groundscanner Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 Xirgix, Which mode is the top image? Park 1? Thanks!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xergix Posted January 3, 2019 Share Posted January 3, 2019 51 minutes ago, groundscanner said: Xirgix, Which mode is the top image? Park 1? Thanks!! Yes, but also park 2 , field and gold have the same graphic, only beach are different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Gillespie Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 I ran a few test tonight and here is a captured picture of my Equinox in multi-frequency mode. I couldn't get my capture to go higher than 20, but that is my computer hardware problems not the Equinox. I also did single frequency captures and all look good but frequency 5, but here again I'm not sure I've got everything set correctly. Stay tuned Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xergix Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 I think it is an error to try to visualize the frequencies with a spectrum analyzer, it is better an oscilloscope, the output signal from Equinox is a square wave, the square waves are rich in harmonics, this generates a confusion in the signal display. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EL NINO77 Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 With the optimal VA setting: f1.7.5 Equinox 800 Park 01 program ,Pic1 Equinox 800 Park 02 program ,Pic2 Equinox 800 Beach1 program Pic3 Whites Spectra V3 -3F multi,Pic4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Gillespie Posted January 16, 2019 Share Posted January 16, 2019 I'm actually in this to satisfy my on curiosity. Not trying to prove or disprove anyone. And certainly not to discredit other, in any way. This software also has the capability to output like an oscilloscope. I'll tinker more in the coming days. Thanks for the message EL NINO77, I'll see if I can make those adjustments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cptbill Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 Technology be as it may I love my equinox 800, works for me!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dubious Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 Using a dynamic microphone as the coupler is an interesting idea and looks like it works; but a simple coil of larger diameter (essentially, half of the microphone on a larger scale), coupled loosely, might give better results. I believe Geotech (senior engineer who has designed detectors) said he created his own magnetic coupler to use in reading the Nox's output, but I don't know if he described it in more detail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EL NINO77 Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 I used the measurement probe as a finished product - a small external ferrite antenna with a Jack 3.5mm jack. from Tecsun PL 365 radio receiver. Desing... It s a coil ..whit ferrite core.... Program Gold1-multi: Program Gold2 multi : program Gold2 - 1f-20 kHz : Program Gold2 -1f-40-kHz : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Gillespie Posted January 17, 2019 Share Posted January 17, 2019 Even though its been stated that using the Frequency Spectrum to see the frequency, is an error, I'm seeing the same results as EL NINO77. I'm seeing a Visual representation of the frequency that is dominant, where his (much better) is both a visual output and a numerical frequency HZ. I need to see if I can make my program replicate what EL NINO77 has posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now