Jump to content
phoenix

I Don`t Understand What Minelab Is Doing

Recommended Posts

You know Rick , I'll put money on it that the next gen ML Gold Machine will have 1/2 its circuitry in the coil like the Nox has, that will stuff everyone up that bought a "X" coil

Should that happen, those that have bought these coils will either buy the new Machine or keep what they have, use the 7 as a back up machine after the 8 comes out (if its any good that is) time will tell , 9.5kAU now 13kAU for the 8?

Where will it all end?

Marty 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Marty said:

...1/2 its circuitry in the coil like the Nox has...

It does?

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm looking for machines that keep the circuitry as far from the coil as possible ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

if Minelab is not interested in selling any other aftermarket coils for our zed's then they are missing the boat not selling us overpriced security chip enabled adaptors from technology already developed so we can buy from other vendors.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, 1515Art said:

if Minelab is not interested in selling any other aftermarket coils for our zed's then they are missing the boat not selling us overpriced security chip enabled adaptors from technology already developed so we can buy from other vendors.

That's what I thought, two hundred bucks for a good quality Minelab adapter wouldn't be out of the question for most people.  Most would pay it for peace of mind knowing they're not risking their detector.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, phrunt said:

That's what I thought, two hundred bucks for a good quality Minelab adapter wouldn't be out of the question for most people.  Most would pay it for piece of mind knowing they're not risking their detector.

I suspect trying to look at this from MLs view, if they were to make a "patch lead" they`d be leaving themselves open to warranty claims for damage done to the GPZ caused by an incompatible coil. Anyone could then knock up a coil and put on the Z. It would open a whole can of worms, I know this is so with the GPXs but they may have the ability to be not damaged by an incompatible coil wheras the GPZ being the 1st of new tech (ZVT) may not have this ability and thus suffer damage. 

I don`t think we will get that peace of mind and those of us who go for the X coil should be prepared to shoulder that risk themselves, as you know I`ve gone for the X coil with my 3rd in the mail, but to me the rewards are worth this risk. That old saying comes to mind "if you take the risk be prepared to push the pram"

No doubt ML have Z2 in the pipeline and perhaps it will address the issue that we the customer want a variety of coils.

An Explainer: I spent 20 years of my working life manufacturing and selling a then niche product, the most 5 year warranty claims I had by far were caused by user misuse and were easily solved most just by telephone conversation.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, Norvic said:

"if you take the risk be prepared to push the pram"

I`ve never heard that saying but I like it ?

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, mn90403 said:

I just need to get lucky again.  and again ... haha

Or get some X coils......and go back over your old ground. The results will astound you. Unless some else beats you there with their X coils.:rolleyes: Early bird gets the worm....

Good luck out there

JW ?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Norvic said:

"if you take the risk be prepared to push the pram"

Ha ha....I like that one too.? & I pushed the pram 4 times:rolleyes:. Slow learner, & I thought it was something in the water, so I cut the pipeline. That seemed to end it. Good fun trying though.:laugh:

JW ?

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ML wouldn't even need to sell a physical patch. They could just update the firmware to bypass the chip authentication if they really wanted to allow customers to use more coils. It'd be free and require no cable doctoring and would cost ML $0 in manufacturing costs. They could still charge $200 for that probably if they wanted to and make even more profit.

But then we are right back to square one wondering why instead they wouldn't simply license a code to a 3rd party to build coils and allow that code in a firmware update rather than disabling their code altogether, the manufacturers would pay for the license instead of the customers. And the snake just eats it's tail again leading us around an endless circle of wondering why this or that isn't happening.

The GPZ was designed for firmware updates and coil upgrades yet they appear to have no desire to let either of them happen and no desire to tell us why. Some larger piece of the puzzle is clearly missing that altered business road maps, and which we as general public are not privy to.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Similar Content

    • By Steve Herschbach
      Fisher / Teknetics 2018 Coil Compatibility Chart
    • By yomahat
      Hi all,
      I am looking to buy an additional coil for my MK 14kHz to get some extra depth while in the field. I cannot decide between AF35 and KR40. Could you please advise which coil shall I purchase to add some depth for coin, jewellery and relic hunting and why?
      I would really appreciate your answer!
      Thank you in advance!

    • By gambler
      whites garage sale  so I just ordered this from whites garage sale, now my question is when would I use each of these coils?

    • By Glenn in CO
      Does anyone know any information on the new coil for the TDI SL and if the coil will be available separately?

      TDI SL is now ... TDI Hi-Q
      A new high performance coil design for added depth -
      in two options
      TAN Part Number: 800-0334-Hi-Q
      CAMO 800-0334-Camo
      MSRP: $1199.95
      MAP: $1099.00

    • By phrunt
      A package I've been very much looking forward to arrived in the mail today, I call them the twins.  It made sense to package them both in one package for postage reasons and fortunately JW was working doing some renovations at his house around the corner from mine today so he had his a few minutes after the courier arrived at my place with the package as I shot straight over to give it to him. 
      I tore the box open to find them extremely well packaged


      And now the twins

      15x10 spiral wound X-coils, one for the GPZ, one for the GPX.  The GPZ's coils curly cord seems good to me.

      They came with a spare coil cover.  This is obviously the GPZ coil.

      And the GPX one.
      Hopefully I can find some gold soon with it, I've on a dry spell at the moment, although the football field of coins has kept me busy.  It's been about a month since I've attempted to find gold as my weekends are filled with skiing as my daughter is addicted to it and my week days have been busy doing the local coin hunting, now this coil has arrived I best get out there soon.  It snowed yesterday and today there is a freezing wind blowing off the snow, if it wasn't for that I'd be shooting off now to test it out.  Only about 2 weeks left of ski season.
      JW's been doing pretty well lately with his 10x9" X-coil and he rarely takes it off he loves it so much so it will be interesting to see how he goes with this new one being spiral (flat wound) when his 10x9" is bundle wound. 
    • By rled2005
      Has anyone found a lower shaft for White's TDI to adapt to Minelab coils or coils made for Minelab correctly without extra rubber washers? Tecknetic's lower shaft comes close but is too short.
×
×
  • Create New...