Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Back in the 4000 days and older gent named Bogene (in his 70's I believe) came up with a method of detecting that is basically turning the threshold off, screwing the gain and stabiliser up, and detecting like that. I've had a dabble with these settings but could never get my head around the no threshold part as it just sounds so damn wrong after being used to threshold since Jesus played fullback for Jerusalem.

Yesterday we were detecting and old spot and it was noisy. I turned the audio smoothing to low on a few occassions, but don't really like the dullness it gives so went back to the off position, and played with the tuning on several occassions to make a smoother threshold. I had 9 little nuggets in an area I've had the SDC on recently and eventually decided it was a perfect time to try Bogene's setting on the GPZ. I started with High Yield and Difficult, threshold to 1, gain to 20, audio on 8 and scored one of the smallest bits I've ever found.

I showed my mate and that was my first Bogene nugget. I tried normal but the ground wasn't that forgiving so eventually settled on threshold at 7, High Yield, Difficult, gain at 20 and audio at 8, and commenced to get another 14 bits. The detector is pretty much dead quiet, except for a very faint hum through the B&Z booster, and the signals are more like a mouse squeaking until you get the coil directly over the target. i found that on the faint ones, a large hole started got the coil closer and the target easier to find.

On one signal we were digging I put the coil away from the hole on the ground and it squeaked. I scuffed the ground and moved the coil. That was the next target and next nugget. I would have thought that the coil would have to be over a target to get them, but brushing past some rocks and grass tufts produced a single squeak at times and some moving around of the coil produced an obvious target. I also found while experimenting that the 27 and 28 numbers I was running the threshold at are not the best for small nuggets and 26 seems to be ideal. 25 is where the threshold is in and out, but 26 seems to be the goods.

I'm certainly not going to be using this method as my preferred setting, but it makes me wonder whether it might be an advantage on areas that people are having to run high smoothing on, so maybe someone who is having this difficulty might be able to try it out.

BTW there is a picture of the nuggets for the day on my Facebook page at http://www.facebook.com/GoldCityDetecting?ref=hl

Cheers.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Peter, i saw your post on FB and was interested to read about Bogene's settings being used on the 7000, thanks for the great report and write up on your experiences, i will be giving it a try for sure if the time/place comes about.

 

Darren

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice video. I've been running the audio smoothing on "Low" here in southern Arizona but I think this weekend I'll try "Off" and see how smooth the GPZ still is after that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mn,

I try and run in Normal if at all possible, but usually Difficult is the soil choice I use. The mode depends on the sort of gold and the depth, but High Yield is usually the choice as it is very responsive to small bits, but if there were bigger deeper bits around General is my preference.

When we were detecting a spot recently using Normal/High Yield, I had a signal that sounded a lot like a ground noise as that area is hot (a Goldbug will not ground balance there) but is reasonably uniform except for some claydome signals. Switching to Difficult/High Yield lost it completely which made me think it was a ground noise. On digging it later, I got a response in Difficult/High Yield after a few inches of dirt was removed and by then Normal was telling me it was a nugget. The result was an 8 grammer from 18".

 

JP,

I've watched that several times and the target gets lost in High smoothing at times. You'd really need to be on your game if high was selected and you walked over that as i'd reckon it would be missed. My thoughts are that Bogene's settings are probably a better option if it is very noisy, rather than use High smoothing, but one needs to be more aware of coil overlap so as not to miss targets. Smoothing to me sounds like the detector is dulled down quite a bit and after running it off, suddenly using smoothing just doesn't sound right. I have done some comparisons on a small nugget up close and High smoothing actually gave a better and more obvious response than either low or off, but deeper bits as the video shows, suffer. If I was detecting for small shallow bits in a slightly noisy environment, then I wouldn't be worried about using either of the 3 smoothing options, but for deeper bits, OFF is the choice.

 

Cheers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting this Bogene method it goes against the "traditional" always a threshold but there you are, certainly will have a shot at it, plus your observation re. high smoothing on small stuff, have a shallow broken down reef that I believe I`ve taken all detectable gold off last weekend that`s just waiting for these methods. To date never used high smoothing alternate between off and low, depending on ground noise & depth? Your obviously having a ball with the GPZ, tis a gold magnet for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the grounds I am in (NV and AZ) It is almost always more sensitive (and quieter) in the end to stay in Normal by lowering the threshold and go into low smoothing than it is to switch into Difficult. I'm a huge fan of running the threshold lower than normal even for every day detecting, I keep thold around 10-15 and keep my sensitivity around 16-18. I read a lot in the beginning that the sens on the GPZ doesn't make as much difference as it did on the GPX but I've found that generally to not be true, the difference between 10 and 18 is huge especially on the smaller and deeper stuff and just like running in Normal mode I will do what it takes to be able to run higher sensitivity whenever possible.

High smoothing and a low threshold helps with the salt too, it makes it detectable when it gets real bad and water saturated. Also cuts into a lot of the lightning, which is sometimes worse than the salt to deal with. What I miss by culling the audio is, in my experience, far less than what I miss because of the cacaphony of sounds due to ground and lightning when you get into those conditions and don't use the audio processing.

And oddity, I haven't gotten it on camera yet, but I've found that maybe 5% of nuggets are actually louder on Difficult than Normal. Has anyone else noticed this? Sometimes I think it has to do with the bad ground and Difficult just cuts through it all better. But I've actually found nuggets that I couldn't hear on Normal in the ground, and even after digging them and putting them right on the surface they were still a markedly less intense signal in Normal than in Difficult which must be due to geometry? All of them were small, maybe 2-5 grains-ish. All were in heavy salt ground too which maybe has something to do with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone actually had better luck finding "larger, deeper targets" running in General or Deep?

I seem to lose sensitivity in either mode compared to High Yield so I don't bother with them but now I'm questioning myself because I hunt in an area that's yielded some large, deep targets. General and Deep just seem like different sensitivity settings to battle ground mineralization. Are the two different timings actually worth using for deep stuff or are they just to be used in places like Australia where the mineralization is bad enough to make you give up with other detectors?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Key statements in the following video. High Yield is best on one ounce and smaller nuggets. General is better on nuggets weighing several ounces or more. Quite a gray area in the middle! Bottom line is I hunt in High Yield and I will let the multi ounce nuggets take care of themselves. I am pretty confidant I will hit them anyway. But if I was targeting a more mineralized area specifically looking for deeper, larger nuggets, I would run in general.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

    • By Northeast
      Maybe a new thread if you have the time JP.  "How to target large, deep gold with the GPZ?"  Is it your conservative settings or something different again?  How does the audio differ, etc? 
      There are bits and pieces (linked below) that maybe all add up to an answer but if there are any other secrets you want to add JP,  I'll listen 
       
    • By WesH
       I have been painfully considering a purchase of a 7000.  Seeing the gold a friends 7000 is getting that seems to be out of reach of a 5000 is giving me reason for this consideration.  However with the areas I used to have access to that facilitates the use of the large coils are being lost due to development and I would have little or no areas to go that there would be a benefit to the large coils.  If Minelab would make a small coil like the 11 inch diameter that is stock with all the other models up to the 7000 it would justify a purchased.  I wonder if it’s the technology in the electronics that will not work with a small coil.
    • By Rail Dawg
      Seeing some barely-used gpz 7000's coming across the auction block.  
      Weren't there early ones that had issues?
      If so how were these issues resolved?
      How can you tell if the unit on the auction block is not one of these?
      Having not owned one yet I'm a little behind and appreciate any feedback.   
    • By ken
      Hello Johnathan the GPZ 7000 has been out for a while now, is there any plans to do a DVD. I could see how a soft ware upgrade could potentially make it harder to give any advice on settings as upgrades come along. Or is the whole thing a big head ache.
    • By rockett
      Hi all  does anybody ground balance there machine as per instructions then leave the machine on the ground with ferrite under the plate ?
      I did this while i was getting the rest of my gear ready and it really made it quieter , in very  hot ground.
      The machine was sitting there for about 5 to 8 min approximately. 
       
    • By mlgdave
      I updated to the latest firmware in september, sunday when I was detecting I would lose my sound through the wireless, I plugged in headphones and no sound from the machine through them either EXCEPT for turning it on, and also when the WM wireless connects I hear that (but probably from the unit not the headphones)
      Anyone else have issues, I do see 2 other threads but have tried both fixes including updating again. No dice, need the GPZ!
      mlgdave
×