the deeper the target, the more difficult it is to get a clean target ID as the ground signal interferes. Other items directly adjacent to the desired target can also cause inaccurate numbers. The more conductive the item, the higher the resulting ID number, but also the larger the item the higher the number. Silver is more conductive than gold, so a gold item will give a lower number than the same size silver item. But a very large gold item can give a higher number than a small silver item, so numbers do not identify types of metal. Gold and aluminum read the same and vary in size so to dig one you dig the other. Only mass produced items like coins produce numbers that are more or less the same over the years but a zinc penny will read lower than a copper penny due to the change in composition.
      In general iron or ferrous targets produce negative numbers or low numbers. Aluminum, gold, and US nickels produce mid-range numbers. And most other US coins produce high numbers. Other countries coins, like Canadian coins with ferrous content, can read all over the place.
      The scale applied varies according to manufacturer so the number produced by each detector will vary according to the scale used. The 0-100 range for non-ferrous targets is most common but there are others. Minelab employs a dual number system on a 2D scale with thousands of possible numbers, but they are now normalizing the results produced to conform more closely to the linear scale used by other manufacturers.

      White's Visual Discrimination Identification (VDI) Scale
      Increasing ground mineralization has a huge effect on the ability to get a good target ID. Ground mineralization is nearly always from iron mineralization, and this tends to make weak targets, whether very small targets or very deep targets, misidentify. The target numbers get dragged lower, and many non-ferrous targets will eventually be identified as iron if buried deep enough. Small non-ferrous readings and iron readings actually overlap. That is why any discrimination at all is particularly risky for gold nugget hunters.
      If you want target ID numbers to settle down, lower sensitivity and practice consistent coil control. The target number will often vary depending on how well the target is centered and how fast the coil moves.
      Higher sensitivity settings lead to jumpier numbers as the detectors become less stable at higher levels. The interference from the ground signal increases and interference from outside electrical sources also increases, leading to less stable numbers.
      Higher frequency detectors are inherently more sensitive and are jumpier. So lean lower frequency for more solid results. Multi frequency detectors act like low frequency detectors and tend to have more solid target numbers due to the ability to analyze a target with different frequencies.
      Another issue is the number of target categories, or ID segments, or VDIs, or notches, or bins (all names for the same thing) that a detector offers.
      For instance here are the number of possible target id categories or segments each detector below offers:
      Fisher CZ-3D = 7
      Garrett Ace 250 = 12
      Minelab X-Terra 305 = 12
      Minelab X-Terra 505 = 19
      Minelab X-Terra 705 = 28
      Minelab Equinox = 50
      Fisher F75 (and many other models) = 99
      White's MXT (and many other models) = 190
      Minelab CTX 3030 = 1750
      Fewer target categories means more possible items get lumped together under a single reading, but that the reading is more stable. Many detectors will tell you the difference between a dime and a quarter. The Fisher CZ assumes you want to dig both so puts them under one segment along with most other coins.
      People who use detectors with many target numbers usually just watch the numbers jump around and mentally average the results. Some high end detectors can actually do this averaging for you! But I think there is something to be said for owning a detector that simplifies things and offers less possible numbers to start with. The old Fisher CZ method still appeals to me, especially for coin detecting. So do detectors like the Garrett Ace 250 or Minelab X-Terra 505 for the same reason.
      The problem is that as people strive to dig deeper targets or smaller targets the numbers will always get less reliable. But if you want to have a quiet performing metal detecting with solid, reliable target numbers look more for coin type detectors running at lower frequencies under 10 kHz or at multiple frequencies and possibly consider getting a detector with fewer possible target segments. And with any detector no matter what just back that sensitivity setting off and you will get more reliable target numbers.
      ads by Amazon...
      Detectors often use tones to identify targets and often use far fewer tones than indicated by the possible visual target id numbers. The X-Terra 705 for instance can use 28 tones, one for each segment. However, most people find this too busy, and so simple tone schemes of two, three, or four tones may be selected. I think it is instructive that many people often end up ignoring screen readings and hunting by ear, using just a few tones. This ends up just being an ultra basic target id system much like the simpler units offer. Reality is that most people do not need or care about huge numbers of target numbers. For many just three ranges suffice, low tone for iron, mid tone for most gold items, and high tone for most US coins. The meter could do the same thing, but for marketing purposes more is better and so we get sold on detectors with hundreds of possible target ID numbers. Perhaps this is a digital representation of an old analog meter with its nearly infinite range of response but the reality is we do not need that level of differentiation to make a simple dig or no dig decision.
      Finally, a picture often says it all. Below we have a shot of the White's M6 meter. I like it because the decal below illustrates a lot. You see the possible numerical range of -95 to 95 laid out in the middle. Over it is the simplified iron/gold/silver range. Note the slants where they overlap to indicate the readings really do overlap. Then you get the probable target icons. -95 is noted as "hot rock" because many do read there.

      The M6 can generate 7 tones depending on the target category. I have added red lines to the image to show where these tones sit in relation to the scale. It breaks down as follows:
      -95 = 57 Hz (Very Low) Hot Rock
      -94 to -6 = 128 Hz (Low) Iron Junk
      -5 to 7 = 145 Hz (Med Low) Gold Earrings, Chains - Foil
      8 to 26 = 182 Hz (Medium) Women's Gold Rings/Nickel - Small Pull Tabs
      27 to 49 = 259 Hz (Med Hi) Men's Gold Rings - Large Pull Tabs
      50 to 70 = 411 Hz (High) Zinc Penny/Indian Head Penny - Screw Caps
      71 to 95 = 900 Hz (Very High) Copper Penny/Dime/Quarter/Dollar
      Note that the screen reading of +14 is noted as being a nickel or ring but it can also be the "beaver tail" part of an aluminum pull tab or the aluminum ring that holds an eraser on a pencil, among other things.
      The best book ever written on the subject of discrimination is "Taking A Closer Look At Metal Detector Discrimination" by Robert C. Brockett. It is out of print but if you find a copy grab it, assuming the topic interests you.
      Always remember - when in doubt, dig it out! Your eyes are the best target ID method available.


    • By karelian
      The passing of a friend unfortunately has led to me taking ownership of a modified Tdi Pro. My machine is mounted on an Anderson shaft and is factory spec. My old mate had his machine modified to smooth out the threshold and to add some sensitivity. The specifics related to the modifications are not known by me, other than that they were conducted by 'Luke'..Oz Digger.. This happened some time ago. So the modified machine is probably not a keeper, I don't want two Tdi Pro machines.. The opportunity to do a comparison cannot and should not be ignored. 
      My intention is to focus on small gold performance, the threshold smoothness, the ability to use gain, basic performance and handling characteristics  under different circumstances. The machines will use the same fully charged battery pack, same coil, same targets, same test location and conditions on the same day etc. Trying to minimise external variations. I'll start with the usual useless air test. Later I'll follow up with in ground testing on the actual goldfields in mineralized soil. Test coils will be with a small coil and a large coil. Targets will be gold only. The 1 grain ingot, the half gram gold coin, a half sovereign gold coin. Some real small sub gram nuggets to see how small we can go.. There is a process involved so I'll take my time and do it right.  Any specific questions or suggestions, speak now or forever hold you peace.. I'm only doing this once. Once it sold it will be too late to revisit.. 
      All the best.

    • By Steve Herschbach
      Update January 2019 - I started reviewing detectors on the internet over twenty years ago. At the time it seemed I was providing a service since good information was hard to find. I enjoyed reviewing machines in detail for those who were interested. The internet was more friendly back in those days.
      Times have changed, and these days everyone with a video camera is a metal detector expert. In particular there is a trend where industry insiders like me are considered tainted sources of information, not to be trusted. Personally, I don’t need people questioning my integrity. I was doing this for fun and that sucked all the fun out of it. I am therefore no longer accepting invitations to review metal detecting equipment. I may continue to work with engineers on product development but in general will recuse myself from publicly discussing the equipment involved. If anyone wants to use me as part of their marketing efforts they can hire me outright. I'm available and will consider job offers that involve the sales and marketing of metal detectors.
      My thanks to those of you who have expressed your appreciation for my efforts over the years. You can find my collected detector reports here. The focus on this website going forward will be individual user reviews as part of the new Metal Detector Database with User Reviews. Check it out! 

       
    • By Tnsharpshooter
      Another hunt with Tarsacci today.  Found some relics mostly musket balls.  First target of the day located with Tarsacci I did head head to head with XP Deus wearing 9” Hf coil.
      Only head to head done today.
      You will hear in this video where I actually had Deus ground balanced using 14 kHz.  A 72 was in phase window.  I disn’t  do another GB when switching to 28.8khz.  As I had no clean place close to do.  In my ground if I would have done GB at 28.8khz what I usually see is a phase reading 3 points below what pumping GB shows for 14 KHz.  So imo the GB being off a mere 3 points approx didn’t have anything to do with Deus struggling to get targett from the one direction using 28 kHz (especially after seeing depth of target recovered).  Both Tarsacci and Deus Hf coils here are 9” wide but Tarsacci Coil is longer.  Tarsacci is no slouch in iron.
      This object found checked with magnet and is totally nonferrous.
      Will post a pic of closeup.


    • By Tnsharpshooter
      Two videos.
      I have used the term iron range when talking of Etrac here loosely.  I recommend folks wanting more info if necessary to refer to Etrac User’s Manual and look closely at factory relic program to get a better idea of where ferrous reports in relation to the conductive line perspective wise.
      Etrac was run in videos at 50 conductive tones,
      Tarsacci sensitivty setting at level 6.
      All detectors balanced to actual ground except Etrac, but swept Etrac a little beforehand to insure ground tracking was good.
      Most of these targets are I think challenged in one fashion or another.
      Enjoy
       
×
×
  • Create New...