Jump to content
mn90403

Care To Share Your 7000 Settings?

Recommended Posts

Wow!  What a way to revive an old thread.

Thanks Gerry.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are some settings I was given in Australia.  I got these from the Coiltek Centre near the end of my trip.  It found the targets buried on the test garden with ease.

I used something very close to this for most of my trip.  They are similar to Lunk's settings.  It kept the detector nice and smooth but I guess I could have put up with a little more chatter.  I was interested in big.

 

 

IMG_20190523_210204.jpg

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think with reading some of JP's comments and threads I would use the semi-auto with the above settings rather than just auto.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/14/2019 at 10:04 AM, mn90403 said:

I think with reading some of JP's comments and threads I would use the semi-auto with the above settings rather than just auto.

Here is how I look at the GPZ-7000 and proper settings.  I have 4 very educated and highly Successful Expert Field Staff members who are accomplished nugget hunters & all find more gold than most owners of the machine, including myself, that makes 5 of us.  Each of us find plenty of gold and do better than most....but we all have a little difference in our Settings.  Which one is right?  Lunk has the most bass-ackwards Settings of any of my staff, but he finds the most pieces.  Spencer seems to find more deeper and larger nuggets than the others of us.  I try to split the difference and go for a "Happy Medium". 

JP's Settings are what gives him confidence and Success is Australia and I would never try to say he is wrong.  His success is proven and he does it for a living.

There is no 1 Setting that is the best for all kind of gold at all depths and all soils.

I'll try JP's settings this fall at Rye Patch and if I feel it gives me an advantage...then you'll certainly see me change.  But it will take much time to test over many undug nuggets of different sizes at different depths and soils to see if there is in fact a better or worse outcome.

Either way, this thread adds flavor, opinions and options for us all to try.

Good luck out there.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By phrunt
      I always wondered if there was even gold around where the X-coil manufacturer lives, I didn't know much about Russian gold or if Russia even had much gold.
      Here is a video broken into parts of the Russian manufacturer showing the different capabilities of the 17x12" X-Coil between the Standard GPZ14” Minelab coil being used near high voltage power lines in Russia.
      It's good to see he is a prospector.
      Sorry about the quality of some of the parts. 
      It's a deep hole he has to dig to get it, nice soft soil though... that'd make life easier than using a jackhammer 🙂
       
    • By Emmanuel
      Hello fellow prospectors,
      I recently acquired a Minelab GPZ 7000 and I am looking for a fellow prospector wanting to search for gold with me in Southern California. As a former FBI agent, I have learned it is better to have two people when exploring unknown places... I have been using a Minelab CTX 3030 and I am ready for something new i.e. gold prospecting. I live in Long Beach but  I also have a home in the Lake Arrowhead area (San Bernardino County). I believe some areas are worth prospecting in San Bernardino County. Having said that, I am willing to travel. Reach out if you are interested. ads4350@gmail.com
    • By jasong
      I was going to post this in one of the X Coil threads, but it might be of interest to everyone.
      I bought a replacement ferrite ring since I left my ML ferrite in Arizona. It's one of the Doc's ferrites with the white backside (off Ebay), I did not realize they were not ML ferrites when I bought it. The OEM Minelab ferrites have a black backside.
      It would not balance on the X Coils at all and actually sounded like a screaming target (I didn't try the Z14) so I reported that to the coil manufacturer. He responded that the white backed aftermarket rings are not the same as the ML rings. So, as I normally do, I checked for myself, bought an authentic ML ring, and he was right.
      They are the same size, but the Doc's ring is 10 grams heavier (something I noticed immediately but did not have a ML ring to compare to until recently). It is also more magnetic. The Doc's ring is also conductive whereas the ML ring is non-conductive - the Doc's ring was reading about 38 ohms from side to side whereas the ML ring read infinity. And after I sanded the backs to get a fresh surface to check resistances on I noticed the ML ring looks dull and black as a ferrite should, but the Doc's ring looks shiny and metallic, like iron.
      So, clearly there are differences between the two rings. Thought people might like to know even if you are just using the stock coil, as I'm not sure how this affects the ground balance, but someone could be running suboptimally using this ring.

    • By Jin
      I often see others using a high sensitivity setting of 16 - 20 on the 7000. Is there really much of an advantage doing this? I used to think maxing out my 4500 gave me some kind of advantage over the poor suckers who ran factory presets or slightly higher, now im not so convinced. 
      Today i tested out my new 10" and 20" X-coils and tried many different combinations of settings to see what would suite me best. I did most of my testing with the 20" coil on a 2 gram bit of gold. I dug a skinny trench 200mm (nearly 8 inches) in some reasonably hot ground and placed my 2 gram bit in the bottom. High yield/Difficult were the better settings. (Ferrite and ground balanced, Semi auto ground balance,  Ground/audio smoothing off,  volume 8 (using a booster),  threshold 27,  threshold pitch 63,  volume limit 7)
      First i tried a high sensitivity and the target signal popped out nice and loud. Then I started detecting the surrounding area and felt there was so much other ground noises going on that the quieter signals may be masked. Eventually I found my sweet spot where the detector was quiet as a mouse and i had no problems hearing a slight change in the threshold no matter how small it was. This was at a sensitivity of only 3.
      I then went back over the 2 gram bit and it still gave a great response using sensitivity of 3 (although slightly less than when the sensitivity was a lot higher).
      When i started detecting and raising the sensitivity up around 6 -8 a lot more ground noise came in. Now im used to ground noise as i used to use my gpx in Normal timings most of the time. But after reading how the zed is a different beast and not to drive it to hard i decided to try less aggressive settings to see if less is infact more. Obviously im new to the zed and have much to learn so will continue trying different things until i get my head around things. 
        
    • By phrunt
      Here is a recent video of a couple of dudes testing out their massive range of Nugget Finder coils against the GPZ 7000 on targets they've dug into the ground in Western Australia's red dirt.  I found it quite an interesting video and shows how close a lot of coils are in performance.
      I notice he doesn't appear to scrub the GPZ on the ground as much as the others, not sure the reason for that, maybe he doesn't want to damage such an expensive coil ?
      By the time he's got to the GPZ all the ground scrubbing has probably made it a shallower target.
    • By Rob Allison
      Hello All,
         Out here in Arizona, USA, it's been very hot and now humid as the Monsoons are right around the corner.  That being said, I have been poking around an old placer location loaded with iron rubbish in search for overlooked gold nuggets.  I have made it a point to start very early, right at day break and hunt until the heat runs me out (typically 4-5 hours).  I was using the Minelab GPZ 7000 and placering a wash bottom down to bedrock like the old-timers would.  I'm lucky every so often to get a nugget here and there wedged in the bedrock cracks/crevices that the old-timers missed or overlooked.  It's always a mystery to wonder what the old-timers really discovered in some of these really rich coarse gold placer areas.  

      I'm not sure of the rules about Youtube videos, but I have attached two of them for your viewing.  Hope some of you that are not able to get out right now can enjoy the adventure with me.
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...