Jump to content
vive equinox

Proof That Multi Iq Obsolete Other Single Freq Vlf ! In An Easy Test !

Recommended Posts

Hello , 

It would be great if the youtubers like calabash and others  who have lot of followers make a video of that to share at maximum .

- Take 12-15 differents coins of your country ( the coins you use all the day ) 

-Make a pile (heap ?) with that coins ,like a little tower 

-Keep this pile beetween your thumb and other finger .

-Swing that in front of the coil , at 3-4 inches , the side of the coins ! 

-Now try that with all the detect mode , not need to change factory presets ( maybe only the accept to 0,1,2 in field 2 ) , you are free to try differents settings later .

-The only and important setting for the moment is to change frequency , try 5,10,15,20,40 and multi in each detect mode . Of course multi in the two beach and 20,40,mutli in gold .

What is happening ?:smile:

I know the results , but i want to know the result of the coins of USA,England, australia ,canada .... So please share your results in comments or video

Make that with different detectors , if you have impact or deus or other who have various frequency , try to switch all frequency . 

You can try that with HF white coil if you have , but ....

 

The conclusion is multi IQ obsolete the others single freq .   It is more or less to say what calabash said in his video .

 

We can debate of that .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I know one thing for sure. The sign of a successful advertising campaign is how long people talk about it. The obsolete thing was intentially provocative for this reason. Many people do not really understand the meaning of the word obsolete, which has helped. The fact that a half a year later people are still discussing the ad would make it an extremely successful ad, no matter what people think of the subject matter. Ironically every time somebody complains about the ad they are actually doing the advertisers bidding! :laugh:

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm used to the word "obsolete" being thrown around as a complete all things tech nut. In tech parlance it can carry different connotations. It's most often used by users themselves rather than the actual tech companies. It seems to automatically follow from a statement by Apple for example that they will no longer support or issue updates for a certain product or platform. The end user, following the lead of tech bloggers, then calls the product or platform obsolete and it is then avoided like a plague but for some stubborn old timers and cult followers. Minelab was I'm sure very aware of the connotations of their chosen verbiage and how people would run away with it, because as I alluded to, you generally don't hear that word from a company directly, so it hits harder when you do. I understood immediately what it would have to mean for their purposes though. That they had packed into one machine what it would take several single frequency machines to accomplish. General use single frequency machines can no longer stand on their own as proximate competition to their new models. And that is what it has meant in the tech sector too in reality. That the gap in ability has so widened between the new innovative product and the old that disposable capital being equal, no reasonable person would choose the older "outdated" or "obsolete" products, though they will still work at a base level. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with Steve on the advertising and marketing smarts at Minelab. No, the Equinox does not "obsolete" every other metal detector. It does however, offer detectorist's something we have wanted since forever - an Affordable, Waterproof, lightweight, All-Around land and sea, metal detector.

It will eventually kill expensive single-frequency machines, like digital photography killed one-hour-photo shops. Other manufacturers will either catch up, or relegate themselves to making $200.00-$500.00 machines. Would YOU buy a Multi-Kruzer, or a Equinox 600?:ph34r:

IMG_0485.jpg

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/12/2018 at 11:18 PM, Terry Soloman said:

. . .

Would YOU buy a Multi-Kruzer, or a Equinox 600?:ph34r:

. . .

I have the Equinox 600 and would not trade it for the Multi-Kruzer, given my favorable experience with the Nox.  But I have not used the Kruzer and would like to hear more about how the Multi-Kruzer does up against the Nox.  Price and feature-wise, they are both targeted to the same niche and if any machine gives the Nox real competition in that market segment it will probably be the Kruzer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎05‎/‎04‎/‎2018 at 9:32 AM, vive equinox said:

The conclusion is multi IQ obsolete the others single freq .   It is more or less to say what calabash said in his video .

We can debate of that .

It has been pointed out many times that the word obsolete is nothing more that a marketing ploy and so many people keep spouting it as if it is something special, It is Not !.

Any of the top of the range single frequency machines from the last 10 or 15 year can do just as much as the newer models and in fact some of them have a head start due to the amount of accessory coils that are available, And when it comes to beach detecting nothing on the market to date is going to compete with BBS and FBS machines unless a person uses a PI machine at the cost of discrimination,

The VLF market is being flooded with many different flavours and all the hype about EQ being the all seeing eye has fallen short, The fact is It is a damn good detector but the depth abilities are very much the norm, Where the EQ does excel is it gets the novice up and running as soon as he/she opens the box, We will not see any major improvements in the VLF world until someone makes a VLF version of the GPZ-7000, regardless of what VLF's come out we are just treading water until that VLF-7000 becomes a reality.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Here's two new videos by Calabash Digger that show where the Deus has a leg-up over the Equinox in his type of hunting.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, like I said it's a great machine but they all have their weak points and vice versa.

Good video, thanks for posting.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not used the Equinox but I can tell you I am nothing but impressed with the Mult-Kruzer Is it making my single frequency detectors obsolete? absolutely not!

 

 I started to watch the video below and the first thing I seen was a nail board. I'm not bashing anyone, I'm not judging anyone but I personally take nothing from any video comparing detectors air testing on a board. I have proven to myself with several detectors over many years that the information provided by air testing on a board is not a good indication of how a detector will react to targets that have been in the ground for a long period.

47 minutes ago, Maine_Capt said:

 

Here's two new videos by Calabash Digger that show where the Deus has a leg-up over the Equinox in his type of hunting.

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree but it is not really an air test because the items are on the ground so the machine would take that in to account, It is more of a surface test "ground enabled " I know of quite a few machines that will pick out the targets doing that test, The real problems start when the targets get past a certain depth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By oldmancoyote1
      While experimenting with my Gold Racer, I think I saw more stable VIDs by raising the coil and scanning perpendicular to magnetic north. There seemed to be a height that was most stable, and scanning perpendicular to magnetic north tended to eliminate oscillation between very low and very high values.  It wasn't perfect, but it was suggestive.  I'm wondering if anyone else has anything to offer about this.
    • By calabash digger
      Hope this video helps someone with their next detector purchase..
       
    • By Mxt Sniper
      I wonder if Minelab will build a dedicated nugget detector in the style of the equinox, but with gpz type technology. This seems to be the way the CZX by Fisher is headed. I think the Equinox will open up many more machines in the same style eventually. I would hope for concentric and dd coils and more power in a lightweight dedicated nugget hunting package.
    • By Steve Herschbach
      A nice summary quote from Tom Dankowski about why Simultaneous Multi Frequency (SMF) is worth consideration over single frequency options...
      “SMF's punch through bad dirt better. Hold on to accurate ID's at depth....and in bad dirt....better. Handle EMI better. Genuinely handle wet-salt better..... to include more accurate ID at depth.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., and a host of other rationale/justifications.”
      Fisher Intelligence (5th Edition) by Thomas J. Dankowski
    • By Steve Herschbach
      First Texas (Bounty Hunter, Fisher, Teknetics) - last new models Fisher F75+ and Teknetics T2+. Next up a new pulse induction (PI) beach detector. A new digital multifrequency to replace the Fisher CZ3D is long overdue but at this rate we will be lucky to just see the PI before the end of the year.

      Garrett - last new model the AT Max. Hard to believe the flagship GTI 2500 has been around since 1999 with no updates. Garrett so far has shown no interest in multifrequency. The most I was hoping for was a lightweight dry land version of the ATX, but so far no sign of that happening either. I doubt we will see anything else from Garrett this year but they could surprise.
      Makro - last new models the Multi Kruzer and Gold Kruzer. Makro has mastered single frequency so everyone would like to see what they can do with multifrequency or pulse induction. I expect Makro is done with new models for the year.
      Minelab - last new models Equinox 600 and 800. I have no idea what’s up next for detectors but I sure would like to see that small coil for my GPZ 7000. I really don’t expect anything new for the rest of the year besides Equinox accessories.
      Nokta - sister company to Makro. Last new detector the Nokta Impact. Up next the Nokta Anfibio.
      Tesoro - Who? What?
      White’s - last new models the MX7 and TDI SL Special Edition plus the just announced Goldmaster 24K. Hopefully that new tech will eventually see the light. Right now just getting the 24K out the door is job one.
      XP - last new products the HF coils for the Deus, with X35 coils and XP Orx due by end of year.
    • By Steve Herschbach
      When I saw a video showing the Makro Gold Racer recovery speed using two nails and a gold ring, it caused me to reflect on the various internet nail tests. Nearly all employ modern round nails, when these items rarely present issues.
      The common VDI (visual discrimination scale) puts ferrous items at the low end of the scale, and items with progressively increasing conductivity higher on the scale. The problem is the size of items also matters. Small gold is low on the scale, and the larger the gold, the higher it reads on the scale. A silver quarter reads higher than a silver dime, etc.
      All manner of ferrous trash including medium and smaller nails fall where they should when using discrimination and are easily tuned out. The problem is large iron and steel items, and ferrous but non-magnetic materials like stainless steel. Steel plates, large bolts, broken large square nails, axe heads, hammer heads, broken pry bar and pick tips, etc. all tend to read as high conductive targets. Usually it is just the sheer size pushing it higher up the scale.
      Detectors also love things with holes, which makes for a perfect target by enabling and enhancing near perfect eddy currents, making items appear larger than they really are. Steel washers and nuts are a big problem in this regard, often reading as non-ferrous targets.
      Oddball shapes cause problems, particularly in flat sheet steel. Old rusted cans often separate into irregular shaped flat pieces, and roofing tin (plated steel) and other sheet steel items are my number one nemesis around old camp sites. Bottle caps present a similar issue in modern areas. These items produce complex "sparky" eddy currents with both ferrous and non-ferrous indications. Many thin flat steel items produce remarkably good gold nugget type signals in old camp areas.
      Two general tips. Concentric coils often handle ferrous trash better than DD coils. A DD coil is often the culprit when dealing with bottle caps where a concentric coil often makes them easy to identify. Another thing is to use full tones. Many ferrous items are producing both ferrous and non-ferrous tones. Blocking ferrous tones allows only the non-ferrous tone to be heard, giving a clear "dig me" signal. This was the real bane of single tone machines with a simple disc knob to eliminate ferrous objects. You still heard the non-ferrous portion of the signal. Multi tones allows you to hear the dual ferrous/non-ferrous reports from these troublesome items, helping eliminate most of them.
      Certain detectors can also show multiple target responses on screen at once, like the White's models featuring the SignaGraph (XLT, DFX, etc.) and CTX with target trace. These displays show target "smearing" that stands out differently from the clean VDI responses produced by most good items. A machine with a simple VDI numeric readout can only show you one number at a time and the only indication you might get is "dancing" numbers that refuse to lock on. Usually though the predominate response overrides and fakes you out. This is where a good high end visual display capable of putting all VDI response on screen simultaneously can really help out.
      I have been collecting these odd iron and steel items to practice with and to help me evaluate which machines might do best in ferrous trash. The main thing I wanted to note here is contrived internet videos with common round nails often present a misleading picture. Many machines do very well on nails yet fail miserably on flat steel.


×